Previous Page  2 / 8 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 2 / 8 Next Page
Page Background

Page 10

Notes:

allied

academies

Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences | Volume 8

May 14-15, 2018 | Montreal, Canada

Global Summit on

Biopharma & Biotherapeutics

T

he International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M9:

Biopharmaceutics Classification System-Based Biowaivers

was recently adopted. A biowaiver allows for

in vitro

testing to

be used in lieu of

in vivo

bioavailability and/or bioequivalence

studies to facilitate product approval, where solubility and

permeability are not expected to impede bioavailability. ICHM9

should minimize unnecessary

in vivo

studies in man and allow

greater public access to medicines. However, this approach is

not always universally aligned or recognized. The biggest area

of concern is whether solubility should be based on the highest

therapeutic dose or on the highest strength of the medicinal

product. Different approaches to assessing permeability, i.e.

in

vitro

or

in vivo

assessments, will also require harmonization.

Thus, far biowaivers have been restricted to pharmaceutical

equivalents and primarily to BCS class I compounds. There

has been widespread concern regarding the effect of different

excipientsonthepermeabilityofthedrugsubstanceandthereby

the bioavailability of different formulations. For example, FDA

guidance states, “Unlike for BCS class 1 products, for a biowaiver

to be scientifically justified, BCS class 3 test drug product

must contain the same excipients as the reference product.

This is due to the concern that excipients can have a greater

impact on absorption of low permeability drugs.” Whilst, it is

certainly true that “certain excipients, such as surfactants (e.g.,

polysorbate 80) and sweeteners (e.g., mannitol or sorbitol) may

be problematic”, it is by no means true that all excipients can

adversely influence absorption. Consequently, ICH M9 faces

significant challenges and a target date of 2Q 2019 for step 4

implementation may be difficult to achieve.

Speaker Biography

David P Elder has nearly 40 years of service within the pharmaceutical industry

(Sterling, Syntex and for the last two decades with GSK). He is now an independent

CMC Consultant and has broad based experience in excipients, biopharmaceutics, drug

product and analytical method development. He obtained his PhD in crystallography

from the University of Edinburgh. He is a visiting Professor at King’s College, London.

He is a member of the British Pharmacopoeia. He is the immediate past Chairman of

JPAG (Joint Pharmaceutical Analysis Group). He is a member of the Editorial Advisory

Board for the

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

. He has published 114 and presented

17 webinars and 133 presentations. He has Co-edited one book on the analytical

characterization and separation of oligonucleotides and their impurities (with George

Okafo and Mike Webb) and is editing a second book on the ICH quality guidelines (with

Andy Teasdale, AZ).

e:

davidelder2110@gmail.com

David P Elder

GlaxoSmithKline, UK

ICHM9 Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based Biowaivers:

Challenges and opportunities