Previous Page  12 / 14 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 14 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Page 26

International Journal of Respiratory Medicine

|

Volume 3

LUNG CANCER AND COPD

5

th

International Congress on

J u n e 2 5 - 2 6 , 2 0 1 8 | A m s t e r d a m , N e t h e r l a n d s

Lynn F Reinke et al., Int J Respir Med 2018, Volume 3

ONE CONVERSATION IS NOT ENOUGH:

THE LONG-TERM IMPACT OF AN

END-OF-LIFE COMMUNICATION

INTERVENTION AMONG PATIENTS

WITH COPD

Lynn F Reinke, Laura C Feemster, Jennifer McDowell, Eric

Gunnick, Erica V Tartaglione, Edmund Udris, J Randall Curtis

and

David H Au

University of Washington, USA

Aim:

The aim of the project is to assess if an end-of-life communication

intervention with patients with COPD led to higher long-term

documentation of advance care planning discussions at the end-of-life.

Background:

We previously demonstrated that providing clinicians a

patient-specificfeedbackformaboutpatients’communicationpreferences

improved the occurrence and quality of clinician communication about

end-of-life care.

Methods:

Among those individuals enrolled in the intervention study

(2004-2007) who had died during the follow-up period (up to 2013),

we assessed if patients in the intervention arm had more goals of care

discussions and formal advance directives completed as compared to

controls. We conducted logistic models accounting for provider level

clustering, adjusting for age, FEV1 and race.

Results:

Among the 376 patients, 157 died (76 in the intervention arm, 81

controls). Over an average duration of 3.6 years (time of the first study

appointment to death), 73% patients engaged in 451 unique end-of-life

care discussions. The intervention was not associated with a higher

percentage of patients with documented end-of-life conversations (I:C

75% vs. 72%, p=0.63) or completion of advance care directives (26% vs.

29%, p=0.55).

Conclusions:

Despite initially improving the occurrence of end-of-life

conversations, the intervention did not increase documentation of

subsequent conversations about end-of-life care, nor did it improve

documentation of advance directives. Future research should focus on

testing multi-faceted, longitudinal, system-level interventions to enhance

conversations about goals of care that promote goal-concurrent care.

Lynn F Reinke has completed her PhD in Biobe-

havioral Science at the University of Washing-

ton, School of Nursing and a post-doctoral fel-

lowship at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Her program of research focuses on improving

the delivery of palliative care for patients with

advanced, serious illnesses specifically COPD,

lung cancer and multi-morbidities. She has

conducted several studies testing methods to

improve clinicians end-of-life communication

skills for patients with advanced illnesses. She

is sought out for her clinical expertise in manag-

ing patients with severe dyspnea and dyspnea

crisis episodes. She has over 40 publications in

peer-reviewed journals and has presented her

research nationally and internationally. She is

an elected member of the National Academy of

Nursing and serves in leadership roles for the

American Thoracic Society. She has completed

her Health and Aging Policy Fellowship in 2017.

reinkl@uw.edu

BIOGRAPHY