allied
academies
Page 55
Journal of Gastronenterology and Digestive Diseases
|
Volume 3
J u n e 2 5 - 2 6 , 2 0 1 8 | D u b l i n , I r e l a n d
GASTROENTEROLOGY
International Conference on
EFFECTS OF PROSPECTIVE METFORMIN ADMINISTRATION
ON ANTICANCER THERAPY AND CANCER STEM CELLS IN
PATIENTS WITH GI AND OTHER MALIGNANCIES
Wasif M Saif
and
Robert E Martell
Tufts University School of Medicine, USA
Background:
Observational studies have demonstrated association of Metformin with reduced cancer incidence and mortality in
multiple cancer types. The anti-neoplastic effects of metformin are believed through many mechanisms including activation of
AMP-activated protein kinase, which controls the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) growth regulatory pathway.
Patients & Methods:
We conducted delayed start randomized trial of non-diabetic patients in two stages: patients were
randomized to two arms during stage I - concurrent arm (metformin + chemo) vs. delayed arm (chemo alone) and in stage two,
patients in delayed armwere crossed over to receive metformin. Patients received metformin 500 mg twice daily + chemotherapy
to define DLTs in both stages. Translational correlates included effects of metformin on expression and phosphorylation of AMPK
by western blot in PBMCs. In another pilot study, we evaluated the safety and impact of pretreatment with metformin on colorectal
cancer stem cells (CCSC) in patients undergoing resection and evaluate the effects of metformin on the expression of CCSC
markers by measuring relative mRNA levels of CD133, OCT4 and NANOG using RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.
Results:
In the randomized study, DLTs seen only included those associated with established chemo AEs. No lactic acidosis or
hypoglycemia occurred. Restaging showed stable disease in 46% and 28% of patients had decline in tumor markers. Analysis
of phospho-AMPKα showed that phosphorylation of AMPKα was increased after metformin (mean=1.114±0.512) and analysis
of total levels of AMPKα showed similar results (mean=1.04±0.28). In the pilot study on patients undergoing surgery, no grade
three or four AEs related to metformin including hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis were observed. No unexpected post-operative
complications were witnessed. CCSC markers showed decrease in expression of CD133, OCT4 and NANOG following metformin.
Conclusions:
Our studies include the largest prospective study in cancer patients who received metformin in combination of
chemotherapy and the first one that prospectively demonstrates the impact of metformin on AMPK phosphorylation and impact
on CCSC. These preliminary data warrant further investigation to explore the benefits of metformin both as a chemotherapeutic
and chemopreventive agent in adequately powered prospective studies.
WSaif@tuftsmedicalcenter.orgJ Gastroenterol Dig Dis 2018, Volume 3