Previous Page  11 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Page 70

Notes:

Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning | Volume 3

April 08-09, 2019 | Zurich, Switzerland

Health Care and Neuroscience

International Conference on

Development of a competency register for unregulated health care providers on an

acquired brain injury in-patient rehabilitation unit

Carmen Carmazan

Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada

Context:

Unregulated Health Care Providers including

rehabilitation assistants/rehabilitation therapists

(RhT) work under the direction and supervision of

Regulated Health care providers, such as registered

nurses, registered physiotherapists, occupational

therapists and speech and language pathologists. In

theinpatientABIrehabilitationunit,RhT’sprovidecare

and treatment to patients post ABI in the following

domains: medical, psychological, behavioral, physical,

cognitive, communication and social. In Ontario,

rehabilitation assistants are not registered with a

regulatory body and do not have a standard level

of training and education or a mandatory education

requirement.

Objective:

This Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)

project set out todefine core and clinical competencies

for RhTs and describe the accountabilities to the

Regulated Health Care Professional. The competency

register supports staff professional development, and

identification of learning objectives, as well as a guide

for new staff orientation.

Methods:

An interdisciplinary working group was

formed and developed a 2 part Competency Tool

consisting a) Core competencies for all staff regardless

of discipline b) Discipline specific competencies. The

competency tool is based on best practices and is in

alignment with the role and scope of practice of RhTs

on the ABI unit. A formal process was followed to

include and categorize the competency items: a) Brain

stormed items for inclusion; b) Created an affinity

diagram of all the brainstormed items; c) Put all the

items in to competency statements; d) 2-3 reviewing

cycles; e) feedback from individual disciplines; f) edits

and approval.

Conclusion:

A formal multi-use competency document

was created with staff input for RhT’s in an ABI setting.

e

:

carmazan@HHSC.CA