Previous Page  14 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Page 73

Notes:

Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning | Volume 3

April 08-09, 2019 | Zurich, Switzerland

Health Care and Neuroscience

International Conference on

Autologous fat graŌing to the post mastectomy irradiated chest wall: A new way for

minimal invasive breast reconstrucƟon - A series of 54 paƟents

K Razzouk

InsƟtut du Sein Nice Santa Maria, France

Introduction:

Breast reconstruction after total

mastectomy and irradiation is a real challenge

for the surgical teams. And is a crucial step for

the patient in the life after breast cancer. The

effect of radiotherapy on the skin often leads to

preferring the reconstructions by flaps. However,

reconstructions by prosthesis carries a high risk of

complications and unsatisfactory cosmetic results.

The optimization of skin trophicity by lipofilling

and its positive impact on the results of secondary

prosthetic breast reconstruction led us to perform

an autologous fat grafting prior to secondary

implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy

and radiotherapy.

Patients andmethod:

All patientswere treated at the

same center between 2012 and 2015. They all had a

total mastectomy and irradiation. They all had one

or more sessions of lipofilling prior to breast implant

reconstruction. Patients were followed to collect

this data: postoperative complications, prosthesis

removal, cosmetic result, and tumor recurrences.

Results:

Fifty-four patients were included. The

mean pre-pectoral lipofilling session was 1.1 (1-2).

Theaveragevolumeof fat injected is 150cc (80-250).

The average time between the end of treatment

and the first session of lipofilling is 20.4 months (3-

60). The mean volume of the prosthesis is 400cc

(290-620). The mean follow-up time is 22 months.

No local tumor recurrence was reported. One

patient had a cutaneous necrosis after lipofilling.

Implant explantation was performed in three cases

(5.5%). The mean cosmetic result is 4.7 (3.5-5).

Conclusion:

Pre-pectoral lipofilling prior to implant

breast reconstruction improves the chances of

success by optimizing the trophicity of the skin.

It significantly reduces the risk of prosthesis

explanation.

Therefore, this protocol allows us to propose a

minimal invasive breast reconstruction, with no

additional scar and no additional pain.

e

:

kais.razzouk@gmail.com