Page 49
allied
academies
Journal of Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases | Volume 3
May 25-26, 2018 | New York, USA
World Liver Conference 2018
Background:
Liver resection is the only viable therapeutic
treatment option for several neoplastic entities of the liver.
Although, the number of resectable patients is increasing
in Syria, liver failure is still a major complication affecting
mortality and morbidity rates. Methods: Between 2009 and
2016, 104 patients undergoing liver resection in Damascus
University Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively
analyzed. Liver function tests were conducted before
surgery (ps) and in the perioperative period (po) and
comparisons were performed with division into anatomic
VS non-anatomic or malignant VS non-malignant groups.
Results: Liver synthetic, excretory and detoxifying functions
deteriorated after liver resection (INR ps ‘presurgery’=1.129
po ‘perioperative’=1.426 P<0.001, TP ps=7.426 po=5.581
P<0.001, ALB ps=4.204 po=3.242 P<0.001, T-Bill ps=0.061
po=0.136 P<0.001) and liver cell necrosis increased after
resection (ALT ps=27.597 po=200.221 P<0.001, AST
ps=33.395 po=190.553 P<0.001). There was no significant
difference in liver functions when we compared anatomic
VS non-anatomic groups or malignant VS non-malignant
groups, but liver cell necrosis was higher with malignancies
(ALT malignant group=236.475 non-malignant group=89.5
P=0.002, AST malignant group=222.644 non-malignant
group=101.125 P=0.001). Conclusion: Although liver
resection affects liver function significantly, no differences in
outcomes were found between anatomic VS non anatomic
or malignant VS non-malignant groups.
e:
dr.baselahmad@gmail.comPerioperative liver function after hepatectomy in a tertiary university hospital in Damascus
Basel Ahmad, Khaled Turkmani, Mohamad Essam Marwa, Tareq Ahmad, Ramez Baghdadi, Shaimaa Aboudamaah, Khetam Alkhatib
and
Mohamad
Ahmad
Damascus University, Syria