Page 55
allied
academies
Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics | Volume: 3
July 23-25, 2018 | Moscow, Russia
12
th
World Cancer Congress
Clinico-economic analysis of PD-1 inhibitor and iBRAF+iMEK combination for treating Metastatic
Melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation
Alexey Cheberda
Center for Pharmacoeconomics Research, Russia
S
kin melanoma is an important, severe condition and one
of the most aggressive oncological diseases, characterized
by high lethality. Relatively high costs of novel innovative
treatments for this condition necessitate analysis of clinico-
economical properties of such treatments in Russian
healthcare setting. The pharmacoeconomic analysis included
cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis
performed using a model constructed based on a network
meta-analysis of fist-line treatments of melanoma with BRAF
mutation including target therapy and immunotherapy. The
alternatives compared were PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab
compared to nivolumab and BRAF inhibitor combined
with MEK inhibitor. Model assessed total survival, average
progression-free survival and direct costs. Obtained results
indicate that year of pembrolizumab treatment was 29%
less expensive than dabrafenib+trametinib combination,
and 60% less expensive than vemurafenib+cobimetinib,
while also 1,7% less expensive than nivolumab treatment.
Cost-effectiveness ration for pembrolizumab was the
lowest of all alternatives compared, indicating highest
cost-effectiveness. Budget impact analysis has shown that
expansion of pembrolizumab use to 50% (at the expense
of other alternatives) would result in budgetary savings
totalling 1 507,5 million rubles accounted for Russian patient
population size.
Use of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients
with BRAF V600 positive melanoma is thus associated with
highest cost-effectiveness and budgetary savings and is
pharmacoeconomically expedient.
e:
aecheberda@healtheconomics.ru