Previous Page  2 / 20 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

Page 19

Notes:

allied

academies

Res Rep Gynaecol Obstet 2017 | Volume 1 Issue 4

November 02-03, 2017 | Chicago, USA

Embryology and In vitro Fertilization

World Congress on

Is the cumulative live birth rate following

in vitro

fertilization (IVF) lower with provincial government

coverage than prior to coverage?

Khudhari A

¹, ²

, Hemmings R

1,4

, Sampalis J

3

, Phillips S

1,5

and

Sylvestre C

1,2

¹

OVO Clinic, Canada

²

Université de Montreal, Canada

Introduction:

To determine if there is a difference between

the cumulative live birth rate per IVF cycle in good prognosis

patients before and after IVF provincial coverage.

Background:

Most studies conclude that the cumulative

pregnancy rate depends on embryo quality and quantity, which

is directly related to patient’s age. In the best-case scenario, the

cumulative pregnancy rate reaches 79% when the number of

embryos reaches 15. Other studies reported 75% probability of

live birth after six cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation and

IVF.

Design of Study:

Retrospective cohort study comparing IVF

cycles between January 2008 to December 2009 (before

coverage), and between January 2012 to December 2013

(during coverage).

Methodology:

The study was carried out at a University-

affiliated private IVF clinic. 298 good prognosis IVF patients from

2008-2009and610patients from2012-2013were included. The

cumulative LBR per IVF cycle was the main outcome measure;

the secondary outcome measures were the type of protocol

used, percentage of ICSI cycles, fertilization rate, proportion of

day 3 versus (vs.) day 5 embryo transfers, average number of

embryos transferred, average number of frozen embryos, the

clinical pregnancy rate and the multiple pregnancies.

Results:

No statistically significant difference in the cumulative

LBR was seen; it was 44.8% in 2008-2009 but 40.3% in 2012-

2013 with p=0.134. The long agonist protocol was used the

most during 2008-2009 (75.5% of the cycles) compared to

antagonist protocol in 2012-2013 (77.2%) p<0.01. There

was no difference in the use of ICSI, but the fertilization rate

in 2012-2013 (60.9% vs. 65.9%, p=0.001). The proportion of

day 3 embryos transferred in 2008-2009 (82.2%) and 2012-

2013 (43.9%), p=0.005, and the proportion of day 5 embryos

transferred is 3.7% in 2008-2009 but 54.9% in 2012-2013,

p<0.001. The average number of embryos transferred in 2008-

2009 was 1.96 vs. 1.08 in 2012-2013. The average number of

frozen embryos per cycle was not significantly different. The

clinical pregnancy rate was not significantly different (56.8%

vs. 54.3%). The multiple pregnancy rates were 19.4% in 2008-

2009 and 0.5% in 2012-2013. In good prognosis IVF patients,

the cumulative LBR per cycle started was not significantly

different after IVF provincial coverage and the move towards

eSET on day 3 or day 5. No advantage of transferring multiple

embryos in this group of patients, and that transferring one at

a time reduces significantly the multiple pregnancy rate and its

complications.

Limitation & Conclusion:

Not all of the patients have had all of

their embryos transferred. The design of the provincial coverage

influenced themanagement of the patients to a certain degree.

Patients undergoing an IVF cycle will be able to know their CLBR

from that cycle.

Speaker Biography

Dr Adwaa Khudhari is a Consultant in Obstetrics & Gynecology at Reproductive

endocrinology & Infertility which is located at Jeddah, K.S.A

e:

dr.alkhudari@yahoo.com