Previous Page  9 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

Page 48

allied

academies

Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics | Volume: 3

July 23-25, 2018 | Moscow, Russia

12

th

World Cancer Congress

Biomedical significance and ameliorative potentials of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibitors

in the development, progression and Metastasis of Prostate Cancer: A review

Lawrence Okonkwo Aka

St. Matthew’s University, British West Indies

N

itric oxide (NO) is synthesized in a variety of tissues and

organs in a reaction where the amino acid L-arginine

is converted into L-citruline. The enzyme catalyzing this

reaction is designated as nitric oxide synthase (NOS).

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is one of the three

different isoforms of nitric oxide synthase. Aside the desirable

effects of enhanced neurotransmission and vasodilation

produced by the constitutive isoforms (nNOS and eNOS),

the inducible isoform (iNOS) is associated with cytotoxicity

of macrophages and tumor-induced immunosuppression.

Expression of (iNOS) in various human tumors has been

classically demonstrated in which case it promotes the

progression of such tumors. The selective expression of iNOS

has been reported in human prostrate carcinoma and thus

nitric oxide consequently produced may have many roles in

the development, progression and metastasis of prostate

cancer. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) significantly

characterizes the development and progression of prostatic

adenocarcinoma and has been associated with high levels

of iNOS. Interestingly debates over PIN distribution and

expression of (iNOS) is gaining momentum and points to

the potentials of inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in

the amelioration of this development and progression. The

immunohistochemical examination of the activity of iNOS

in prostatic carcinoma has been significantly demonstrated

in both basal epithelial cells and secretory cells of the

glandular epithelium. Though nitric oxide produced by iNOS

can have cytotoxic and cytostatic effects on tumor cells, and

may act as tumor growth suppressors, its identified role

in promoting angiogenesis in tumor suggests that it may

stimulate tumor growth rather than inhibit it. There are

conflicting information on the specific role of NO in cancer

growth. While some hold the opinion of NO acting as a

tumor suppressor others suggest that it actually promotes

cancer growth hence a dual role. Recent findings suggest

that NO may be relevant for tumor progression through

at least two mechanisms: the stimulation of angiogenesis

and increased mutagenesis through the direct action of

free radicals on the DNA. In addition, NO released from

tumor cells is suggested to participate in the tumor-induced

immunosuppression via the anti-proliferative effect of NO

on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Many evidences abound

regarding the strong association between iNOS expression

and rapid prostate cancer cell proliferation rate, depicting

a good predictor of poor survival in univariate analysis, but

was inferior to established prognostic factors in multivariate

analysis. From the various experimental observations, all

three isoforms of NOS can be involved in promoting or

inhibiting the etiology of cancer including prostate cancer in

humans. NOS activity has been detected in tumor cells of

various histogenetic origins and has been associated with

tumor grade, proliferation rate, and expression of important

signaling components associated with cancer development

such as the estrogen receptor. Increased NO generation in

a cell may select mutant P53 cells and contribute to tumor

angiogenesis by upregulating vascular endothelial growth

factor (VEGF). Due to the importance of NO in various

pathological processes including prostatic carcinoma, NOSes

are regarded as an important pharmacological target and

a great deal of effort has been made to design specific

NOS inhibitors. However, the high degree of similarity

among NOS isoforms poses an obstacle when attempting

to find a specific inhibitor of a particular isoform. From the

upcoming experimental observations on the expression

of NOS IN prostate carcinoma, it becomes very apt to

suggest that inhibiting the production of NO synthesis

by iNOS inhibitors would provide great opportunities

and potentials for the management and amelioration of

prostatic carcinoma. Therefore, an understanding of the

molecular dynamics of NO in prostatic carcinoma would be

very valuable in the development of drugs that potentially

can be helpful in adult male prostate cancer patients.

e:

lawrence_aka@yahoo.com