Previous Page  17 / 25 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 25 Next Page
Page Background

Page 45

allied

academies

February 25-26, 2019 | Paris, France

13

th

World Cancer Congress

Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics | Volume 4

Comparison of adverse drug reactions and health related quality of life in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

patients treated with AC-Taxane+carboplatin Vs AC-Taxane regimen: A prospective cohort study

Mrs Faheema Nafees

Treatment in Breast Cancer, UAE

A

nthracycline-Taxane containing regimen is the standard

treatment for curative breast cancer chemotherapy

from last two decades. Recent evidences showed improved

efficacy when platinum compounds added to Anthracycline-

Taxane containing regimen in any clinical setting (neoadjuvant,

adjuvant and metastatic) for treating Triple Negative Breast

Cancer (TNBC). But safety data on each regimen in TNBC is

limiting although established data available on individual drug

only. A crucial factor is to understand the impact of therapy

on Quality of Life (QoL) of patients as it is influenced by every

step of the treatment. In this prospective, cohort questionnaire

based study, we evaluated whether ADRs and QoL from 2

different chemotherapy regimens differed in patients with

triple negative breast cancer.

The study was conducted in the Dept. of Radiotherapy, Govt.

Medical College, Calicut, India over a period of 8 months from

January 2017 to August. Patients with TNBC who satisfied

eligibility criteria were selected and divided into 2 groups based

on their chemotherapy regimen. The patients who received

Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by docetaxel

(T) were assigned to group AC-T and those who received AC

followed by docetaxel and carboplatin (Cb) were in group AC-

TCb. List of ADRs were prepared using Cancer Care Ontario

(CCO) drug formulary list. ADRs documented either from the

patients or from their laboratory reports were graded as per

NCI CTCAE guidelines. QoL mean scores were analyzed using

EORTC QLQ C30 and EORTC QLQ BR23 questionnaires filled up

by the patients during the study. Statistical analysis were done

using PASW statistics 18, version 2009.

Data of 81 TNBC patients were collected in which 29 (35.8%)

patients received AC-T and 52 (64.2%) AC-TCb regimens.

Mean age of AC-T was 50.28±9.071 and 49.87±9.30 years

for AC-TCb. Among thirteen system organ classification

studied, ADRs in dermatological system, gastrointestinal (P

value=0.644), cardiovascular (P value=0.131), ophthalmological

(P value=0.533), neurological (P value=0.904), musculoskeletal

(P value=0.066), auditory (P value=0.452), psychological (P

value=0.303), hematological (P value=0.753), administration

site (P value=0.252), respiratory (P value=0.094), were

statistically insignificant. A statistically significant difference in

ADRs under general disorders was confirmed among different

chemotherapy regimens and confined to AC-TCb regimen (P

value=0.011). Hand-foot syndrome, grade 3 was present in 1

subject from AC-T and 1 from AC-TCb; 1 subject from AC-T with

grade 4. Vomiting, grade 4 type was present for one subject

from AC-TCb. Constipation, grade 3 type was present for one

subject from AC-TCb. Mucositis grade 4 type was observed

from one subject each in AC-T and AC-TCb. Diarrhea, grade

3 was reported from a subject receiving AC-TCb. Although

hematological reactions were a few, most of them belongs to

grade 3/4. Anemia, grade 3/4 was reported in 1 from AC-T, 1

from AC-TCb.

Febrile neutropenia, grade 3/4 was observed in 4 subjects from

AC-T and 5 fromAC-TCb. 10 subjects fromAC-T and 12 fromAC-

TCb had neutropenia, grade 3/4. 9 subjects from AC-T, 8 from

AC-TCb had insomnia, grade 3/4. One subject from AC-T had

hearing impaired, grade 4.

QoL mean score was insignificant among the regimen. Among

EORTC QLQ C30 functional scale, emotional, cognitive and

social domains shows significant difference; higher mean

scores were observed for subjects receiving AC-TCb for all these

three {(62.7, P = 0.046), (74.3, P=0.000) and (66.02, p=0.010)

respectively}. Higher functional scale score indicates better

functioning and quality of life. Among EORTCQLQC30 symptom

scale, a significant difference in the mean scores were observed

in dyspnea and constipation domains; for both, the higher

mean scores were reported for subjects receiving AC-T {(35.6,

P = 0.001) and (48.7, P=0.046) respectively}. Higher symptom

score indicates poor quality of life. All the domains from both

functional and symptom scale in EORTC QLQ BR 23 found to be

insignificant among the groups.

Both regimens were tolerated by the subjects reasonably very

well with majority of adverse effects were mild. Severe (Grade

3 or 4) adverse effects were rare. In our study ADRs from two

different taxane based chemotherapy regimens were observed

statistically insignificant except in general disorders while

QoL, functional domains of breast and disability due to breast

symptoms were independent of the chemotherapy regimens

showing that no regimen is superior to another. On the other

hand, three variables from the functional and two from

symptom scale indicate carboplatin based chemotherapy is

better in TNBC compared to taxane alone. The major limitation

of this study was the small sample size and shorter duration.

Amore comprehensive study with a greater number of patients

is required to get more conclusive results.

e:

faheemakandoth@gmail.com