Previous Page  8 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Page 59

Notes:

allied

academies

17

th

International Conference on

4

th

International Conference on

NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE

&

MENTAL HEALTH AND PRIMARY CARE

October 16-18, 2017 | Toronto, Canada

J Neurol Neurorehabil Res 2017 | Volume 2 Issue 3

Background:

Of all the side effects of chemotherapy, CINV

remains one of the most dreaded by patients. Evidence

based guidelines recommend nabilone for prevention

of anticipatory chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting

(ACINV) but not for rescue nausea/vomiting (RNV). Nabilone

may increase the risk for over sedation and falls. The

purpose of the study was to characterize the frequency

and patterns of Nabilone prescribing and administration as

well as to compare the rate of falls in patients prescribed

vs non-prescribed nabilone for nausea/ vomiting among

hospitalized oncology patients.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted by reviewing

the medical charts of 300 oncology patients admitted in

months of June-August 2016 in tertiary care hospitals in

KPK. Prescribed indications and actual administration of

Nabilone as well as documented patient falls were recorded.

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions were defined as

frequency <8 hours, dose >2mg, multiple concurrent as

needed prescriptions. Inappropriate administrations were

not given in the prescribed 1st/2nd/3rd line sequence.

Nabilone prescriptions for neuropathic analgesia were

excluded.

Result:

Out of 300 patients, 61% (n=183) patients with mean

age 51±19 years were prescribed nabilone. The length of

stay was 14±11 (p-value=0.0001). The results showed that

Nabilone was prescribed for RNV was 49% (n=91) while

for ACINV, it was only 21% (n=38). Inappropriate dosing

frequency was 9%, concurrent prescriptions were 17% and

inappropriate administration was 19% (n=53) patients.

Interestingly fall rate in nabilone prescribed patient’s p value

was 0.7 and among non-prescribed patient’s p value was 1.5.

Conclusion:

Potentially inappropriate prescribing and

administrations of Nabilone for rescue nausea/vomiting

were common. Estimated fall rate was not significantly

different between patients prescribed and not prescribed

Nabilone in this small pilot study. Informed consent was

obtained from all patients..

Speaker Biography

Sardar Alam, Pharm.D, now a pre-doctoral student in the school of medicine, University

of Crete, Greece. He is a registered pharmacist. His research interest includes oncology,

CAM therapies and drug delivery systems. His research articles and reviews have

been published in international peer-reviewed journals as well as in conferences.

His research expertise includes prescriptions interventions, dose adjustment. He

has experience in hospital as well as pharmaceutical industry where he works as a

pharmacist as well as R & D officer respectively.

e:

sardaralam754@gmail.com

The frequency and patterns of Nabilone prescribing and administration among hospitalized

oncology patients

Sardar Alam

1

, Muhammad Safdar

1

, Muhammad Tariq

2

, Abdul Zahir

3

and

Waqar Alam

4

1

Gomal University DIK, Pakistan

2

Hayatabad medical complex hospital, Pakistan

3

Hubei medical University, Hubei province China

4

Dinajpur Medical College,Bangladesh