Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Perspective - Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

The Psychological Impact of Cosmetic Resurfacing: Boosting Confidence and Self-Esteem

Thomas Strauss *

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Thomas Strauss
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
E-mail: tho.astrauss@vcu.edu

Received: 03-Feb -2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-161296; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AADRSC-25-161296 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Feb-2025, QC No. AADRSC-25-161296; Revised:23-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-161296 (R); Published:28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aara-9.1.250

Citation: Strauss T. The psychological impact of cosmetic resurfacing: Boosting confidence and self-esteem. Dermatol Res Skin Care. 2025; 9(1):251

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

Abstract

  

Introduction

Cosmetic resurfacing procedures have gained popularity as a means to enhance physical appearance and address skin concerns. While primarily performed for aesthetic reasons, these treatments can have significant psychological effects, influencing self-esteem and confidence. This article explores the psychological impact of cosmetic resurfacing, discussing its benefits, potential risks, and the role of mental health professionals in ensuring positive outcomes. Evidence-based research highlights how improved appearance can lead to enhanced social interactions and mental well-being [1].

Cosmetic resurfacing includes various dermatological procedures aimed at improving skin texture, reducing scars, wrinkles, and hyperpigmentation. Popular treatments include laser resurfacing, chemical peels, and microdermabrasion. Beyond physical enhancement, these procedures can have profound psychological effects, influencing self-perception, self-esteem, and overall quality of life [2].

Studies indicate that individuals who undergo cosmetic procedures often report increased self-confidence and improved body image. Addressing visible skin concerns can reduce social anxiety and enhance social interactions [3].

Positive transformations in appearance can contribute to reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, some individuals may experience dissatisfaction due to unrealistic expectations or post-procedural complications [4].

Enhanced physical appearance is often associated with greater career opportunities and positive social interactions. Improved skin appearance can contribute to increased self-assurance in professional and personal settings [5].

Effective in treating acne scars, wrinkles, and pigmentation, leading to significant improvements in self-image. Potential side effects such as redness or scarring may cause temporary psychological distress. Can enhance skin texture and tone, leading to a renewed sense of self-confidence [6].

Emotional well-being may be affected during the healing phase. A non-invasive procedure with minimal downtime, often yielding high satisfaction rates. Repeated sessions may be required for optimal psychological benefits [7].

Individuals with BDD may undergo multiple procedures without satisfaction, requiring psychological evaluation before treatment. Temporary side effects such as swelling or discoloration may lead to heightened self-consciousness [8].

Educating patients about achievable results is crucial in preventing post-treatment dissatisfaction. Pre-procedure counseling can help assess motivation and mental well-being. Psychologists can support individuals struggling with post-procedure adaptation [9].

Collaboration between dermatologists and mental health professionals ensures holistic patient care. Cosmetic resurfacing can significantly boost self-esteem and confidence, leading to improved mental well-being and social interactions [10].

Conclusion

While many patients experience positive outcomes, addressing psychological risks and ensuring realistic expectations are essential for patient satisfaction. Integrating dermatological expertise with psychological support enhances the benefits of cosmetic procedures, contributing to overall well-being.

References

  1. Naylor MF, Boyd A, Smith DW, et al. High sun protection factor sunscreens in the suppression of actinic neoplasia. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(2):170-5.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Seo SJ, Fisher DE. Melanocyte photobiology, ultraviolet radiation and melanoma. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2010;145(5):603-11.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer (keratinocyte carcinomas) in the US population, 2012. J Am Med Assoc Dermatol. 2015;151(10):1081-6.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Stoebner PE, Poosti R, Djoukelfit K, et al. Decreased human epidermal antigen?presenting cell activity after ultraviolet A exposure: Dose–response effects and protection by sunscreens. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(6):1315-20.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Damian DL, Halliday GM, Taylor CA, et al. Ultraviolet radiation induced suppression of Mantoux reactions in humans. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;110(5):824-7.

    6. Google Scholar

  6. Gould JW, Mercurio MG, Elmets CA. Cutaneous photosensitivity diseases induced by exogenous agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(4):551-73.

    7. Google Scholar

  7. Hardin J, Mydlarski PR. Systemic retinoids: Chemoprevention of skin cancer in transplant recipients. Skin Therapy Lett. 2010;15(7):1-4.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  8. Acharya P, Mathur MC. Oxidative stress in alopecia areata: A systematic review and meta? Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(4):434-40.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Ulrich C, Jürgensen JS, Degen A, et al. Prevention of non?melanoma skin cancer in organ transplant patients by regular use of a sunscreen: A 24 months, prospective, case–control study. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(s3):78-84.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  10. Stern RS. Prevalence of a history of skin cancer in 2007: Results of an incidence-based model. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):279-82.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App