Previous Page  17 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

Page 80

Notes:

allied

academies

Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Research | Volume 3

November 26-27, 2018 | Dubai, UAE

Spine and Spine Disorders

Addiction Research and Therapy

3rd International Conference on

International Conference on

Joint Event

&

Comparative study of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after direct decompression with anterior column

reconstruction for Thoraco-lumbar burst fracture

Seul-Kee Lee, Ju-Hui Kim

and

Jung-Kil Lee

Chonnam National University Hospital &Medical School, South Korea

Background:

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures (TLBFs) are

among the most common spinal traumas, and its appropriate

management remains undetermined. This study aimed

to compare the clinical and radiological results between

anterior corpectomy and fusion technique versus posterior

decompression with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation

technique in the treatment of TLBFs.

Methods:

A total of 46 patients (from 2002 to 2015) with

TLBFs were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were

single-level Magerl type A3 burst fracture of the thoracolumbar

spine (T12–L2). These patients were divided into two groups:

Group A (22 patients) was treated by Anterior Corpectomy

with fusion, while Group B (24 patients) was treated by

posterior decompression with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw

Fixation (PPSF). For the radiologic parameters, Kyphosis angle

was measured preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at

the last follow-up using Cobb angle. The average correction in

degrees and loss of correction were calculated accordingly. All

neurological deficits were identified on the initial evaluation

and graded using the ASIA grading system. Operation time and

intraoperative blood loss were also measured.

Results:

The patients consisted of 17 males and 5 females in

Group A and 13 males and 11 females in Group B. The involved

levels were three T12, twelve L1, and seven L2 in Group A and

one T12, thirteen L1, and ten L2 in Group B. The average follow-

up period was 44.9 months in Group A and 14.7 months in

Group B. The corrections of kyphotic change were 6.4 degrees

in Group A and 9.2 degrees in Group B. Among the patient

with neurologic deficit, 11 of 15 patients in Group A and 20 of

23 patients in Group B demonstrated at least one ASIA grade

improvement on the final observation. However, there was no

significant differencebetween twogroups (p=0.13). Inaddition,

a shorter mean operating time and less mean perioperative

blood loss were observed in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.01

and p < 0.01, respectively; 167.3minutes and 305.9mL inGroup

A; 365 minutes and 1566.7 mL in Group B).

Conclusions:

Spinal Canal Decompression via a small

Laminotomy followed by PPSF in the treatment of TLBFs with

neurological deficits offers excellent biomechanical stability

with clinical and radiological improvement. Furthermore, it can

be a safe and effective surgical option with the advantages of

less invasiveness for the treatment of TLBFs.

e:

winnerlsk@hanmail.net