16 / 16
Biomedical Research
|
Volume 29
Page 38
allied
academies
CARDIOLOGY AND CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE
&
International Conference on
International Conference on
J u n e 1 8 - 1 9 , 2 0 1 8 | O s a k a , J a p a n
Joint Event on
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
PREOPERATIVE CARDIOPULMONARY
REHABILITATION FOR IMPROVEMENT
OF POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY OF LIFE
IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY
ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY
Mei-Tien Yeh
Cardinal Tien College of Healthcare, Taiwan
Background:
After the heart surgery, the patient had surgical wounds pain
induce the respiratory dysfunction, sleep disorders, anxiety and other
issues lead to the patient delaying getting out of bed, which may easily
reduce postoperative activity endurance, and affect the daily activity
progress, prolonging postoperative recovery and life quality.
Purpose:
To compair the differences in quality of life and the degree of
improvement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery who
receives cardiopulmonary rehabilitation before and after surgery.
Object:
The case about to undergo coronary bypass surgery
Result:
I. Comparison of the quality of life indicators at each time point
with the two groups at each time point. (I) At the time of receipt (T0): The
average score of the two groups of samples due to physical physiology
problems limited role (RP) was less than 20 points. The average score of
Role-Restricted Functions (REs) due to emotional problems is less than 50
points. The average scores of the two groups of samples in the remaining
quality of life and each scale were greater than 50 points. However, there
were no statistically significant differences between the scales. (II) One
month after surgery (T5): Between the two groups, only the general quality
of life (GH) and physical and physiological function (PF) were statistically
significantly different (p=0.002, p=0.010). This indicates that in the month
after surgery (T5), the general health status and physical and physiological
function subscales of the experimental group were also better than
those of the control group. II. Second, the two groups in the quality of life
indicators before and after intervention measures (I) The average scores
of the general health status (GH) ’ mental health (MH) ‘ physical function
(PF) and vigor (VT) at the time of receipt (T0) in the control group and the
experimental group were both lower than those in the first month (T5)
after surgery (p<0.001). (II) The control group (T0) was higher than the
one month after surgery (T5) (p=0.010). The experimental group (T0) was
lower than the one month after surgery (T5) (p=0.048). This indicates
that the social function of the control group sample (T0) was better than
Mei-Tien Yeh, Biomed Res 2018, Volume 29 | DOI: 10.4066/biomedicalresearch-C2-005
the one month after the surgery (T5), and the
social function of the experimental group
sample at the time of receipt (T0) was worse
than that of the surgery one month (T5). (III)
The control group (T0) was lower than the
one month after surgery (T5) (p=0.008). The
experimental group (T0) was higher than
the one month after surgery (T5) (p=0.021).
This indicates that the control group sample
at the time of receipt (T0) due to emotional
problems caused by the degree of limited
role (RE) compared with one month after
surgery (T5) time difference; experimental
group sample (T0) caused by emotional
problems The degree of restricted role (RE) is
better than one month after surgery (T5). IV
Physical Restriction (RP) due to Physiological
Physiological Problems: The physical and
physiological problems (RP) and Body Pain
(BP) of the control and experimental groups
were similar (p > 0.05).
fortum.yeh@gmail.com