Research in Clinical Dermatology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Short Communication - Research in Clinical Dermatology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

Teledermatology: Exploring Patient and Physician Perspectives on Benefits and Challenges

Esther Fox *

Department of Internal Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Esther Fox
Department of Internal Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, USA
E-mail: esther.f@neomed.edu

Received: 2-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. aarcd-25-157513; Editor assigned: 4-Jan-2025, PreQC No. aarcd-25-157513 (PQ) Reviewed:17-Jan-2025, QC No. aarcd-25-157513Revised:24-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. aarcd-25-157513; Published:31-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.35841/aarcd- 8.1.249

Citation: Fox E. Teledermatology: Exploring patient and physician perspectives on benefits and challenges. Res Clin Dermatol. 2025;8(1):249

Visit for more related articles at Research in Clinical Dermatology

Introduction

Teledermatology, the practice of using digital communication tools to diagnose and manage dermatological conditions remotely, has gained significant momentum in recent years. This technology offers patients access to dermatological care without the need for in-person visits, making it a valuable tool for both healthcare providers and patients. However, despite its growing popularity, there are several advantages and challenges from both the patient's and physician's perspectives. This article explores these perspectives in depth, highlighting the benefits and challenges of teledermatology [1].

One of the primary benefits of teledermatology for patients is the convenience it offers. For individuals living in rural or underserved areas, access to dermatology specialists can be limited. Teledermatology breaks down geographic barriers, allowing patients to receive expert care without needing to travel long distances. This convenience is particularly beneficial for those with chronic skin conditions who require ongoing monitoring but may find it difficult to attend regular in-person consultations [2].

Another advantage of teledermatology is its potential to reduce waiting times. Traditional dermatology appointments often involve long waiting periods due to the high demand for specialists. Through teledermatology, patients can have their skin concerns assessed more quickly, receiving timely advice and prescriptions. This can be especially important for conditions that require early intervention, such as melanoma or other skin cancers, where delayed diagnosis can have serious consequences [3].

Furthermore, teledermatology promotes patient autonomy and comfort. Patients are able to consult with dermatologists from the comfort of their own homes, which can be less intimidating than visiting a clinic. The ability to send high-resolution images of skin conditions also enables patients to discuss their concerns in a more thorough and detailed manner, enhancing the quality of the consultation [4].

For physicians, teledermatology offers the opportunity to reach a broader patient population. Dermatologists can assess and treat a wider range of patients, particularly those in remote areas or those who struggle to schedule in-person visits. This expanded reach not only benefits underserved populations but also helps dermatologists optimize their practice by managing more cases efficiently [5].

Teledermatology also allows dermatologists to focus on more complex cases during in-person consultations while handling routine conditions remotely. By leveraging telemedicine tools, physicians can triage patients based on the severity of their conditions, providing care for less complex issues remotely, while prioritizing more urgent or complicated cases for in-person evaluation. This improves workflow efficiency and enhances patient satisfaction [6].

Additionally, teledermatology can enhance professional collaboration. Physicians can easily share patient images with colleagues or specialists for second opinions or to discuss difficult cases. This collaborative aspect fosters better decision-making and can lead to improved patient outcomes [7].

While teledermatology offers numerous benefits, it also presents challenges for patients. One significant issue is the lack of direct physical examination. Although teledermatology allows dermatologists to assess skin conditions remotely using images, it may not always provide the complete information that can be gathered during an in-person exam. Some conditions, such as inflammatory skin diseases, require tactile examination to assess texture, temperature, and other nuances that images cannot fully convey [8].

Another challenge is technological limitations. Not all patients are comfortable with or have access to the necessary technology, such as smartphones or high-quality cameras, to take clear images of their skin conditions. In some cases, poor image quality can hinder a dermatologist's ability to make an accurate diagnosis. Additionally, older patients or those who are not tech-savvy may find the telemedicine process intimidating or confusing, leading to frustration and a reluctance to engage in virtual consultations [9].

There are also concerns related to the privacy and security of sensitive medical information. While teledermatology platforms are designed to protect patient data, the risk of cyberattacks and breaches of privacy remains a concern for many individuals. Patients may feel uneasy about sharing images of their skin conditions through digital platforms, particularly if they are not fully confident in the security measures in place [10].

Conclusion

Teledermatology offers numerous benefits, including increased access to care, reduced waiting times, and greater convenience for patients. For physicians, it can improve efficiency, expand patient reach, and foster collaboration. However, both patients and physicians face challenges related to technology, the lack of physical examination, and privacy concerns. By addressing these challenges through technological innovation and policy changes, teledermatology can continue to evolve and become a key component of modern dermatological practice, improving patient care and outcomes in the years to come.

References

  1. Armstrong AW, Kwong MW, Chase EP, et al. Teledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: The referring providers' perspective. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(8):580-4.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Démoulins E, Rat C, Martin L, et al. Teledermatology practices: Benefits, limitations and perspectives. Qualitative interview-based study with dermatologists. Ethics Med Public Health. 2021;16:100631.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Chow A, Teo SH, Kong JW, et al. Patients’ experiences of telemedicine for their skin problems: qualitative study. JMIR Dermatol. 2022;5(1):e24956.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Giavina Bianchi M, Santos A, Cordioli E. Dermatologists’ perceptions on the utility and limitations of teledermatology after examining 55,000 lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(3):166-73.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Choi EC, Heng LW, Tan SY, et al. Factors influencing use and perceptions of teledermatology: A mixed-methods study of 942 participants. JAAD International. 2022;6:97-103.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Li Y, Pulminskas A, Collins O, et al. Patient and clinician satisfaction in teledermatology: Key factors for successful implementation. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2023;12(4):161-8.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Coustasse A, Sarkar R, Abodunde B, et al. Use of teledermatology to improve dermatological access in rural areas. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(11):1022-32.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Giansanti D. Advancing dermatological care: A comprehensive narrative review of tele-dermatology and mHealth for bridging gaps and expanding opportunities beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. InHealthcare 2023 (Vol. 11, No. 13, p. 1911). MDPI.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Nikolakis G, Vaiopoulos AG, Georgopoulos I, et al. Insights, advantages, and barriers of teledermatology vs. face-to-face dermatology for the diagnosis and follow-up of non-melanoma skin cancer: A systematic review. Cancers. 2024;16(3):578.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Peracca SB, Fonseca A, Hines A, et al. Implementation of mobile teledermatology: Challenges and opportunities. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(12):1416-22.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App