Previous Page  15 / 27 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 27 Next Page
Page Background

Page 44

Notes:

allied

academies

August 27-28, 2018 | London, UK

International Conference on

Healthcare and Health Management

Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery

Joint Event

&

Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning | Volume: 2

Impact of PAD Guideline on Masih Daneshvari Hospital ICU

Seyed Mohammadreza Hashemian

1

, Batoul Khoundabi

and

Ala Farhang

1

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Background:

The Pain, Agitation, Delirium (PAD) guideline has

been reviewed and compiled by the American Chest Physicians

College and American Respiratory Medicine Association. This

guidelinewastranslatedintoPersianbyresidentsoftheIntensive

Care Unit (ICU) to implement that at Masih Daneshvari hospital.

Aim:

The study attempts to investigate the effects of the

implementation of this guideline on ICU and its impact on

patients.

Materials and Methods:

This study was done as a case-control

study. The variables related to admission in the hospital and

ICU and also the awakening and ventilator characteristics

of patients, were compared between two groups before

and after guideline implementation. 100 patients before

the implementation of the guideline and 120 patients after

the implementation of the guideline were included and the

variables were evaluated and compared in these patients.

Results:

The mean ages of patients in the pre-group and

post-group were 53.7±14.9 and 55.7±16.9 years, respectively

(P=0.894). 70.0% of the participants in the pre-group and 69.2%

in post-group, were men (P=0.930). The median APACHE score

was 24.8 in the pre-group and 20.4 post-group (P=0.863).

The average days spent in the ICU for the pre-group was 8.2

days, and for pre-group were 5.7 days (P=0.043). The average

length of stay in hospital was 20.3 days for the pre-group

and 14.8 days for the post-group. 16% of the patients in the

pre-group were treated with tracheostomy, while after PAD

implementation in post-group, this rate was reduced to 10%

(P=0.04). 16% of the patients in the pre-group had awake days

while receiving a sedative infusion, while that rate in post group

was 80% (P=0.012). 72 (72.0%) patients in the pre-group were

CI sedative while 55(45.8%) patients in post-group were CI

sedative (P=0.043). Also percent of patients in the pre-group

withwas significantly less than patients in post-group (P=0.037).

Conclusions:

The implementation of the protocol has led

to improved hospitalization, ICU, awakening and ventilator

indicators.

e

:

iran.criticalcare@yahoo.com