Mini Review - Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Diagnosis and Therapy (2024) Volume 9, Issue 3

Towards a preventive strategy for toxoplasmosis: current trends, challenges, and future perspectives for vaccine development

Lyn-Marié Birkholtz ^*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

*Corresponding Author:

Lyn-Marié Birkholtz
Department of Biochemistry, Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control
Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria,
South Africa
E-mail: vcasadoanguera01@gmail.com

Received:08-Jun-2024,Manuscript No. AAPDDT-24-144682; Editor assigned:10-Jun-2024,PreQC No. AAPDDT-24-144682(PQ); Reviewed:24-Jun-2024,QC No. AAPDDT-24-144682; Revised:27-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. AAPDDT-24-144682(R); Published:04-Jul-2024,DOI:10.35841/aapddt-9.3.189

Citation: Birkholtz L T. Towards a preventive strategy for toxoplasmosis: current trends, challenges, and future perspectives for vaccine development, J Parasit Dis Diagn Ther. 2024; 9(3):189

Abstract

Parasite control plays a pivotal role in global health and agriculture, aiming to mitigate the impact of parasitic infections on human and animal populations. This mini-review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies employed in parasite control, discusses the challenges faced in their implementation, and explores promising avenues for future research and innovation.

Introduction

Parasitic infections remain a significant public health concern, affecting billions of people and numerous animal species worldwide [1]. Effective parasite control strategies are essential for reducing morbidity, mortality, and economic losses associated with these infections. This review examines the current state of parasite control, highlighting key approaches and their limitations [2]

Classical approaches to parasite control

Chemotherapy: Antiparasitic drugs have been the cornerstone of parasite control for decades. We delve into the development and usage of drugs targeting various parasites, discussing challenges such as drug resistance and the need for novel therapeutic agents. Vector control: Controlling the vectors responsible for transmitting parasitic infections is crucial. The review explores methods such as insecticide-treated bed nets, indoor residual spraying, and biological control strategies for managing vector-borne diseases. Vaccination: Vaccination has proven successful in preventing certain parasitic infections. We assess the progress and challenges in developing vaccines against parasites [3, 4, 5], emphasizing the importance of immunization in integrated control programs.

Integrated parasite control

Future perspectives

Targeted therapies: Advancements in molecular biology and genomics open new avenues for developing targeted therapies against parasites. The review explores the potential of precision medicine and personalized treatment approaches. Biological control: Harnessing the natural enemies of parasites, such as predatory organisms and symbiotic microbes, presents an eco-friendly alternative for parasite control. We discuss the progress and challenges in implementing biological control strategies. Technological innovations: Emerging technologies, including CRISPR-based gene editing and advanced imaging techniques hold promise for parasite control. We explore how these innovations may revolutionize our ability to study and combat parasitic infections [10].

Conclusion

Parasite control is a dynamic field that requires ongoing adaptation to the evolving challenges posed by parasites. This mini-review emphasizes the importance of a multifaceted, integrated approach to control strategies, incorporating innovative technologies and collaborative efforts to address the complex nature of parasitic infections. As we continue to refine and expand our understanding of parasites, the development and implementation of effective control measures will remain essential for improving global health and well-being..

References

References

Yu B, Zhao X, Yang C, Crane J, Xian L, Lu W, Wan M, Cao X. Parathyroid hormone induces differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells by enhancing bone morphogenetic protein signaling. JBMR. 2012;27(9):2001-14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Martin A, David V, Quarles LD. Regulation and function of the FGF23/klotho endocrine pathways. Physiol Rev. 2012.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Wu Y, Xie L, Wang M, Xiong Q, Guo Y, Liang Y, Li J, Sheng R, Deng P, Wang Y, Zheng R. Mettl3-mediated m6A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis. Nat  Commun. 2018;9(1):4772.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Mace ML, Olgaard K, Lewin E. New aspects of the kidney in the regulation of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and mineral homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8810.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Nabeshima YI, Imura H. α-Klotho: a regulator that integrates calcium homeostasis. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(3):455-64.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Tseng YT, Tsai HC, Sy CL, et al. Clinical manifestations of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: 18 years’ experience in a medical center in southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44(5):382-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Eamsobhana P, Yong HS. Immunological diagnosis of human angiostrongyliasis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae). Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2009;13(4):425-31.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Urban Jr JF, Madden KB, Svetica A, et al. The importance of Th2 cytokines in protective immunity to nematodes. Immunological reviews. 1992;127(1):205-20.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Morassutti AL, Levert K, Pinto PM, et al. Characterization of Angiostrongylus cantonensis excretory–secretory proteins as potential diagnostic targets. Exp Parasitol. 2012;130(1):26-31.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Ishida K, Yoshimura K. Eosinophil responses of permissive and no permissive hosts to the young adult worms of Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Journal of Parasitics. 1986;72(5):661-71.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref