Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  5 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

Dental Congress 2019

Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health | Volume 3

Page 19

OF EXCELLENCE

IN INTERNATIONAL

MEETINGS

alliedacademies.com

YEARS

April 15-16, 2019 | Milan, Italy

DENTISTRY

AND ORAL HEALTH

2

nd

International Conference on

AN INNOVATIVE WAY FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT AT ESTHETIC AREA – ROOT

MEMBRANE TECHNIQUE

Ho Chia-Ming

Asia Pacific Association of Implant Dentistry, Taiwan

Background:

Single implant at anterior esthetic area always is the biggest challenge to dentists. Especially

in Asia, most of the patients are thin biotype gingiva with underlying thin buccal plate. Once the tooth was

extracted, the buccal plate and gingiva start to recess immediately, and the look of the anterior area is very

hard to be harmonious. From the literature review and our experience, immediate implant placement with

traditional Atraumatic extraction is not enough to keep the hard and soft tissue. Therefore, we are trying to find

a new way to solve this problem.

Aim:

The aim of these case reports is trying to use root membrane technique to keep the hard and soft tissue

at anterior esthetic area after implant placement.

Materials & Methods:

Case 1:

A 66 y/o female whose tooth #11 was fractured and the old post crown were loose.

Remove the crown portion to the CEJ and left no caries or calculus.

Separate the root mesial-distally.

Remove the palatal part of the root.

Different from Dr Hurzeler’s method, we thinning the buccal part of root to 1mm to create enough

room for further GBR procedure. Vertical reduction of the buccal part of the root to establish the bio-

logical width.

Place the implant with CAD/CAM surgical template to make sure we place the implant at the accurate

position and angulation.

Perform the GBR procedure.

Connect the abutment and preformed temporary crown

After 1 year follow up, there is no obvious recession of bone or gingiva.

Case 2:

A 40 y/o male whose tooth #23 was fractured. We use root membrane technique, following form step 1

to step 8 to treat the patient. After 1 year follow up, both frompicture and X-ray, there was no obvious recession

of the soft and hard tissue.

Result:

We successfully preserve the “tooth-bone-gingiva” complex, and place the implant at the precise posi-

tion to create sufficient space for GBR procedure. After 1-year follow up, the hard and soft tissue stay steady by

using root membrane technique.

Conclusion:

Single implant at anterior esthetic area always is the biggest challenge to dentists. According to

the socket shield technique, we try our best to preserve the “tooth-bone-gingiva” complex to perform the At-

Ho Chia-Ming, J Clin Dentistry Oral Health 2019, Volume 3