Previous Page  5 / 34 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 34 Next Page
Page Background

Page 25

allied

academies

Ophthalmol Case Rep 2017 Volume 1 Issue 1

August 21-23, 2017 | Toronto, Canada

EYE AND VISION

3

rd

International Conference on

Introduction:

Vitreoretinal surgery has far advanced

since the last decades, coming to a modern area of both

vitrectomy and viewing systems, as well as with better

approaches from the retinal surgeon, with the use of smaller

gauge instruments, making the procedure easier to perform,

thus contributing to a better follow up and recovery from the

surgery. Though repairing techniques have changed, scleral

buckling techniques are still popular since Charles Schepen’s

techniques in the early 1950s. Combined approaches are

still largely employed, increasing the likelihood of attaching

the retina, such as pars plana vitrectomy and scleral

buckling procedures, with laser or cryotherapy, the last

one mentioned less used due to disadvantages involving

retinal pigment epithelium spreading and proliferative

vitreoretinopathy, but not counter indicated though. Even

though the cost and equipment involving vitrectomies are

higher than those of scleral buckling alone, the anatomical

results are proved to be faster with both approaches rather

than with just one. Scleral buckling techniques, even though

used in a lesser extent, still have the indication especially in

the phakic patient. For the pseudophakic or aphakic patient,

some buckle techniques or modified and combined buckle

and vitrectomy techniques are used, such as using a band

together with vitrectomy to help increase the likelihood

the retina will attach during and after the procedure is

made. Vitreoretinal surgery used to take too long before

the development of wide angle vitrectomy viewing systems.

Before it, prisms lenses had to be rotated for the aim of

viewing the far periphery, and the contact lens often had

to be held with a ring on the cornea. With the advent of

23-gauge vitrectomy, 25 and 27 came afterwards and are

far more used nowadays, and benefits are linked to better

success rates. Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography

assisted vitrectomies, despite expensive, are helping treat

macular diseases as well as other vitreoretinopathies, giving

a simultaneous visualisation of the procedure of the actual

surgical record comparing with the topographical cut making

it more accurate to approach the retina and expecting

better outcomes. Magnifying lenses and inverting image

systems are applied in the management of manage macular

diseases such as macular holes, epiretinal membranes and

others such as proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The use of gas

or silicon oils increased overtime, as well as fluorocarbon

liquids, playing a very important role not only in repairing

retinal detachments, but also helping the surgeon control

better hard and demanding cases.

Conclusions:

We conclude that such a combined approach

to primary pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments

offers significant benefits to scleral buckling alone. We

believe that the improved success rate is a function of

vitrectomy contributing to both an improved peripheral

visibility, resulting in fewer missed peripheral breaks, and

a lower likelihood of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. We

recommend this combined surgical approach for all primary

pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments. We conclude

that such a combined approach to primary pseudophakic

and aphakic retinal detachments offers significant benefits

to scleral buckling alone. We believe that the improved

success rate is a function of vitrectomy contributing to both

an improved peripheral visibility, resulting in fewer missed

peripheral breaks, and a lower likelihood of proliferative

vitreoretinopathy. We recommend this combined surgical

approach for all primary pseudophakic and aphakic retinal

detachments. Also, smaller gauge vitrectomies and wide-

angle vitrectomy viewing systems help manage tough

cases with less time and better outcome, making it feasible

and more cost effective in today’s vitreoretinal surgery

techniques.

Speaker Biography

Hudson Nakamura is a Medical Specialist in Ophthalmology and specialized in Retina

and Vitreous. He completed his study from School of Medicine at the Federal University

of Goiás – UFG and Residency from the Base Hospital of the Federal District - Brasília

- DF. Presently, member of American Academy of Ophthalmology, Brazilian Council of

Ophthalmology, Canadian Society of Ophthalmology and also the member of most

prestigious society ARVO - The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

United States. He works as a Professor in Department of Retina and Vitreous Course

of Medical Residency in Ophthalmology at the Bank of Goias Eye Foundation. He also

works as Specialist in vitreoretinal disease Fellowship - University of Toronto Canada,

Specialist in Ophthalmology - University of Toronto Canada, Specialist in vitreoretinal

disease Fellowship - Brazilian Centre for Eye Surgery.

e:

Hudson@nakamura.com

Modern vitreoretinal surgery and new trends in the treatment of retinal disorders

Hudson de Carvalho Nakamura

Goias Bank of Eyes Foundation, Brazil