Opinion Article - Journal of Molecular Oncology Research (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4
Tumor markers: A critical tool in cancer diagnosis and management
Rosy Zhang*
Department of Cancer, London University, UK
Received: 01-July-2024, Manuscript No. AAMOR-24-149827; Editor assigned: 02-July-2024, PreQC No. AAMOR-24-149827 (PQ); Reviewed:15-July-2024, QC No. AAMOR-24-149827; Revised:19-July-2024, Manuscript No. AAMOR -24-149827 (R); Published:26-Oct-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aaijrm -8.4.247
Citation: Zhang R. Tumor markers: A critical tool in cancer diagnosis and management. J Mol Oncol Res. 2024;8(4):247
Introduction
Tumor markers are biomolecules often produced by cancer cells or the body in response to cancer. These markers can be proteins, hormones, enzymes, or genetic material that can be detected in the blood, urine, or tissue samples. As crucial indicators of cancer, tumor markers are invaluable in early detection, diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognosis. Although not solely diagnostic, their role in complementing other diagnostic tools like imaging and biopsy is vital. In this article, we will explore the types of tumor markers, their clinical applications, and the potential they hold in the future of oncology [1, 2].
There are several types of tumor markers, each associated with specific cancers. For instance, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is used for prostate cancer, while Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) is a marker for colorectal cancer. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is elevated in liver cancer, and CA-125 is associated with ovarian cancer. These markers vary in sensitivity and specificity, and often multiple markers are combined to increase the accuracy of diagnosis. However, elevated levels do not always mean cancer is present, as benign conditions can also raise marker levels [3, 4].
Tumor markers play a key role in diagnosing cancers when used alongside other tests. By measuring the concentration of these markers, clinicians can identify the presence of cancerous cells. For patients already diagnosed, tumor markers are used to monitor the effectiveness of treatments such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. If the levels of markers decrease, it may indicate the treatment is working. Conversely, if the levels rise, it could suggest a recurrence or that the cancer is not responding to treatment [5, 6].
Tumor markers not only help in diagnosing cancer but also provide valuable information about a patient’s prognosis. High levels of specific markers at the time of diagnosis may indicate a more aggressive form of cancer or a greater risk of recurrence. For example, elevated levels of HER2 in breast cancer patients are linked with a higher likelihood of cancer returning, influencing decisions regarding the use of targeted therapies. Thus, tumor markers guide personalized treatment strategies and help estimate survival rates [7, 8 ].
While tumor markers hold significant promise, they are not without limitations. False positives and false negatives can occur, and not all cancers produce detectable markers. However, ongoing research in genomics and proteomics is leading to the discovery of new, more specific tumor markers. Liquid biopsy, a non-invasive method of detecting cancer cells or DNA in the blood, represents a revolutionary advancement in this field, enabling early detection and better monitoring of metastatic cancer. Despite these advancements, further research is essential to improve the accuracy and reliability of tumor markers [9, 10].
Conclusion
Tumor markers are an essential part of the cancer diagnosis and management toolkit, offering clinicians a non-invasive way to detect, monitor, and prognosticate cancer. While they cannot yet replace traditional diagnostic methods like imaging or biopsy, their role in personalized medicine continues to expand. As research progresses, the discovery of more specific and sensitive markers could transform cancer care, leading to earlier detection, improved treatment outcomes, and better survival rates for patients.
References
- Wadowska K, Bil-Lula I, Trembecki ?, et al. Genetic markers in lung cancer diagnosis: A review. Internat J Molecul Sci. 2020;21(13):4569.
- Laraib U, Sargazi S, Rahdar A, et al. Nanotechnology-based approaches for effective detection of tumor markers: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review. Internat J Biolog Macromolec. 2022;195:356-83.
- Johnson P, Zhou Q, Dao DY, et al. Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Rev Gastroen Hepatolo. 2022;19(10):670-81.
- Kartikasari AE, Huertas CS, Mitchell A, et al. Tumor-induced inflammatory cytokines and the emerging diagnostic devices for cancer detection and prognosis. Front Oncolo. 2021 ;11:692142.
- Liu C, Chu D, Kalantar?Zadeh K, et al G. Cytokines: From clinical significance to quantification. Advc Sci. 2021;8(15):2004433.
- Campos-Carrillo A, Weitzel JN, Sahoo P, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as an early cancer detection tool. Pharmacol Therapeut. 2020;207:107458.
- Sarhadi VK, Armengol G. Molecular biomarkers in cancer. Biomole . 2022;12(8):1021.
- Kwong GA, Ghosh S, Gamboa L, et al. Synthetic biomarkers: A twenty-first century path to early cancer detection. Nature Revs Canc. 2021;21(10):655-68.
- Hayes DF. Defining clinical utility of tumor biomarker tests: A clinician's viewpoint. J Clin Oncolo. 2021;39(3):238-48.
- Cucchiara F, Scarpitta R, Crucitta S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment monitoring in breast cancer: how liquid biopsy can support patient management. Pharmacoge. 2022;23(2):119-34.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref