Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Short Communication - Archives of Industrial Biotechnology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

The role of proteomics in biomarker discovery and validation

Tahereh Carpenter*

Department of Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Tahereh Carpenter
Department of Institute for Health and the Environment
University at Albany
USA
E-mail:tcarpenter@albany.edu

Received: 23-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144202; Editor assigned: 25-Jul-2024, PreQC No. AAAIB-24-144202 (PQ); Reviewed: 06-Aug-2024, QC No. AAAIB-24-144202; Revised: 17-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144202 (R); Published: 22-Aug-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaaib- 8.4.218

Citation: Carpenter T. The role of proteomics in biomarker discovery and validation. Arch Ind Biot. 2024; 8(4):218

Visit for more related articles at Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

Proteomics, the large-scale study of proteins, has emerged as a powerful tool in the field of biomarker discovery and validation. Biomarkers, which are biological molecules that indicate a physiological or pathological state, are essential in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Proteomics enables the identification and quantification of proteins in various biological samples, providing insights into disease mechanisms and identifying potential biomarkers [1], [2]

MS is a cornerstone of proteomics, allowing the precise identification and quantification of proteins in complex biological samples. Techniques such as tandem MS (MS/MS) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) are widely used for biomarker discovery. These methods enable the analysis of protein expression, post-translational modifications, and protein-protein interactions, providing comprehensive proteomic profiles. 2-DE separates proteins based on their isoelectric point and molecular weight. Coupled with MS, 2-DE facilitates the identification of differentially expressed proteins between healthy and diseased states, making it a valuable tool for biomarker discovery. Methods like stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) allow the comparison of protein abundance across multiple samples. These techniques enhance the accuracy of quantitative proteomics and aid in identifying potential biomarkers. Protein microarrays enable high-throughput analysis of protein interactions, modifications, and functions. They are used to screen for potential biomarkers by analyzing protein expression patterns in different disease states [3].

Biological samples, such as blood or tissue, contain a vast array of proteins with varying abundance levels. Detecting low-abundance proteins, which are often potential biomarkers, amidst highly abundant ones poses a significant challenge. The large datasets generated by proteomic studies require sophisticated bioinformatics tools for analysis. Interpreting these data to identify meaningful biomarkers necessitates robust statistical methods and validation techniques Variability in protein expression due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors can complicate the identification of reliable biomarkers. Large and diverse cohorts are needed to account for this variability [4], [5]

Ensuring the reproducibility of proteomic experiments is critical for biomarker validation. Variations in sample preparation, instrumentation, and data analysis can impact results, necessitating standardized protocols. Potential biomarkers identified through proteomics must undergo rigorous clinical validation to confirm their diagnostic or prognostic utility. This involves testing the biomarkers in independent cohorts and diverse populations to establish their sensitivity, specificity, and clinical relevance [6], [7]

Understanding the biological function and relevance of a biomarker is crucial. Functional validation involves studying the biomarker’s role in disease mechanisms, often through in vitro and in vivo experiments. For biomarkers to be used in clinical practice, they must meet regulatory standards for safety, efficacy, and reliability. This process involves extensive validation and compliance with guidelines set by regulatory bodies such as the FDA. Combining proteomics with genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics provides a holistic view of biological processes, enhancing biomarker discovery. Continued improvements in MS sensitivity, resolution, and throughput will enable the detection of low-abundance biomarkers and the analysis of small sample volumes [8], [9]

Analyzing proteomic profiles at the single-cell level offers insights into cellular heterogeneity and disease mechanisms, paving the way for personalized medicine. AI and machine learning algorithms can handle large proteomic datasets, identifying patterns and potential biomarkers with greater accuracy and efficiency. Proteomics plays a pivotal role in biomarker discovery and validation, offering comprehensive insights into protein expression and function. Despite challenges, advancements in proteomic techniques and bioinformatics are driving the identification of novel biomarkers, with significant implications for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. As technology continues to evolve, proteomics is set to transform personalized medicine, enabling more precise and effective healthcare interventions [10].

References

  1. Mann M, Kumar C, Zeng WF, et al. Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 2021;12(8):759-70.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Xiao Y, Bi M, Guo H, et al. Multi-omics approaches for biomarker discovery in early ovarian cancer diagnosis. EBioMedicine. 2022;79.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Wu J, Wang W, Chen Z, et al. Proteomics applications in biomarker discovery and pathogenesis for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2021;18(4):305-14.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Zhu G, Jin L, Sun W, et al. Proteomics of post-translational modifications in colorectal cancer: Discovery of new biomarkers. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022;1877(4):188735.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Wu X, You C. The biomarkers discovery of hyperuricemia and gout: proteomics and metabolomics. Peer J. 2023;11:e14554.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Sirikaew N, Pruksakorn D, Chaiyawat P, et al. Mass Spectrometric-based proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Osteosarcoma: current status and future direction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9741.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Ding Z, Wang N, Ji N, et al. Proteomics technologies for cancer liquid biopsies. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):53.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Bai B, Vanderwall D, Li Y, et al. Proteomic landscape of Alzheimer’s Disease: novel insights into pathogenesis and biomarker discovery. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):55.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Ma JY, Sze YH, Bian JF, et al. Critical role of mass spectrometry proteomics in tear biomarker discovery for multifactorial ocular diseases. Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(5):1-5.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Swietlik JJ, Bärthel S, Falcomatà C, et al. Cell-selective proteomics segregates pancreatic cancer subtypes by extracellular proteins in tumors and circulation. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2642.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App