Previous Page  2 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Page 12

Arch Gen Intern Med 2017 | Volume 1 Issue 3

allied

academies

International Conference on

FAMILY MEDICINE AND FAMILY PHYSICIANS

October 16-17, 2017 | Toronto, Canada

I

recently attended on the cardiology consult service of an

academic medical center. It involved working with a talented

team of medicine interns, residents, and cardiology fellows

in assisting colleagues caring for patients with a variety of

cardiovascular issues. These consults were for patients not

admitted to a cardiovascular service and came from essentially

every medical and surgical specialty. At the presentation of

each new patient, it was helpful to know the reason for the

consult. For approximately 20% of the consults the reason

was that the patient had an elevated troponin level. Most

of these patients did not have an acute coronary syndrome.

The focus of this commentary is appropriate use of current

generation troponin tests. Acute coronary syndromes due

to coronary plaque rupture and thrombotic occlusion are a

major cause of morbidity and mortality and troponin assays

are helpful in detecting them.1 Troponin is a protein in striated

muscle that regulates excitation and contraction, and consists

of three molecules (C, I, and T.) Troponin I and T are specific

to cardiac tissue, and when released in the bloodstream are

markers for myocardial injury or stress.1-3 For patients with

signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia, a troponin assay

aids in early detection of acute coronary syndromes and saves

lives.1-3 Per the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial

Infarction global task force, troponin is now the biomarker of

choice when evaluating for classic myocardial infarction (type

1) that is due to acute occlusion (partial or full) of a coronary

artery.2 First generation troponin assays were highly predictive

of acute coronary syndromes and clinicians were conditioned

to make that diagnosis with any troponin elevation. This no

longer holds true. Now in their fourth or fifth generation,

troponin assays yield elevated levels for a number of conditions

besides acute coronary syndrome.2-5 In a series of 12,553

hospitalized patients using a current assay, over 40% with an

elevated troponin did not have a thrombotic coronary event,

and the positive predictive value for diagnosing acute coronary

syndrome was 56%; with a troponin level of 1.0 ng/ml or

lower it was 48% or less.4 When not due to decreased renal

clearance, troponin elevations may be an indication of cardiac

myocyte strain or injurywithout thrombotic coronary occlusion,

when the heart is an “innocent bystander” during a severe non-

cardiac condition.3,5 This type of acute injury to themyocardial

cells is designated as a type 2 myocardial infarction (myocardial

necrosis where a condition other than coronary artery disease

contributes to an imbalance betweenmyocardial oxygen supply

and/or demand 2); it is anticipated that type 2 myocardial

infarction will be added as an ICD-10 code in October, 2017.

Proposed mechanisms of cardiac injury in these patients

include circulating inflammatory cytokines and elevated

catecholamines.5Conditions thatmay cause troponindetection

with current assays include tachycardia (from essentially any

cause), hypotension, hypertension, strenuous exercise (e.g.

marathon runners), sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary embolus,

heart failure, pericarditis, polymyositis, rhabdomyolysis, burns,

cardiac trauma, respiratory failure, ventricular hypertrophy, drug

toxicity (including cancer chemotherapy) andneurally-mediated

sympathetic activation.2-5 Advanced age may be added to this

list; one recent study found that 41% of patients over age 70

presenting to the ED in whom both acute coronary syndrome

and other known non-thrombotic coronary syndrome causes

were ruled out had troponin elevations.6

This relatively new phenomenon of elevated troponin levels in

patients not having an acute coronary syndrome may lead to

overlooking the appropriate diagnosis and thus inappropriate

treatments, increased costs of tests and services, increased

length of stay, and unindicated procedures.7 For example,

when patients with gastrointestinal bleeding or intracranial

hemorrhage have elevated troponin results, treatment for

acute coronary syndrome with antiplatelet or anticoagulant

medication is antithetical to their primary diagnosis. Likewise,

giving a beta blocker for a positive troponin to a hypotensive

Gregory D Chapman

University of Alabama, USA

Occam, Hickam, troponin and appropriate use - A commentary on the clinical efficacy

of a frequently requested and useful lab test