Previous Page  8 / 33 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 33 Next Page
Page Background

Page 40

Notes:

allied

academies

Joint Event

February 21-22, 2019 | Paris, France

Microbiology & Applied

Microbiology

2

nd

International Conference on

World Congress on

Wound Care, Tissue Repair

and Regenerative Medicine

&

Journal of Trauma and Critical Care | Volume 3

Slight improvement of the effectiveness in treating cleft lip scars with silicone gel versus silicone

sheet: A secondary analysis

Qiaowan Lee

1

and Yensheng Wang

2, 3

1

Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan

2

Yale University School of Public Health, USA

3

Chang-gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan

Introduction:

Silicone sheet is often used for preventing cleft

lip scar postoperatively with concerns of ingestion, application

site irritation and short application time. Silicone gel has day-

long application duration with better safety. Previous study

suggested no difference between forms of silicone in treating

cleft lip scarring without controlling potential confounders. We

aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of silicone gel versus sheet

in a different model, controlling surgical gap, side and patient

effects.

Method:

Datawas retrieved fromprevious studywith additonal

information from the author. In short, silicone gel/sheets were

randomlyassigned to thepatients. Clinical scar evaluationscores

(VSS, VAS, width) were measured 6 month after application.

Transformation was performed for normailzation and direction

purpose. Generalized linear model was performed controlling

the measurement, age, gap and patient effects with Tukey’s

adjustment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to compare the

result.

Result:

There are 29 observations in sheet groupwithmean VSS

0.46 (SD 0.11), mean 10/VAS 1.42 (SD 1.20) and mean width

2.75 (SD 1.44). There are 26 observations in gel group, with

mean VSS 0.41 (SD0.13), mean 10/VAS 1.35 (SD0.18) andmean

width 2.06 (SD 1.71). Silicone gel had a lower score compared

to sheet after tukey’s adjustment. (p=0.0048, 95CI: 0.05, 0.26).

Sensitivity analysis showed a similar result.

Conclusion:

Silicone gel appeared to slightly improve post-

operative cleft lip scars compared to silicon sheet. With the

advantage of safety and patient-friendly features, silicon gel

could be recommended for postoperative care of cleft lip scars

in infants.

Speaker Biography

Qiaowan Lee has completed her MD at Chang-gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan in

2015. She devoted to clinical studies that discover potential treatments for surgical

wounds. Qiaowan is currently a resident doctor at Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan.

e:

DAZ06@tpech.gov.tw

Qiaowan Lee et al.

, J Trauma Crit Care, Volume 3

DOI: 10.4066/2591-7358-C1-003