Previous Page  17 / 17
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 17
Page Background

Page 56

allied

academies

Journal of Current Pediatric Research | Volume: 23

March 14-15, 2019 | London, UK

International Conference on

Pediatrics & Neonatal Healthcare

M

RI is an amazing technology for diagnosis, especially

for the central nervous system, but is yet under-used

for imaging neonates. This is mainly due to the problems of

transporting the neonate from the caring environment of the

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to the MRI unit. This is often

a long journey in many hospitals and may even necessitate

an ambulance transfer, creating many logistical difficulties.

We have extensive experience of imaging neonates with MRI

units located within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

The first system was a specialised low field (0.2T) MRI system

using a permanent magnet which featured safe operation

with low acoustic noise and specific absorption rate (SAR)

for radiofrequency. Over 1000 babies were safely scanned

using this system providing an initial diagnosis, often within

hours of birth, allowing improved prognosis and treatment

options to the neonatal clinicians and timely information for

the parents. The system was installed in a space of 2m x 1m

and only required a single mains outlet. However, the image

quality associated with low field imaging is not competitive

with the latest generation high field superconducting magnet

systems. To this end, we have worked extensively with the

MRI manufacturer GE Healthcare to develop a compact 3T

MRI system and a system has now been installed in the NICU

for over 2-years for clinical evaluation. Image quality and

operational issues associated with the two systems will be

contrasted and compared. In addition, initial concepts for a

new, cost-effective neonatal MRI system will be presented.

e:

m.n.paley@sheffield.ac.uk

Comparing low field (Innervision) and high field (GE) dedicated Neonatal MRI systems

Martyn Paley

University of Sheffield, UK

Curr Pediatr Res, Volume 23

DOI: 10.4066/0971-9032-C1-012