Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 14 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 14 Next Page
Page Background

Page 66

N o v e m b e r 0 5 - 0 6 , 2 0 1 8 | P h i l a d e l p h i a , U S A

3

rd

INTERNATIONAL OBESITY SUMMIT AND EXPO

&

&

DIABETES, NUTRITION, METABOLISM & MEDICARE

2

nd

International Conference on

Joint Event on

OF EXCELLENCE

IN INTERNATIONAL

MEETINGS

alliedacademies.com

YEARS

LASER, OPTICS AND PHOTONICS

World Conference on

Obesity Summit 2018 & Diabetes Conference 2018 & Laser Photonics Conference 2018

Biomedical Research

|

ISSN: 0976-1683

|

Volume 29

Biomed Res 2018, Volume 29 | DOI: 10.4066/biomedicalresearch-C7-020

SERUM INSULIN RESPONSE AFTER ACUTE AND CHRONIC SUCRALOSE

INGESTION IN HEALTHY PATIENTS WITH VARIABLE BODY MASS INDEX

Nallely Bueno-Hernández

and

Galileo Escobedo

General Hospital of Mexico, Mexico

I

n recent years, the consumption of non-caloric sweeteners (NCS) has considerably increased but several publications suggest

that their use is associated with insulin resistance. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic exposure

to sucralose on the insulin metabolism and glucose in young, healthy adults with different body mass index stage.

Material and methods:

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in healthy volunteers with the

homeostatic model assessment (HOMA index) less than 3.8, from 18 to 35 years aged and without metabolic alterations. Each

patient was assigned to one of the 3 different intervention groups: 1) 48 mg/60 ml of sucralose, 2) 96 mg/60 ml of sucralose and 3)

60 ml of water, which should be a daily intake for 10 weeks. An oral glucose tolerance test was made to each patient (OGTT). The

areas under the curve (AUC) of the OGTT were calculated and the data were analyzed with the statistical package SPSSv.17 with

the Wilcoxon test considering a significant P value <0.05.

Results:

We recruited 96 volunteers. The insulin AUC was significantly increased in the second OGTT on the 48 mg sucralose

intervention group (AUC=9262 to 11398, P=0.02) and 96 mg of sucralose (AUC=6962 to 8393, p=0.03), but not the water group

(AUC=9054 to 9396; P=NS). The basic metabolic characteristics such as urea, creatinine and monocytes were similar in the three

groups. However, the final analysis in the group with the highest concentration of sucralose (96 mg/dL) showed significant changes

at the serum concentrations of urea (22.3 mg/dL to 25.4 mg/dL), creatinine (0.78 mg/dL at 0.84 mg/dL) and monocytes (0.42 mg/

dL to 0.36).

Conclusions:

The chronic consumption of sucralose had a significant effect on the insulin and glucose metabolism in healthy young

adults with different BMI.