Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Mini Review - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 4

The Future of Cancer Treatment: Advances and Benefits of Radiation Therapy

Jongseo Lee *

Sungkyunkwan University, Department of Electrical and computer Engineering, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author:
Jongseo Lee
Department of Electrical and computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
E-mail: jslee@skku.edu

Received: 01-Aug -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144161; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-144161 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Aug-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-144161; Revised:21-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144161 (R); Published:30-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.4.220

Citation: Lee J., The future of cancer treatment: Advances and benefits of radiation therapy. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(4):220

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

Radiation therapy has long been a cornerstone in the treatment of cancer, offering a potent means to target and eliminate malignant cells. As technology and research advance, the field of radiation therapy is evolving rapidly, with new techniques and innovations enhancing its effectiveness and minimizing side effects. This article explores the latest advancements in radiation therapy, highlighting the benefits they bring to cancer treatment and patient care [1].

Radiation therapy uses high-energy radiation to destroy cancer cells by damaging their DNA, ultimately leading to cell death. It can be used alone or in combination with other treatments like surgery and chemotherapy. The therapy is typically delivered via external beam radiation or internal sources such as brachytherapy [2].

Recent advancements in radiation therapy technology have significantly improved precision and outcomes: IMRT allows for the precise delivery of radiation doses by modulating the intensity of the radiation beams. This technique minimizes damage to surrounding healthy tissues and organs. IMRT has become particularly effective in treating cancers of the head and neck, prostate, and breast [3].

IGRT involves the use of advanced imaging techniques, such as CT scans and MRI, to guide radiation delivery with high accuracy. This approach ensures that radiation is precisely targeted at the tumor, even if there are shifts in the tumor’s position between treatment sessions [4].

SBRT delivers very high doses of radiation to small, well-defined tumors over a few sessions. It is especially useful for treating early-stage lung cancer and metastases. Studies have shown SBRT to be highly effective in achieving high tumor control rates with minimal side effects [5].

Unlike traditional X-ray radiation, proton therapy uses protons to treat cancer. This technique allows for precise targeting of tumors with reduced radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues, making it ideal for treating pediatric cancers and tumors near critical organs [6].

The advancements in radiation therapy offer numerous benefits, improving the efficacy and safety of cancer treatment: Modern techniques like IMRT and IGRT enhance the precision of radiation delivery, reducing the risk of damage to healthy tissues and organs. This precision not only improves tumor control but also minimizes side effects, leading to better overall patient outcomes [7].

Technologies such as SBRT allow for higher doses of radiation to be delivered in fewer sessions, reducing the overall treatment time. This can lead to increased patient convenience and adherence to the treatment regimen. By minimizing damage to healthy tissues and reducing side effects, advanced radiation therapies contribute to a better quality of life for patients. This includes fewer long-term complications and a quicker recovery process [8].

Proton therapy and other advanced techniques provide options for treating complex or challenging cases where traditional radiation might be less effective. For instance, proton therapy is particularly beneficial for treating cancers in children, where minimizing radiation exposure to developing tissues is crucial [9].

Despite the benefits, there are challenges and considerations associated with advanced radiation therapies: Advanced radiation technologies, such as proton therapy, are often costly and may not be widely available. This can create disparities in access to cutting-edge treatments, particularly in underserved regions [10].

Conclusion

The advancements in radiation therapy are revolutionizing cancer treatment, offering enhanced precision, reduced treatment durations, and improved patient outcomes. While challenges such as cost and accessibility remain, ongoing research and technological developments continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in cancer care. By embracing these innovations, the future of radiation therapy promises to deliver even greater benefits and contribute to more effective and personalized cancer treatments.

References

  1. Sheu T, Briere TM, Olanrewaju AM, McAleer MF. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Arc Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Glioblastoma—Does Clinical Benefit Follow Dosimetric Advantage?. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4(1):50-6.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Rosen L. Possibilities and advantages of using negative pions in radiotherapy. Nucl Appl. 1968;5(6):379-88.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Attalla EM, ELSAyed AA, ElGantiry M, ElTahher Z. Advantages of three-dimensional treatment planning in radiation therapy. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl. 2003 Sep 1;36.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Gomez–Millan Barrachina J, Jerez Sainz I, Perez Rozos A, Ramirez Ros JC, Toledo Serrano MD, Lupiañez Perez Y, Medina Carmona JA. Potential advantages of volumetric arc therapy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2015;37(6):909-14.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS, Mc Black PL, Canellos GP. Meta?analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer. 1993;71(8):2585-97.

    6. Google Scholar

  6. Qiu S, Lu J, Zheng W, Xu L, Lin S, Huang C, Xu Y, Huang L, Pan J. Advantages of intensity modulated radiotherapy in recurrent T1-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study. Bmc Cancer. 2014;14:1-8.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Wong JY, Liu A, Schultheiss T, Popplewell L, Stein A, Rosenthal J, Essensten M, Forman S, Somlo G. Targeted total marrow irradiation using three-dimensional image-guided tomographic intensity-modulated radiation therapy: an alternative to standard total body irradiation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(3):306-15.

    8. Google Scholar

  8. Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, Rossi CJ, Miller DW, Adams JA, Shipley WU. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2005;294(10):1233-9.

    9. Google Scholar

  9. Lan J, Li R, Yin LM, Deng L, Gui J, Chen BQ, Zhou L, Meng MB, Huang QR, Mo XM, Wei YQ. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells and programmed death ligand 1 confers therapeutic advantage of ablative hypofractionated radiation therapy compared with conventional fractionated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101(1):74-87.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Xing L, Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, Li TF, Kim GY, Luxton G, Koong A. Overview of image-guided radiation therapy. Med Dosimet. 2006;31(2):91-112.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App