Previous Page  6 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Page 24

May 16-17, 2019 | Prague, Czech Republic

2

nd

International Conference on

22

nd

International Conference on

Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology

Advanced Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

Joint Event

&

Journal of Materials Science and Nanotechnology | Volume 3

Mater Sci Nanotechnol, Volume 3

Notes:

Overview of commercial nanomaterial products and the common thread of compat­

ibility

David Strawser

Technical Developments, Israel

C

onsumer Product Indexes (CPI) that relate to products

incorporating at least one nanomaterial have been

developed by several countries including the United States,

Japan and Germany. From these indexes we find about

2000 consumer products listed from 32 countries. These

products can be grouped into five major categories based

on composition: metals, carbonaceous, silicon, other, not

revealed. The "not revealed" category comprises nearly 50%

of the products, metals about 35%, and carbonaceous, silicon

and other all garner about 5%each. The types of organizations

that are conducting research and/or commercialization

of nanomaterials can be grouped into 5 major categories:

industry, non-governmental, research center, governmental

and university. Althoughwemight expect industry to perceive

lucrative advantages from developing and promoting nano-

based products, it is interesting to see that they are found to

be at the bottom of the list, garnering a mere 4%, whereas

university involvement is 12 times greater at 50%. Combined

government and university involvement amount to 75%.

A major challenge in all areas of product development

is compatibility between components and with the end

use environments. Developing products that incorporate

nanomaterials presents an even greater challenge in

compatibility issues due to either the high reactivity brought

about by the high surface area of nanomaterials, or by almost

complete incompatibility with nearly all other substances.

As we strive to produce more commercial products based

on nanomaterials, perhaps we should be questioning why

industry involvement is drastically lower than either academic

or government entities, and if a model can be found that

enablesamoreefficientrouteformlabtocommercialproducts.

Speaker Biography

David Strawser brings to the conference a wealth of chemical and

technology experience in a wide variety of industries and academic

settings that include nanomaterials, pharmaceutical and health

care, conductive polymers, electronics, waste water treatment and

detergents. In addition, to research projects with nanomaterials, he

has both worked with and headed teams that have taken materials

from the laboratory R&D stage through commercial production. His

unusual ability to understand technology and applications in unrelated

fields has been demonstrated in patents, commercial products and

processes. He currently focuses on the challenges of developing

methods to functionalize nanomaterials in order to tune compatibility

with other materials in order to maximize the contribution that the

nanomaterials make to the formulation properties.

e:

david@technical-developments.com