Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health (2023) Volume 7, Issue 6

The economics of oral health: Costs, benefits, and policy implications.

David Julian *

Department of Oral Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Dental College, Arhus University, Arhus, Denmark

*Corresponding Author:
David Julian
Department of Oral Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Dental College, Arhus University, Arhus, Denmark
E-mail: davidjulian@foxmail.com

Received:06-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. AACDOH-23-135286; Editor assigned: 07-Nov-2023, PreQC No. AACDOH-23-135286 (PQ); Reviewed:12-Nov-2023, QC No. AACDOH-23-135286; Revised:17-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. AACDOH-23-135286(R); Published:21-Nov-2023, DOI:10.35841/aacdoh-7.6.178

Citation: Julian D. The economics of oral health: Costs, benefits, and policy implications. J Clin Dentistry Oral Health. 2023;7(6):178

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health

Introduction

Oral health, often overshadowed in discussions of overall health, is a critical aspect of well-being with significant economic implications. This paper examines the economics of oral health by exploring its costs, benefits, and policy implications.

Firstly, the costs of poor oral health are substantial. Dental diseases, including tooth decay, gum disease, and oral cancer, impose considerable financial burdens on individuals, healthcare systems, and economies at large. Direct costs include expenses related to dental treatments, medications, and surgeries, while indirect costs encompass productivity losses due to absenteeism and reduced efficiency at work. Moreover, disparities in oral health exacerbate existing social inequalities, with marginalized communities often facing greater barriers to accessing dental care [1-5].

Conversely, investing in oral health yields substantial benefits. Improved oral health not only enhances individuals' quality of life but also generates economic returns through various channels. For instance, preventive measures such as community water fluoridation and school-based dental programs reduce the incidence of dental diseases, thereby lowering treatment costs and enhancing productivity. Furthermore, good oral health is linked to better overall health outcomes, reducing the burden on healthcare systems and fostering economic development by promoting workforce participation and productivity [6-10].

Effective policy interventions are crucial for addressing oral health disparities and maximizing its economic benefits. Policy approaches should focus on both prevention and treatment strategies, emphasizing early interventions to mitigate the progression of dental diseases. Additionally, policies promoting oral health literacy and education can empower individuals to adopt healthier behaviors and make informed decisions about their oral care. Furthermore, expanding access to affordable dental services, particularly for underserved populations, is essential for reducing disparities and promoting equity in oral health outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, oral health has significant economic implications, with costs stemming from dental diseases and benefits arising from preventive and treatment interventions. Policy efforts should prioritize addressing oral health disparities and promoting preventive measures to maximize the economic returns of investing in oral health.

References

  1. Barrie HJ. The architecture of caseous nodules in the lung and the place of the word “acinar” in describing tuberculous lesions. Can Med Assoc J. 1965;92(22):1149.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

  1. Feldman WH, Baggenstoss AH. The residual infectivity of the primary complex of tuberculosis. Am J Pathol. 1938;14(4):473.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

  1. Dock W. Reasons for the common anatomic location of pulmonary tuberculosis. Radiol. 1947;48(4):319-22.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Wayne LG. Dynamics of submerged growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions. Am J Respir. 1976;114(4):807-11.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Vargas MH, Furuya ME, Pérez-Guzmán C. Effect of altitude on the frequency of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(11):1321-4..

Indexed at, Google Scholar

  1. Lefrak, MD SS, Yusen, et al. Recent advances in surgery for emphysema. Annu Rev Med. 1997;48(1):387-98.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Ramsey SD, Berry K, Etzioni R, et al. Cost effectiveness of lung-volume-reduction surgery for patients with severe emphysema. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(21): 2092- 2102.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Patients at high risk of death after lung-volume–reduction surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(15):1075-83.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Tassi GF, Davies RJ, Noppen M. Advanced techniques in medical thoracoscopy. Eur Clin Respir. 2006;28(5):1051-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Kemp SV, Slebos DJ, Kirk A, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of Zephyr endobronchial valve treatment in heterogeneous emphysema (TRANSFORM). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1535-43.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App