Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Research Article - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2023) Volume 7, Issue 4

The nutritional status and cognitive & motor development of children in Nepal

Jeeban Ghimire*

School of Economic Policy Studies, Nepal, India

Corresponding Author:
Jeeban Ghimire
School of Economic Policy Studies
Nepal, India.
E-mail:
zeeghimire@gmail.com

Received: 21-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-23-96817; Editor assigned: 27-Apr-2023, PreQC No. AAPHPP-23-96817 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-May-2023, QC No. AAPHPP-23-96817; Revised: 26- Jun-2023, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-23-96817 (R); Published: 05-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aaphpp- 7.4.183

Citation: Ghimire J. The nutritional status and cognitive & motor development of children in Nepal. J Public Health Policy Plan. 2023;7(4):183

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Background: Children are viewed as the best national asset. Nutrition influences physical growth, morbidity, mortality, cognitive development, reproduction and physical work ability, and it thus impacts human execution, health and survival. There is a direct effect of nutrition on the communication skill development, gross motor development, fine motor development, problem-solving skill and personal social development of children. Aim: To assess the nutritional status of 6-24 months children and investigate the association with the cognitive development of children.

Methods: The cross-sectional research design, the basically analytical design was adopted to depict the association across child feeding practices, nutritional status and cognitive and motor development of children. This study adopted mixed methods – quantitative and qualitative data in accordance with pragmatic philosophy and Health Belief Model. This study explored the Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) practices using WHO guidelines, child nutrition status (WHO Anthro) and cognitive and motor development by using Age and Stages Questionaire (ASQ). It covered the 347 sample households having 6-24 months of children.

Results: Acute malnutrition was found in 6.4% (4.3 - 9.5 95% C.I.) among the 6-24 months children whereas the problem of stunting was very high at 64.8 % (59.6 - 69.8 95% C.I.) and underweight was among the 26.8% children (22.1 - 31.4 95% C.I.). There was a significant correlation of nutritional status with 16 and above month children in gross motor development, fine motor development and problem-solving skill development (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.011, p=0.047 & p=0.047). Mother’s education was found one important factor which had a significant effect on the practices of dietary diversity.

Keywords

Children, Nutrition, Growth, Cognitive, Motor development.

Background

Children are viewed as the best national asset. Nutrition influences physical growth, morbidity, mortality, cognitive development, reproduction and physical work ability, and it thus impacts human execution, health and survival. There is a direct effect of nutrition on the communication skill development, gross motor development, fine motor development, problem-solving skill and personal social development of children.

Aim

To assess the nutritional status of 6-24 months children and investigate the association with the cognitive development of children.

Methods

The cross-sectional research design, the basically analytical design was adopted to depict the association across child feeding practices, nutritional status and cognitive and motor development of children. This study adopted mixed methods – quantitative and qualitative data in accordance with pragmatic philosophy and Health Belief Model. This study explored the Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) practices using WHO guidelines, child nutrition status (WHO Anthro) and cognitive and motor development by using Age and Stages Questionaire (ASQ). It covered the 347 sample households having 6-24 months of children.

Results

Acute malnutrition was found in 6.4% (4.3 - 9.5 95% C.I.) among the 6-24 months children whereas the problem of stunting was very high at 64.8 % (59.6 - 69.8 95% C.I.) and underweight was among the 26.8% children (22.1 - 31.4 95% C.I.).

There was a significant correlation of nutritional status with 16 and above month children in gross motor development, fine motor development and problem-solving skill development (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.011, p=0.047 & p=0.047).

Nutrition status and communication development of children

There is significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.24) with age group of 6 months between underweight and communication skill development (Table 1) [1].

  Age of Children in Months
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Underweight
Pearson Correlation .458* .012 .247 .058 .219 .052 .174 .291 .123 .295
Sig. (2-tailed) .024 .939 .159 .750 .273 .724 .318 .058 .511 .172

Stunting
Pearson Correlation .398 .135 .322 -.244 -.009 .206 -.188 .154 .315 .336
Sig. (2-tailed) .054 .393 .063 .172 .966 .161 .279 .324 .085 .117

Wasting
Pearson Correlation -.107 -.162 -.052 .269 .276 -.127 .272 .247 -.270 -.021
Sig. (2-tailed) .620 .306 .772 .130 .164 .388 .120 .111 .141 .926

Table 1. Nutrition status and communication development of children

Nutrition status and gross motor development of children

There is strong significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.000) only with age group of 20 months between underweight and gross motor skill development. Similarly, there is significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.011, p=0.047 & p=0.047) only with age groups of 16 months, 22 months and 24 months respectively between stunting and gross motor skill development. Likewise, there is strong significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.000) only with age group of 20 months between wasting and gross motor skill development (Table 2) [2, 3].

  Age of Children in Months
  6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Underweight
Pearson Correlation .160 .075 .309 .305 .214 .266 -.145 .561** .143 .143
Sig. (2-tailed) .455 .639 .075 .084 .285 .068 .405 .000 .303 .303

Stunting
Pearson Correlation .354 .207 .330 .318 .103 .364* -.183 .162 .272* .272*
Sig. (2-tailed) .089 .187 .057 .072 .608 .011 .293 .298 .047 .047

Wasting
Pearson Correlation -.271 -.149 -.043 .024 .166 -.022 .057 .523** -.147 -.147
Sig. (2-tailed) .200 .346 .809 .896 .407 .884 .750 .000 .288 .288

Table 2. Nutrition status and gross motor development of children

Nutrition status and fine motor development of children

There is significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.009 & p=0.010) only with age groups of 16 months and 20 months between underweight and fine motor skill development. Similarly, there is strong significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.005) only with age group of 16 months between stunting and fine motor skill development (Table 3) [4-7].

  Age of Children in Months
  6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Underweight
Pearson Correlation .028 -.103 .206 .127 .120 .372** -.019 .388* .304 .388
Sig. (2-tailed) .898 .516 .242 .482 .550 .009 .915 .010 .097 .067

Stunting
Pearson Correlation .161 .064 .188 .253 -.018 .395** -.222 .287 .322 .335
Sig. (2-tailed) .463 .689 .287 .155 .928 .005 .206 .062 .077 .118

Wasting
Pearson Correlation -.141 -.265 .065 -.123 .161 .094 .220 .214 .010 .085
Sig. (2-tailed) .521 .090 .716 .494 .424 .523 .218 .168 .959 .699

Table 3.Nutrition status and fine motor development of children

Nutrition status and problem solving development of children

There is significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.019) only with age groups of 20 months between underweight and problem solving skill development. Similarly, there is significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.000 & p=0.040) only with age groups of 16 months and 24 months respectively between stunting and problem solving skill development. Likewise, there is strong significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.007) only with age group of 20 months between wasting and problem solving skill development (Table 4) [8-12].

  Age of Children in Months
  6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Underweight
Pearson Correlation .162 .098 .255 .224 .051 .279 .043 .356* .347 .355
Sig. (2-tailed) .449 .535 .146 .209 .799 .055 .808 .019 .056 .096

Stunting
Pearson Correlation .376 .255 .278 .217 -.016 .546** -.113 .055 .286 .432*
Sig. (2-tailed) .070 .103 .111 .225 .936 .000 .517 .726 .119 .040

Wasting
Pearson Correlation -.318 -.149 -.011 .021 .078 -.135 .211 .407** .148 -.075
Sig. (2-tailed) .130 .346 .951 .909 .699 .359 .231 .007 .428 .734

Table 4. Nutrition status and problem solving development of children

Nutrition status and personal social development of children

There is correlation (p<0.05) with age groups of 6 months, 10 months, 16 months and 24 months between stunting personal social skill development. Likewise, there is strong significant correlation (p<0.05, i.e. p=0.007) only with age group of 6 months between wasting and personal social skill development (Table 5) [13-18].

  Age of Children in Months
  6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Underweight
Pearson Correlation .020 .248 .284 .221 -.031 .178 -.038 .191 -.022 .052
Sig. (2-tailed) .925 .113 .104 .216 .877 .226 .827 .219 .905 .812

Stunting
Pearson Correlation .519** .240 .356* .044 -.033 .437** -.166 .085 .160 .452*
Sig. (2-tailed) .009 .126 .039 .810 .870 .002 .341 .587 .389 .030

Wasting
Pearson Correlation -.536** .056 -.040 .175 .005 -.169 .095 .185 -.235 -.383
Sig. (2-tailed) .007 .726 .821 .329 .979 .252 .593 .234 .204 .071

Table 5. Nutrition status and personal social development of children

Conclusion

The cognitive and motor development skill was found better among the children. The study found the better status of communication skill development (cut off point 20.7 where mean value 43.6), gross motor development (cut off point 31.1 where mean value 46.1), fine motor development (cut off point 32.79 where mean value 44.09), problem solving skill (cut off point 28 where mean value 42.27), and personal social development (cut off point 28 where mean value 47.66). The average mean value was higher than the cutoff point of each types of development.

There was significant correlation of nutritional status with 16 and above month children in gross motor development, fine motor development and problem solving skill development whereas there was relationship of nutritional status with 6 to 24 months’ children in personal social development. But there was no relationship found between the nutritional status and communication skill development of children, except with 6 months’ children.

From the perspective of parents’ experience in overall development of their children, the overall development of 6-24 months’ children was found satisfactory level. Physical growth and development, and cognitive development was asked with the parents when majority of parents shared the well development in movement, body language, walking, hearing, vision and health problem in child.

Recommendation

The further researcher may be done similar study in other most under privileged communities which may give the new knowledge to design and intervene nutrition programme in communities.

The study found that higher prevalence of malnutrition, so an in-depth longitudinal study on pregnant women and children to identify causative factors of malnutrition among children.

An action research on behaviour modification of care takers to improve the health and nutritional status of below 2 years children and early intervention may be conducted to study its impact on developmental profile of the children.

References

  1. Alligood M R, T. A. Nursing Theories: a companion to nursing theories and models. New Jersey. 2011.
  2. Powell B, Bezner Kerr R, Young SL, et al. The determinants of dietary diversity and nutrition: ethnonutrition knowledge of local people in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13(1):1-2.
  3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Ong F. California Infant/Toddler Learning & Development Foundations California Infant/Toddler Learning & Development Foundations. 2018.
  5. Google Scholar

  6. Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun. 2010;25(8):661-9.
  7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017.
  9. Google Scholar

  10. Acharya D, Gautam S, Kaphle HP, et al. Factors associated with nutritional status of under five children in Rupandehi District of Nepal. J Health Allied Sci. 2013;3(1):56-9.
  11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  12. Ed.D., S. A., Church, E. B., & Poole, C. (2018-2019). Ages & Stages: How Children Develop Motor Skills. Early Childhood Today, 1-3.
  13. Eeuwijk, P. V. The preparation of food and drink is regarded as pivotal to care of chronically sick elderly people in urban Indonesia. Their meals are cooked solely by close household members. The majority of the elderly sick take part in the joint daily meals that serv. North Sulawesi, Indonesia: Food Chains. 2007.
  14. Ghimire MN. Health status of children of Chepang and other communities of Nepal. J Adv Res. 2014;1(1):24-8.
  15. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  16. Holydiver. (2012, Nov 11). Theory of Nutrition. Spiral Journey. Retrieved August 15, 2018, from http://blog.dlahn.com/theory-of-nutrition/
  17. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  18. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984 Mar;11(1):1-47.
  19. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  20. Ministries N. Recipe for a Healthier Diet. Norwegian Action Plan on Nutrition (2007–2011).
  21. Google Scholar

  22. Ocampo-Guirindola ML, Garcia-Malabad CJ, Valdeabella-Maniego ML, et al. Association between dietary diversity score and nutritional status of Filipino children aged 6-23 months. Philipp J Sci. 2016;145(1):57-69.
  23. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  24. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974 Dec;2(4):328-35.
  25. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  26. Shrestha, S. L. Statistical Methods: For Environment, Biological and Health Sciences. Kathmandu, Nepal. 2010.
  27. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  28. Siddiqui TR, Ghazal S, Bibi S, et al. Use of the health belief model for the assessment of public knowledge and household preventive practices in Karachi, Pakistan, a dengue-endemic city. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(11):e0005129.
  29. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  30. Siegler, R. Cognitive Development in Childhood. NOBA, 2013;1-2.
  31. UNDP. Policy in Focus. UK, Routledge: A publication of The International Policy Center for Inclusive Growth. 2016.
Get the App