Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Perspective - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 6

T-Cell Therapies: Revolutionizing the Landscape of Tumor Immunology

Sambriny Pirnie *

Department of Oncology, University of Bologna, Italy

*Corresponding Author:
Sambriny Pirnie
Department of Oncology, University of Bologna, Italy
E-mail: sambrinyp@libero.it

Received: 03-Dec -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-155288; Editor assigned: 04-Dec-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-155288 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Dec-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-155288; Revised:23-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-155288 (R); Published:28-Dec-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.6.236

Citation: Pirnie S. T-cell therapies: Revolutionizing the landscape of tumor immunology. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(6):236

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

T-cell therapies are transforming the field of tumor immunology, offering unprecedented opportunities to treat cancer by harnessing the adaptive immune system. These therapies leverage the specificity and memory of T-cells to target and eliminate tumor cells, making them a cornerstone of modern cancer immunotherapy. CAR T-cells are genetically engineered to express receptors that recognize specific antigens on tumor cells. Approved for hematologic malignancies such as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CAR T-cell therapies are now being adapted for solid tumors [1].

Advances include improving persistence, reducing toxicity, and addressing antigen heterogeneity.TCR therapy involves engineering T-cells to recognize intracellular tumor antigens presented on MHC molecules. It offers broader applicability compared to CAR T-cells, particularly for targeting solid tumors. Research focuses on enhancing TCR affinity and overcoming MHC-restriction barriers [2].

TIL therapy involves isolating and expanding T-cells from the tumor microenvironment. Particularly effective in melanoma, TILs are being explored for other cancers with high mutational burdens. Enhancing the activity and persistence of TILs remains a key area of development [3].

Checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies boost T-cell activity by blocking inhibitory signals. Combination approaches integrating checkpoint inhibitors with T-cell therapies aim to enhance efficacy and overcome resistance [4].

T-cell therapies exploit multiple mechanisms to eliminate tumors T-cells identify tumor-specific or tumor-associated antigens, ensuring targeted cytotoxicity. Activated T-cells secrete cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, which promote tumor cell apoptosis and recruit additional immune cells. T-cells release perforin and granzymes to induce apoptosis in target cells [5].

Memory T-cells provide long-term protection against tumor recurrence. The TME suppresses T-cell activity through hypoxia, immunosuppressive cells (e.g., Tregs and MDSCs), and inhibitory cytokines. Strategies to remodel the TME include combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors, metabolic reprogramming, and TME-targeted agents [6].

Tumors can lose or downregulate target antigens, leading to therapy resistance. Addressing antigen escape involves designing multi-specific CARs or combining T-cell therapies with vaccines to target diverse antigens. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity are significant side effects of T-cell therapies. Improved safety measures, such as dose titration, safety switches, and supportive care protocols, are being developed [7].

Producing personalized T-cell therapies is time-consuming and costly. Efforts to streamline manufacturing, such as allogeneic "off-the-shelf" T-cell therapies, are underway to improve accessibility. Allogeneic CAR T-cells from healthy donors eliminate the need for patient-specific manufacturing. Gene-editing technologies like CRISPR are used to minimize rejection and enhance safety. T-cells are engineered to resist immunosuppressive signals in the TME. Examples include T-cells secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines or expressing dominant-negative receptors [8].

Combining T-cell therapies with checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, or radiation enhances efficacy. Synergistic approaches are particularly promising for overcoming resistance in solid tumors. Advances in synthetic biology enable the design of T-cells with enhanced specificity, safety, and functionality. Examples include synthetic receptors, programmable cytokine release, and dynamic signaling pathways. T-cell therapies continue to evolve, with ongoing research focusing on Extending the success of T-cell therapies beyond hematologic malignancies to solid tumors [9].

Enhancing T-cell persistence and memory for long-term efficacy. Leveraging biomarkers and genomic profiling to tailor T-cell therapies to individual patients. Streamlining production processes and developing universal therapies to make treatments more affordable [10].

Conclusion

T-cell therapies are revolutionizing tumor immunology by offering targeted, durable, and personalized treatment options. As research and clinical applications advance, T-cell therapies hold the potential to address unmet needs in cancer care, bringing us closer to a future where cancer is effectively managed or cured.

References

  1. Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1983;15:10–17.
  2. Indexed at. Google ScholarCross Ref

  3. Murali R, Soslow RA, Weigelt B. Classification of endometrial carcinoma: More than two types. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e268–e278.
  4. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  5. Zannoni GF, Vellone VG, Arena V, et al. Does high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (grade 3 FIGO) belong to type I or type II endometrial cancer? A clinical–pathological and immunohistochemical study.Virchows Arch. 2010;457:27–34.
  6. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  7. Bae HS, Kim H, Kwon SY, et al. Should endometrial clear cell carcinoma be classified as Type II endometrial carcinoma? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015;34:74–84.
  8. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  9. Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.Ann Oncol. 2016;27:16–41.
  10. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  11. Fisher C. Synovial sarcoma.Ann Diagn Pathol. 1999;2:401–421.
  12. Indexed at. Google ScholarCross Ref

  13. Thway K, Fisher C. Synovial sarcoma: defining features and diagnostic evolution.Ann Diagn Pathol. United States. 2014;18:369–380.
  14. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  15. Ishibe T, Nakayama T, Aoyama T, et al. Neuronal differentiation of synovial sarcoma and its therapeutic application.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2147–55.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Garcia C, Shaffer CM, Alfaro M, et al. Reprogramming of mesenchymal stem cells by the synovial sarcoma-associated oncogene SYT-SSX2. 2011;31:2323–334.
  18. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  19. Naka N, Takenaka S, Araki N, et al. Synovial sarcoma is a stem cell malignancy.Stem Cells. 2010;28:1119–131.
  20. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

Get the App