Journal of Environmental Waste Management and Recycling

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 1518081136

Commentary - Journal of Environmental Waste Management and Recycling (2024) Volume 7, Issue 6

Sustainable Packaging: A Step Toward Reducing Environmental Impact

Blanca Erkmen*

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Netherlands

*Corresponding Author:
Blanca Erkmen
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development
Utrecht University, Netherlands
E-mail: b.c.erkmenbellostas@uu.nl

Received: 01-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAEWMR-24-155188; Editor assigned: 05-Nov-2024, Pre QC No. AAEWMR-24-155188 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-Nov-2024, QC No. AAEWMR-24-155188; Revised: 22-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAEWMR-24-155188 (R); Published: 29-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaewmr-8.6.234

Citation: Erkmen B. Sustainable Packaging: A Step Toward Reducing Environmental Impact. 2024; 7(6):234

Abstract

  

Introduction

In today’s world, packaging plays an essential role in the global economy, protecting products during transport and preserving their quality. However, the environmental toll of conventional packaging, particularly single-use plastics, has become a significant concern. As the world grapples with the consequences of plastic pollution, sustainable packaging has emerged as a viable solution to reduce waste, conserve resources, and lessen the environmental footprint of packaging materials [1-3].

Sustainable packaging

Sustainable packaging refers to packaging solutions that have a minimal impact on the environment, from production to disposal. These materials are designed to be recyclable, biodegradable, compostable, or reusable. By shifting away from traditional plastic packaging, which can take hundreds of years to decompose, sustainable packaging uses renewable resources such as paper, glass, or plant-based plastics (bioplastics) that are easier to recycle and often have a lower carbon footprint [4-6]. One of the key benefits of sustainable packaging is its role in reducing plastic waste. Single-use plastics, which are often used for packaging, contribute significantly to landfills and marine pollution. By using biodegradable or recyclable alternatives, businesses can help reduce plastic waste and lower the environmental impact of packaging. Materials like corrugated cardboard, aluminium, and bioplastics can be reused or recycled multiple times, reducing the need for virgin materials and conserving natural resources.

Moreover, sustainable packaging can also promote the concept of a circular economy. Products made from recycled materials can be returned to the supply chain and used to create new packaging or products, closing the loop on material use and minimizing waste [7, 8]. Companies are also adopting minimalist packaging designs, reducing the amount of material used and thereby lowering transportation emissions and material costs. However, challenges remain. Sustainable packaging materials can sometimes be more expensive or require new infrastructure for recycling and processing. Additionally, public education on the proper disposal of these materials is critical to ensure their effectiveness in waste management systems [9, 10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, sustainable packaging represents a vital step toward reducing waste and minimizing the environmental impact of packaging in today’s consumer-driven world. By embracing eco-friendly materials, recycling, and reusing packaging, businesses and consumers can help reduce plastic pollution and conserve valuable natural resources. While the transition to sustainable packaging may come with challenges, its long-term environmental benefits make it a key solution in the global effort to create a more sustainable and eco-conscious future.

References

  1. Walsh D, Downe S. Meta?synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 50(2):204-11.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. World Health Organization, 2020. World Report of Physical Health.
  4. Theng YL, Chua PH, Pham TP. Wii as entertainment and socialisation aids for mental and social health of the elderly. InCHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012; 691-702.
  5. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  6. Liang Y. Heterogeneity in the trajectories of depressive symptoms among elderly adults in rural China: The role of housing characteristics. Health & place. 2020; 66:102449.
  7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Garin N, Olaya B, Miret M, et al. Built environment and elderly population health: a comprehensive literature review. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health: CP & EMH. 2014; 10:103.
  9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Wiles JL, Allen RE, Palmer AJ, et al. Older people and their social spaces: A study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(4):664-71.
  11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  12. James P, Nadarajah Y, Haive K, et al. Sustainable communities, sustainable development: other paths for Papua New Guinea. University of Hawaii Press; 2012.
  13. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  14. Paul DR. Polymer Blends Volume 1. Elsevier; 2012.
  15. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  16. Li C, Jiang S, Zhang X. Intergenerational relationship, family social support, and depression among Chinese elderly: A structural equation modeling analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019; 248:73-80.
  17. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  18. Desiningrum DR. Grandparents' roles and psychological well-being in the elderly: a correlational study in families with an autistic child. Enfermeria clinica. 2018; 28:304-9.
  19. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App