Addiction & Criminology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Commentary - Addiction & Criminology (2023) Volume 6, Issue 4

The criminalization of poverty: A critical examination.

Amaya Duncan*

Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, United States of America

*Corresponding Author:
Amaya Duncan
Department of Biostatistics
University of Kentucky
United States of America
E-mail: a.duncan@uky.edu

Received: 01-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108666; Editor assigned: 02-August-2023, PreQC No. AARA-23-108666 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-August-2023, QC No. AARA-23- 108666; Revised: 21-August-2023, Manuscript No. AARA-23-108666(R); Published: 28-August-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aara-6.4.159

Citation: Duncan A. The criminalization of poverty: A critical examination. Addict Criminol. 2023;6(4):159

Visit for more related articles at Addiction & Criminology

Introduction

In many societies, poverty and crime are often intertwined, with individuals experiencing poverty more likely to be involved in criminal activities. However, a concerning phenomenon has emerged: the criminalization of poverty. This refers to the practice of targeting and punishing individuals living in poverty for behaviors associated with their socioeconomic circumstances. This article critically examines the criminalization of poverty, highlighting its consequences, ethical concerns, and the need for alternative approaches to address poverty-related issues [1].

Poverty often creates a cycle that is difficult to break free from. Individuals living in poverty face limited access to education, healthcare, housing, and employment opportunities. These systemic disadvantages contribute to increased involvement in activities such as petty theft, drug offenses, and survivalrelated crimes. Instead of addressing the root causes of poverty, the criminal justice system often focuses on punitive measures that perpetuate the cycle. One of the key issues in the criminalization of poverty is the punishment of survival behaviors. Homelessness, panhandling, loitering, and public urination are examples of activities that are disproportionately targeted and criminalized among individuals experiencing poverty. Rather than providing support and resources, individuals are subjected to fines, incarceration, and a criminal record, further hindering their chances of escaping poverty [2].

The criminalization of poverty raises significant ethical concerns. It perpetuates a system that punishes individuals for their economic circumstances, punishing poverty itself rather than addressing the systemic inequalities that give rise to it. It violates the principles of fairness and justice by disproportionately targeting marginalized communities and exacerbating the social and economic disparities they face. Criminalizing poverty has a profound impact on communities and families. Parents arrested for survival-related crimes can face separation from their children, leading to long-lasting emotional, psychological, and developmental consequences. Families are torn apart, and the social fabric of communities is further weakened. This approach undermines social cohesion and contributes to cycles of poverty and crime that perpetuate across generations [3].

Instead of criminalizing poverty, there is a growing recognition of the need for alternative approaches that address its underlying causes. Investing in education, job training, and affordable housing can empower individuals to escape poverty and reduce the likelihood of criminal behavior. Expanding access to mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and social support networks can address the root causes of poverty-related issues and offer a path towards rehabilitation and recovery. Community-based programs that focus on prevention, early intervention, and restorative justice can provide viable alternatives to punitive measures. These programs engage individuals experiencing poverty, offering support, counseling, and resources to address the underlying issues driving criminal behavior. They emphasize rehabilitation, reintegration, and community involvement, fostering a sense of agency, belonging, and opportunity [4].

A critical aspect of combating the criminalization of poverty is shifting the narrative surrounding poverty itself. It is essential to recognize poverty as a social issue that requires a comprehensive response rather than a criminal justice issue that can be solved through punishment alone. This reframing allows for a more compassionate and holistic approach that addresses the structural inequalities and systemic barriers faced by individuals in poverty. Policy reforms should focus on decriminalizing survival behaviors, diverting individuals to supportive services rather than prisons, and promoting policies that reduce poverty and inequality. This includes raising the minimum wage, expanding access to affordable housing, and implementing social safety nets that provide a basic level of economic security for all [5].

Conclusion

The criminalization of poverty perpetuates a vicious cycle that disproportionately affects marginalized communities. It is an approach that fails to address the underlying causes of poverty and instead punishes individuals for their economic circumstances. By shifting the focus towards social and economic interventions, investing in community-based programs, and advocating for policy reform, we can begin to dismantle the criminalization of poverty and foster a society that values compassion, equality, and social justice. Only through such transformative efforts can we break the cycle of poverty and ensure a more equitable and inclusive future for all.

References

  1. Sage WM, Laurin JE. If you would not criminalize poverty, do not medicalize it. J Law Med Ethics 2018;46(3):573-81.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Covin Jr L. Homelessness, poverty, and incarceration: The criminalization of despair. J Forensic Psychol Pract. 2012;12(5):439-56.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Oteng-Ababio M. Beyond poverty and criminalization: Splintering youth groups and ‘conflict of governmentalities’ in urban Ghana. GJG. 2016;8(1):51-78.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  4. Chunn DE, Gavigan SA. Welfare law, welfare fraud, and the moral regulation of the ‘never deserving’poor. Soc Leg Stud. 2004 Jun;13(2):219-43.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Balfour G. Re-imagining a feminist criminology. Can J Criminol Crim Justice. 2006;48(5):735-52.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App