Previous Page  32 / 35 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 35 Next Page
Page Background

Page 59

Notes:

allied

academies

Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care | Volume 2

May 14-15, 2018 | Montreal, Canada

Spring Dermatology &

Skin Care Expo Conference

Background:

There is no clarity if a bilobed flap is the best

treatment of choice for reconstruction of nasal tip defects.

Method:

The nose of twenty patients was photographed 2

years after surgical excision of skin cancer and closure either

with a bilobed flap (n=7) or a full thickness skin graft (n=13).

Photographs were assessed by two dermatologists, two

plastic surgeons and two non-medically trained individuals,

applying the POSAS scale.

Results:

There were no significant differences between

opinions of the two techniques. Overall, on a scale from 0

to 10 where 0 means ‘no visual abnormalities’ the bilobed

flap scored 2.22 versus 2.33 for the skin graft. Where

medical consultants preferred the bilobed flap, non-medical

individuals favored the skin graft closure.

Conclusion:

We found no evidence to support the textbook

statement that the bilobed flap excels for reconstruction of

defects less than 1.5 cm around the nasal tip

Speaker Biography

M A Kemler is currently in private practice as a Plastic Surgeon at Martini Hospital

Groningen, Netherlands. He is the Member of the Dutch Society for Plastic Surgery

(NVPC) and also the Member of the Dutch Association for Hand Surgery (NVvH). He is

the author of over Research Publications, in peer-reviewed journals.

e:

M.Kemler@mzh.nl

Two year evaluation of either bilobed flap or full thickness skin graft as a closure technique of the

nasal tip

Marius A Kemler

Martini Hospital Groningen Netherlands