Mini Review - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2024) Volume 8, Issue 3
The Influence of Social Determinants on Health Outcomes: Developing a Comprehensive Evaluation Framework
Elizabeth Elfar *
School of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
- *Corresponding Author:
- Elizabeth Elfar
School of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia
E-mail: elizaelfr@uq.edu.au
Received: 29-April-2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-142503; Editor assigned: 01- May -2024, PreQC No AAPHPP-24-142503 (PQ); Reviewed:15- May-2024, QC No. AAPHPP-24-142503; Revised:20- May -2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-142503 (R); Published:27- May -2024, DOI:10.35841/ aaphpp-8.3.239
Citation: Elfar E: The influence of social determinants on health outcomes: developing a comprehensive evaluation framework. J Public Health Policy Plan .2024;8(3):239
Abstract
Introduction
Health outcomes are influenced by a complex interplay of biological, behavioral, and social factors. While traditional health models have focused on biological and clinical factors, there is growing recognition of the significant role played by social determinants. Social determinants are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age, and they encompass a wide range of factors including income, education, employment, social support, and community safety [1].
To effectively evaluate the influence of social determinants on health outcomes, a comprehensive framework is required. This framework should include the following key Collecting numerical data through surveys, national statistics, and health records. Examples include income levels, educational attainment, and rates of healthcare utilization.Gathering detailed information through interviews, focus groups, and case studies to understand personal experiences and perceptions of social determinants.Health outcomes should be analyzed in relation to the identified social determinants [2].
This involves,Using methods such as regression analysis to examine the relationship between social determinants and health outcomes.Comparing health outcomes across different demographic and socioeconomic groups to identify disparities.Studying how changes in The journey of health outcome metrics begins with conceptualization. At its core, this involves defining what constitutes a meaningful health outcome. Traditionally, outcomes were often measured in terms of mortality rates or the presence of specific diseases. However, contemporary approaches embrace a more nuanced perspective, incorporating various dimensions of health such as quality of life, functional status, and patient satisfaction [3].
clinicians may focus on clinical outcomes like symptom control, patients might prioritize quality of life and functional independence. The chosen metrics should accurately reflect the intended health outcomes and produce consistent results across different populations and settings. This requires rigorous testing and validation.Metrics should encompass a range of health aspects, including physical, mental, and social well-being, to provide a holistic view of patient health [4].
Healthcare settings vary widely in terms of resources, patient populations, and care processes. Metrics need to be adaptable to these variations to ensure they provide meaningful insights across diverse environments.Implementing metrics is not a one-time task but an ongoing process. Regular feedback from users and stakeholders is essential for refining metrics and addressing any challenges or gaps identified during implementation [5].
The VHA has developed and utilized a comprehensive set of outcome metrics to monitor and improve the quality of care for veterans. Their approach emphasizes continuous feedback and adaptation to meet evolving needs.WHO’s Global Health Observatory provides a platform for tracking a wide range of health outcome metrics across countries. This global perspective helps identify trends, disparities, and areas for improvement in health systems worldwide [6].
To effectively evaluate the influence of social determinants on health outcomes, a comprehensive framework is required. This framework should include the following key Collecting numerical data through surveys, national statistics, and health records. Examples include income levels, educational attainment, and rates of healthcare utilization.Gathering detailed information through interviews, focus groups, and case studies to understand personal experiences and perceptions of social determinants.Health outcomes should be analyzed in relation to the identified social determinants [7].
Health outcomes are influenced by a complex interplay of biological, behavioral, and social factors. While traditional health models have focused on biological and clinical factors, there is growing recognition of the significant role played by social determinants. Social determinants are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age, and they encompass a wide range of factors including income, education, employment, social support, and community safety [8].
This involves,Using methods such as regression analysis to examine the relationship between social determinants and health outcomes.Comparing health outcomes across different demographic and socioeconomic groups to identify disparities.Studying how changes in The journey of health outcome metrics begins with conceptualization [9].
At its core, this involves defining what constitutes a meaningful health outcome. Traditionally, outcomes were often measured in terms of mortality rates or the presence of specific diseases. However, contemporary approaches embrace a more nuanced perspective, incorporating various dimensions of health such as quality of life, functional status, and patient satisfaction [10].
conclusion
Evaluating the influence of social determinants on health outcomes requires a comprehensive and nuanced framework. By systematically identifying, measuring, and analyzing social determinants, and by considering contextual factors, researchers and policymakers can develop more effective strategies to address health disparities and improve overall health outcomes. This approach not only enhances our understanding of how social factors impact health but also guides the development of targeted interventions and policies that promote equity and well-being for all
References
- Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1149-55.
- Levy H, Meltzer D. The impact of health insurance on health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:399-409.
- Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, et al. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239-44.
- Emanuel L, Berwick D, Conway J, et al. What exactly is patient safety?J Med Regul. 2009;95(1):13-24.
- Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Marsteller JA, et al. Framework for patient safety research and improvement. Circ. 2009;119(2):330-7.
- Bates DW, Larizgoitia I, Prasopa Plaizier N, et al. Global priorities for patient safety research. Bmj. 2009;338.
- Weaver SJ, Lubomksi LH, Wilson RF, et al. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(2):369-74.
- Sammer CE, Lykens K, Singh KP, et al. What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Sch. 2010;42(2):156-65.
- World Health Organization (WHO). HIV Key facts. 2023.
- International Films, Mapping the media. HIV/AIDS: Media Manual India; 2005.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref