Previous Page  3 / 22 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

Page 35

S e p t e m b e r 0 6 - 0 7 , 2 0 1 8 | B a n g k o k , T h a i l a n d

Note:

allied

academies

Joint Event on

Global Women Health 2018 & Orthopedics Congress 2018

Archives of General Internal Medicine

|

ISSN: 2591-7951

|

Volume 2

BREAST CANCER, GYNECOLOGY AND WOMEN HEALTH

ORTHOPEDICS AND RHEUMATOLOGY

&

World Congress on

Annual Conference on

Subhan Arif Rahman et al., Arch Gen Intern Med 2018, Volume 2 | DOI: 10.4066/2591-7951-C3-009

THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE AND SIDE EF-

FECTS OF CHEMOTERAPHY COMBINATION

REGIMEN BETWEEN PACLITAXEL-CISPLA-

TIN AND PACLITAXEL-CARBOPLATIN ON

CERVICAL CANCER STAGE IIB

Subhan Arif Rahman, Sharvianty Arifuddin, Nusratuddin

Abdullah, Maisuri T Chalid, Nugraha U P

and

Effendi Lukas

Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

Background:

To compare therapeutic response and side effects of

chemoteraphy combination regimen between paclitaxel-cisplatin and

paclitaxel-carboplatin on cervical cancer stage IIB.

Methods:

32 patients with stage II B cervical cancer that diagnosed by

physical examination and CT scans were included in the study. Chemotherapy

combination regimen paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in group

one (16 patients) compared with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and Carboplatin 300

mg/m2 in group 2 (16 patients). The tumor volume was measured in three

dimensions with computed tomography scan (CT scan) before and after six

cycles. Clinical response is evaluated by physical examination.

Result:

The average tumor volume decreases significantly (73.41% vs. 75.65%

in groups 1 and 2, respectively, P=0.001), complete response rate (25% vs.

31.2%), and partial response (62.5% vs. 56.2%), progressive response rate

(12.5% vs. 6.2%), with p>0.05 which means no significant differences on

complete response rate, partial response rate and progressive response rate

between groups of carboplatin nor cisplatin group. Class three toxicity (CTC

criteria) were more dominant in the cisplatin group, nausea and vomiting

(12.5%), and hematologic grade three grade hematologic toxicity symptoms

in both groups (12.5% vs. 12.5%)

Conclussion:

Chemotheraphy combination regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin

proved to be more effective in reduction of tumor size with fewer side effects

compared to the paclitaxel-cisplatin combination regimen in stage IIB cervical

cancer.

Subhan.arifrahman@yahoo.com