Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 2

The immunological revolution to recognize how cancer vaccines are changing for cure.

Xuemin Murphy *

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Xuemin Murphy
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, USA
E-mail: xuemin.m@nd.edu

Received: 02-Apr -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-132925; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-132925 (PQ); Reviewed:17-Apr-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-132925; Revised:22-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-132925(R); Published:29-Apr-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.2.205

Citation: Murphy X., The immunological revolution to recognize how cancer vaccines are changing for cure. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(2):205

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

In the past decade, cancer treatment has witnessed a paradigm shift with the advent of cancer vaccines. Unlike traditional vaccines that prevent infectious diseases, cancer vaccines harness the power of the immune system to target and destroy cancer cells. This immunological revolution represents a groundbreaking approach to cancer therapy, offering new hope to patients and changing the landscape of oncology. In this article, we explore the principles of cancer vaccines, recent advancements, and their potential to transform the way we combat cancer [1].

Cancer vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. They accomplish this by presenting tumor-specific antigens to immune cells, such as T cells, thereby priming them to recognize and destroy cancerous cells. These antigens can be derived from tumor proteins, peptides, or even whole tumor cells. By targeting antigens unique to cancer cells, cancer vaccines aim to induce a targeted immune response while sparing healthy tissues [2].

Recent advancements in cancer vaccine research have expanded the repertoire of vaccine strategies and improved their efficacy. Peptide vaccines, which consist of short amino acid sequences derived from tumor antigens, have shown promise in eliciting immune responses against cancer cells [3].

Cancer vaccines can be broadly categorized into two types: preventive vaccines and therapeutic vaccines. Preventive vaccines target cancer-causing viruses, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV), to prevent the development of virus-associated cancers. Therapeutic vaccines, on the other hand, aim to treat existing cancer by stimulating the immune system to recognize and attack tumor cells. These vaccines often target tumor-associated antigens or neoantigens—mutations unique to cancer cells [4].

Additionally, dendritic cell vaccines, which harness the antigen-presenting capabilities of dendritic cells to prime T cell responses, have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials. Moreover, the emergence of nucleic acid-based vaccines, such as mRNA and DNA vaccines, offers new avenues for delivering tumor antigens and activating immune responses [5].

While cancer vaccines hold great promise, challenges remain to be addressed. Not all patients respond to treatment, and immune-related adverse events can occur due to overactivation of the immune system. Additionally, identifying suitable tumor antigens and optimizing vaccine formulations to enhance immunogenicity and durability of responses are ongoing areas of research. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of cancer poses challenges in developing vaccines that can effectively target diverse tumor cell populations [6].

To overcome these challenges, researchers are exploring combination strategies that synergize with cancer vaccines to enhance anti-tumor immune responses. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash the immune system's brakes, have been combined with cancer vaccines to potentiate immune activation and improve clinical outcomes [7].

Additionally, other immunomodulatory agents, such as toll-like receptor agonists and cytokines, are being investigated for their potential to augment vaccine-induced immune responses and overcome immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment [8].

Despite the obstacles, there is reason for optimism in the field of cancer vaccines. Advances in technology, such as high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics, enable the identification of neoantigens and the rational design of personalized vaccines tailored to individual patients' tumor profiles [9].

Moreover, innovative vaccine delivery systems and adjuvants hold promise for enhancing vaccine efficacy and promoting long-lasting immune memory. As research continues to unravel the complexities of tumor immunology, the potential for cancer vaccines to become a mainstay of cancer therapy grows ever brighter [10].

conclusion

The advent of cancer vaccines represents a transformative milestone in cancer treatment, ushering in an era of immunological revolution. With continued research, collaboration, and innovation, cancer vaccines hold the promise of offering new hope to patients battling this formidable disease, bringing us closer to the goal of effective cancer prevention and treatment.

References

  1. A Baudino T. Targeted cancer therapy: the next generation of cancer treatment. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2015;12(1):3-20.

    2. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

  2. Puro RJ, Bouchlaka MN, Hiebsch RR, et al., Development of AO-176, a next-generation humanized anti-CD47 antibody with novel anticancer properties and negligible red blood cell binding. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(3):835-46.

    3. Goggle Scholar

  3. Guo J, Bourre L, Soden DM, et al., Can non-viral technologies knockdown the barriers to siRNA delivery and achieve the next generation of cancer therapeutics?. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(4):402-17.

    4. Goggle Scholar

  4. Mosele F, Remon J, Mateo J, et al., Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol.2020;31(11):1491-505.

    5. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar

  5. Oxnard GR, Paweletz CP, Kuang Y, et al., Noninvasive detection of response and resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer using quantitative next-generation genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(6):1698-705.

    6. Goggle Scholar

  6. Zill OA, Greene C, Sebisanovic D, et al., Cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing in pancreatobiliary carcinomas. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(10):1040-8.

    7. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

  7. Loyo M, Li RJ, Bettegowda C, et al., Lessons learned from next?generation sequencing in head and neck cancer. Head 2013;35(3):454-63.

    8. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

  8. Miller FA, Hayeems RZ, Bytautas JP, et al., Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(3):391-5.

    9. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

  9. Nagahashi M, Shimada Y, Ichikawa H, et al., Next generation sequencing?based gene panel tests for the management of solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(1):6-15.

    10. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

  10. Setton J, Zinda M, Riaz N, et al., Synthetic lethality in cancer therapeutics: the next generation. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(7):1626-35.

    11. Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref

Get the App