Previous Page  3 / 19 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 19 Next Page
Page Background

allied

academies

Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Research

Volume 1 Issue 1

Clinical Pharmacy 2017

Notes:

Page 43

December 07-09, 2017 | Rome, Italy

7

th

World Congress on

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice

Clinical outcome and cisplatin excretion

influenced by GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1

ile105val polymorphisms in head and neck

squamous cell carcinoma patients treated

with cisplatin chemoradiation

¹Eder de Carvalho Pincinato, ²Anna Paula L Costa, ²Leisa Lopes-

Aguiar, ²Ericka F D Costa, ²Tathiane R P Lima, ²Patricia Moriel,

and

²Carmen Silvia P Lima

1

University of Campinas, Brazil

2

Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Brazil

Statement of the Problem:

Cisplatin (CDDP) associated

with radiotherapy (RT) is used in treatment of patients

with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

The responses to treatment as well as its side effects vary

among individuals, and this fact may be explained by the

genetic variability in metabolism of CDDP. The aim of this

study was to access if inherited ability to cellular CDDP

detoxification, mediated by GSTs enzymes alters the

therapeutic and side effects of CDDP and RT and urinary

concentration of CDDP in HNSCC patients.

Methodology & Theoretical Orientation:

We evaluated,

prospectively, 90 consecutive HNSCC patients, who

received CDDP plus RT as treatment. Genotypes of

GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphisms

were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction

(PCR) and PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion,

respectively, in peripheral blood DNA. Treatment side

effects as well as renal and hearing toxicities were ranked

through questionnaire and laboratory tests. Urinary doses

of CDDP were performed by high performance liquid

chromatography (HPLC).

Findings:

Patients with GSTT1 null genotype presented

less vomiting (20.0% vs. 64.4%; P=0.002), ototoxicity

(41.7% vs. 79.3%; P=0.03), nephrotoxicity (69.94±21.40

vs. 62.87±20.72 EDTA-51Cr mL/min/1.73m²; P=0.03) and

eliminates more CDDP (429.58±116.24 vs. 253.42±95.20

g CDDP/mg creatinine; P=0.04) than those with the

gene. Patients with GSTP1 Ile105Val homozygous variant

genotype had shorter progression-free survival and those

with GSTP1 Ile105Val homozygous wild genotype had

shorter overall survival.

Conclusion & Significance:

Our data indicate that

SCCHN patients with inherited distinct abilities for CDDP

metabolism, associated with GSTT1 and GSTP1 Ile105Val

polymorphisms, exhibit distinct toxicities to treatment and

urinary CDDP excretion. We believe that this data may

constitute preliminary basis of future personalized.

Biography

Eder de Carvalho Pincinato has completed his Doctor degree from University

of Campinas, Brazil. He is a Pharmacist, Assistant Professor of Hematology

and Coordinator of Pharmacy course at Mackenzie Presbyterian University.

eder.pincinato@mackenzie.br

Eder de Carvalho Pincinato et al., J Pharmacol Ther Res 2017