Previous Page  23 / 23
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 23
Page Background

allied

academies

Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Research

Volume 1 Issue 1

Clinical Pharmacy 2017

Notes:

Page 40

December 07-09, 2017 | Rome, Italy

7

th

World Congress on

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice

Doxorubicin versus Idarubicin with overall

survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia

patients

Sherein Mahmoud Ramadan Abdalla, Sherif HA, Rashed R, Rabea

A

and

Elshesheni HA

Cairo University, Egypt

Objective:

The main aim of this retrospective case

control study is to compare the response to doxorubicin

or idarubicin in adult AML patients during the induction

treatment related to patients of the Egyptian National

Cancer Institute (NCI).

Patients and methods:

143 patients from 18 to 60 years

of age with de novo AML were studied. We study the

patients who were admitted in the NCI from January 2013

to January 2016. Standard induction therapy with 3+7.

Cytarabine had to be given in a dose of 100 mg /m2/day

continuous for 7 days; anthracyclines are given for 3 days

being either doxorubicin (DXR) 45 mg /m2 or idarubicin

(IDR) 12 mg /m2. Patients were not eligible if they had

Promyelocytic leukemia.

Results:

Of the 143 patients, 97(67.8%) achieved CR.

Of the 67 patients in the IDR group, 46 (68.7%) achieved

CR, and of 76 in the DXR group, 51 (67.1%) obtained

CR (P=0.8386). In the IDR group, 41 patients (61.2%)

achieved CR after the first course, and in the DXR group,

46 (60.5%) did so (P =0.9320). Early death occurred in

15 (22.3%) in the IDA arm and 24 (31.5%) in the DOXO

arm which was not statistically significant (P=0.2189). 91

patients reached CR, 31 patients experienced relapse, 15

patients in the IDA arm and 16 patients in the DOXO arm.

The median OS was 8 months in IDA arm vs. 6 months

in DOXO (P=0.292). Of 67 patients in the IDR group,

41(61.2%) achieved CR by one induction cycle which cost

4296 EGP/patient (for IDR only) while in the DXR arm,

46(60.5%) obtained CR by one induction cycle which cost

946 EGP/patient (for DXR only).

Conclusion:

Patients who received IDR/Ara-C had no

significant difference compared with those who received

DXR/Ara-C as regards to CR rate, adverse events, and

incidence of relapse. DXR/Ara-C was effective in adult

patients less than age of 60 with newly diagnosed AML.

The low cost of DXR compared to IDR added value in the

treatment’s total cost is important specially for developing

countries like Egypt.

sherein14@hotmail.com

Sherein Mahmoud Ramadan Abdalla et al., J Pharmacol Ther Res 2017