Page 49
Note:
S e p t e m b e r 2 0 - 2 1 , 2 0 1 8 | R o m e , I t a l y
Joint Event on
OF EXCELLENCE
IN INTERNATIONAL
MEETINGS
alliedacademies.comYEARS
Dermatology Congress 2018 & World Nephrology 2018
Archives of General Internal Medicine
|
ISSN: 2591-7951
|
Volume 2
2
nd
WORLD NEPHROLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS CONGRESS
DERMATOLOGY AND TRICHOLOGY
&
International Congress on
Arch Gen Intern Med 2018, Volume 2 | DOI: 10.4066/2591-7951-C5-015
MONOCLONAL GAMMOPATHY OF RENAL SIGNIFICANCE: CASE REPORT
Fonseca GS
1
, Monteiro MLGR
1
, Zago L
1
, Machado JR
2
and
Reis MA
1
1
Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil
2
Federal University of Goiás, Brazil
Introduction:
The term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was proposed by the International Kidney and
Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group in 2012 to designate the deposition of monoclonal proteins in the kidney with organ
damage. Renal biopsy is fundamental for the investigation as it identifies the presence and pattern of renal monoclonal deposits
- whether organized or not.
Case report:
This is thecaseof a77-year-oldwoman, hospitalized inFebruary2017due toprogressivelyworsening renal insufficiency
lasting for a year, nephrotic syndrome and with indication of renal replacement therapy. Besides renal condition, she presented
bicytopenia (anemia and thrombocytopenia) and despite negative serum protein electrophoresis and negative immunofixation of
serum proteins, the immunofixation of urinary proteins showed a pattern suggestive of IgG/Kappa restriction. Considering the
possibility of adisease in the spectrumofmonoclonal gammopathies, amyelogramwasperformedwitha representative sampleand
showed no evidence of plasma cell infiltration (which excluded multiple myeloma). Renal biopsy revealed a membranoproliferative
patternwith subendothelial deposits of IgG, Kappa, Lambda, C3 and C1q in glomeruli. Electronmicroscopy evidencedmesangial and
subendothelial fibrillary deposits. Thus, the association of clinical-laboratorial and morphological data made the MGRS diagnosis
possible. However, there was no benefit in initiating chemotherapy as it was already an end-stage renal disease.
Conclusion:
Renal biopsy is mandatory for the diagnostic definition of this recently described entity, characterized by renal
deposition of monoclonal proteins originating from clones of small B-cells, and has therapeutic implications.