Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Perspective - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

The Molecular Signaling Pathways of T-Cell Activation

Qian Shi *

Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China

*Corresponding Author:
Qian Shi
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China
E-mail: q.shi@polyu.edu.hk

Received: 03-Feb -2025, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-25-161376; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AAJCIT-25-161376 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Feb-2025, QC No. AAJCIT-25-161376; Revised:23-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-25-161376 (R); Published:28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aajcit-8.1.250

Citation: Shi Q. The molecular signaling pathways of t-cell activation. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2025;8(1):250

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Abstract

  

Introduction

T-cells play a crucial role in adaptive immunity by recognizing and responding to specific antigens. Their activation is a tightly regulated process involving multiple molecular signaling pathways that ensure appropriate immune responses. The activation of T-cells is primarily initiated by the engagement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) with an antigen-presenting cell (APC), leading to a cascade of intracellular signaling events. This article explores the key molecular pathways involved in T-cell activation and their significance in immune regulation [1].

The T-cell receptor (TCR) complex, which includes the CD3 signaling subunits, is responsible for recognizing antigenic peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on APCs. Upon antigen recognition, a series of phosphorylation events is triggered, initiating downstream signaling pathways essential for T-cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation [2].

The activation process begins with the phosphorylation of the CD3 intracellular domains by Src family kinases, primarily Lck and Fyn. These kinases phosphorylate immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) on the CD3 complex, creating docking sites for ZAP-70 (zeta-associated protein of 70 kDa). ZAP-70 is then activated and phosphorylates the linker for activation of T-cells (LAT), a key scaffolding protein that facilitates the assembly of the LAT signalosome [3].

Once LAT is phosphorylated, it recruits Grb2 and SOS, leading to the activation of the small GTPase Ras. Ras subsequently activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, involving Raf, MEK, and ERK. The MAPK pathway culminates in the activation of transcription factors such as AP-1, which are critical for gene expression involved in T-cell proliferation and differentiation [4].

LAT also recruits PLC-γ1, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to generate inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 induces calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum, activating the calcineurin-NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells) pathway. DAG, on the other hand, activates protein kinase C (PKC), which further contributes to the activation of transcription factors such as NF-κB [5].

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) is another critical signaling molecule activated downstream of TCR engagement. Akt promotes cell survival and metabolism by inhibiting pro-apoptotic factors and enhancing glucose uptake, thereby supporting T-cell expansion and function [6].

NF-κB is a transcription factor that plays a pivotal role in immune responses, including T-cell activation. It is activated through two main pathways: the classical and the non-classical pathway. In the classical pathway, PKCθ activates the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 complex, leading to the phosphorylation and degradation of IκB, an inhibitor of NF-κB. This allows NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus and regulate genes associated with immune responses [7].

In addition to TCR signaling, co-stimulatory and inhibitory signals fine-tune T-cell activation. The CD28 receptor, when engaged by B7 molecules on APCs, enhances TCR signaling by activating PI3K and promoting cytokine production. Conversely, inhibitory receptors such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 serve as immune checkpoints that dampen excessive immune responses and maintain immune homeostasis [8].

Understanding the molecular signaling pathways of T-cell activation has significant therapeutic implications. Targeting checkpoint inhibitors like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 has revolutionized cancer immunotherapy by enhancing T-cell responses against tumors. Additionally, modulating key signaling molecules such as PI3K and NF-κB is being explored in autoimmune diseases to prevent aberrant T-cell activation [9].

PI3K phosphorylates PIP2 to produce phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), which recruits and activates Akt. T-cell activation is a complex and highly regulated process involving multiple interconnected signaling pathways [10].

Conclusion

The TCR-mediated signal transduction cascades, including the Src kinases, Ras-MAPK, PLC-γ, PI3K-Akt, and NF-κB pathways, collectively determine T-cell fate and function. Understanding these molecular mechanisms provides insights into immune regulation and paves the way for novel therapeutic interventions in immunological disorders.

References

  1. Kretz AL, Trauzold A, Hillenbrand A, et al., TRAILblazing strategies for cancer treatment. 2019;11(4):456.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. L Arias J. Drug targeting strategies in cancer treatment: an overview. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2011;11(1):1-7.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Teleanu RI, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, et al., Tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic strategies for cancer treatment. J Clin Med. 2019;9(1):84.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Lee Y, Auh SL, Wang Y, et al., Therapeutic effects of ablative radiation on local tumor require CD8+ T cells: changing strategies for cancer treatment. Am J 2009;114(3):589-95.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Slaney CY, Wang P, Darcy PK, et al., CARs versus BiTEs: a comparison between T cell–redirection strategies for cancer treatment. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(8):924-34.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Jiang J, Guo W, Liang X. Phenotypes, accumulation, and functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and associated treatment strategies in cancer patients. Hum Immunol. 2014;75(11):1128-37.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Sethi S, Li Y, H Sarkar F. Regulating miRNA by natural agents as a new strategy for cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets. 2013;14(10):1167-74.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Wolinsky JB, Colson YL, Grinstaff MW. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers. J Control Release. 2012;159(1):14-26.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Teiten MH, Dicato M, Diederich M. Hybrid curcumin compounds: a new strategy for cancer treatment. Mol. 2014;19(12):20839-63.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Wu WK, Cho CH, Lee CW, et al., Proteasome inhibition: a new therapeutic strategy to cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2010;293(1):15-22.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App