Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Perspective - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 3

Why radiation therapy is a cornerstone of cancer care.

Shinsuke Seki *

Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Shinsuke Seki
Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Japan
E-mail: s.seki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Received: 03-Jun -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-138052; Editor assigned: 04-Jun-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-138052 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Jun-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-138052; Revised:24-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-138052 (R); Published:01-Jul-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.3.214

Citation: Seki S., Why radiation therapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(3):214

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

In the ongoing battle against cancer, radiation therapy has emerged as a cornerstone of care, playing a pivotal role in the treatment and management of various types of malignancies. From its humble beginnings over a century ago to the sophisticated techniques available today, radiation therapy has continuously evolved, offering patients targeted, effective, and often life-saving treatment options. This article explores the multifaceted reasons why radiation therapy is indispensable in the comprehensive care of cancer patients [1].

The roots of radiation therapy trace back to the late 19th century with the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen. This groundbreaking discovery paved the way for the use of ionizing radiation in medical applications. Early pioneers in the field, such as Marie Curie and Emil Grubbe, experimented with radiation for therapeutic purposes, laying the foundation for modern radiation oncology [2].

Over the decades, technological advancements have revolutionized radiation therapy, enhancing its precision, safety, and efficacy. From the development of linear accelerators and computerized treatment planning systems to the integration of advanced imaging modalities like CT and MRI, radiation therapy has undergone a remarkable transformation, enabling clinicians to target tumors with unprecedented accuracy while sparing healthy surrounding tissues [3].

Radiation therapy exerts its anti-cancer effects by damaging the DNA of tumor cells, thereby impairing their ability to proliferate and survive. When high-energy radiation is delivered to the tumor site, it induces a cascade of molecular and cellular changes, ultimately leading to cell death. Unlike systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, which affect both cancerous and healthy cells throughout the body, radiation therapy can be precisely directed to the tumor, minimizing damage to adjacent normal tissues [4].

Two primary modalities of radiation therapy are external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. EBRT involves delivering radiation from a machine outside the body, whereas brachytherapy entails the placement of radioactive sources directly into or near the tumor. Both modalities have unique applications and can be used alone or in combination with other treatments, such as surgery and chemotherapy, depending on the specific characteristics of the cancer and the patient's individual needs [5].

One of the key strengths of radiation therapy lies in its versatility and effectiveness across a wide spectrum of cancer types and stages. From localized early-stage tumors to advanced metastatic disease, radiation therapy can be tailored to target tumors of varying sizes and locations. It is utilized in the curative setting with the intent to eradicate cancer cells, as well as in the palliative setting to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life for patients with advanced or incurable disease [6].

Radiation therapy is commonly employed in the treatment of solid tumors, including but not limited to breast, lung, prostate, head and neck, brain, and gastrointestinal cancers. It is also an essential component of the management of certain hematologic malignancies, such as lymphomas and leukemia. In many cases, radiation therapy serves as an integral part of multidisciplinary treatment approaches, complementing surgery and systemic therapies to achieve optimal outcomes for patients [7].

While radiation therapy is highly effective in targeting cancer cells, minimizing side effects and preserving quality of life for patients are paramount considerations. Modern radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), allow for precise dose delivery while minimizing exposure to surrounding normal tissues [8].

Furthermore, advances in treatment planning and delivery have enabled the development of hypofractionated radiation schedules, which deliver higher doses of radiation over fewer treatment sessions. This approach not only reduces the overall duration of treatment but also enhances convenience for patients and improves treatment compliance [9].

The field of radiation oncology is continuously advancing, driven by ongoing research and innovation aimed at further improving outcomes and reducing toxicities associated with treatment. Emerging technologies, such as proton therapy and carbon ion therapy, offer the potential for even greater precision and sparing of healthy tissues, particularly for tumors located near critical structures [10].

conclusion

In conclusion, radiation therapy has rightfully earned its place as a cornerstone of cancer care, offering patients a powerful weapon in the fight against cancer. Its ability to deliver targeted treatment while minimizing side effects underscores its importance in the comprehensive management of cancer. As technology continues to evolve and our understanding of the complexities of cancer biology deepens, radiation therapy will remain an indispensable tool in the arsenal of oncologists, providing hope and healing to patients around the world.

References

  1. Hopewell JW. Radiation?therapy effects on bone density. Med Pediat Oncol. 2003;41(3):208-11.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Gross NJ. Pulmonary effects of radiation therapy. Ann Intern 1977;86(1):81-92.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Xing L, Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, Li TF, Kim GY, Luxton G, Koong A. Overview of image-guided radiation therapy. Med Dosimet. 2006;31(2):91-112.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Demaria S, Golden EB, Formenti SC. Role of local radiation therapy in cancer immunotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(9):1325-32.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Berkey FJ. Managing the adverse effects of radiation therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Aug 15;82(4):381-8.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  6. Purdy JA. Dose to normal tissues outside the radiation therapy patient’s treated volume: a review of different radiation therapy techniques. Health Phy. 2008;95(5):666-76.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Palma DA, Verbakel WF, Otto K, Senan S. New developments in arc radiation therapy: a review. Cancer Treatment Rev. 2010;36(5):393-9.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Sheets NC, Goldin GH, Meyer AM, Wu Y, Chang Y, Stürmer T, Holmes JA, Reeve BB, Godley PA, Carpenter WR, Chen RC. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. Jama. 2012;307(15):1611-20.

    9. Google Scholar

  9. Aggarwal A, Lewison G, Rodin D, Zietman A, Sullivan R, Lievens Y. Radiation therapy research: a global analysis 2001-2015. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101(4):767-78.

    10. Google Scholar

  10. Konefal JB, Pilepich MV, Spector GJ, Perez CA. Radiation therapy in the treatment of chemodectomas. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(11):1331-5.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar

Get the App