Journal of Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Rapid Communication - Journal of Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases (2024) Volume 9, Issue 3

Surgical Options for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder: What You Need to Know

Jillian Pandya *

Department of General Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

*Corresponding Author:
Jillian Pandya
Department of General Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
E-mail: pjillian@tu.ir.in

Received:21-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. JGDD-24-138844; Editor assigned: 22-Apr-2024, PreQC No. JGDD-24-138844(PQ); Reviewed: 06-May-2024, QC No. JGDD-24-138844; Revised: 10-May-2024, Manuscript No. JGDD-24-138844(R); Published: 17-May-2024, DOI: 10.35841/jgdd -9.3.208

Citation: : Pandya J. Surgical options for severe gastroesophageal reflux disorder: What you need to know. J Gastroenterol Dig Dis.2024;9(3):208

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Gastroenterology and Digestive Diseases

Introduction

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder (GERD) is a common condition that affects millions of people worldwide. For many, lifestyle changes and medications can effectively manage the symptoms. However, some individuals suffer from severe GERD that does not respond adequately to these conventional treatments. In such cases, surgical options may be necessary to provide relief and prevent complications. Understanding these surgical options is crucial for patients and healthcare providers to make informed decisions [1].

When considering surgery for GERD, it is essential to understand the anatomy and physiology involved. GERD occurs when the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), a ring of muscle at the junction of the esophagus and stomach, fails to close properly, allowing stomach acid to flow back into the esophagus. This acid reflux can cause symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain. In severe cases, it can lead to complications like esophagitis, strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and even esophageal cancer [2].

Several surgical options are available to treat severe GERD, each with its own benefits, risks, and indications. The most common surgical procedure for GERD is fundoplication. There are also less invasive techniques and newer methods that have shown promise in managing this condition [3].

Fundoplication is the most widely performed surgical procedure for GERD. The goal of fundoplication is to reinforce the LES, thereby preventing acid reflux. This is achieved by wrapping the top part of the stomach (the fundus) around the lower end of the esophagus and stitching it in place. This increases the pressure at the LES, reducing the likelihood of acid reflux [4].

There are different types of fundoplication, with the most common being Nissen fundoplication, where the stomach is wrapped 360 degrees around the esophagus. Other variations include partial wraps like the Toupet (270 degrees) and Dor (180 degrees) fundoplications. The choice of procedure depends on the patient's specific condition, anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise [5].

Fundoplication can be performed using traditional open surgery or a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the preferred method due to its advantages, including smaller incisions, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times. During the procedure, a laparoscope (a thin tube with a camera) and specialized instruments are inserted through small incisions in the abdomen to perform the surgery [6].

The benefits of the LINX procedure include a shorter recovery time compared to traditional fundoplication and the preservation of normal physiological function of the LES. However, potential risks include difficulty swallowing, pain, nausea, and the need for device removal in some cases if complications arise [7].

The advantages of TIF include the absence of external incisions, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker recovery times. Studies have shown that TIF can be effective in managing GERD symptoms, though long-term data is still limited. As with other procedures, potential risks include difficulty swallowing, bloating, and the possibility of needing additional treatments if symptoms persist [8].

For patients with large hiatal hernias, a condition where part of the stomach pushes through the diaphragm into the chest cavity, surgical repair of the hernia may be necessary in conjunction with anti-reflux surgery. Hiatal hernia repair involves pulling the stomach back into the abdomen and repairing the diaphragm opening to prevent the hernia from recurring. This can be done using open surgery or a laparoscopic approach [9].

Patients considering surgical options for GERD should undergo a thorough evaluation to determine the most appropriate treatment. This evaluation typically includes a detailed medical history, physical examination, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. These tests help assess the severity of GERD, the function of the LES, and the presence of any anatomical abnormalities like hiatal hernias [10].

Conclusion

Surgical options for severe GERD provide effective relief for patients who do not respond to lifestyle changes and medications. Fundoplication, the LINX Reflux Management System, and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) are among the available surgical treatments, each with its own benefits and risks. A thorough evaluation and discussion with a healthcare provider are essential to determine the most appropriate surgical option. With proper management and follow-up, patients can achieve significant improvement in their GERD symptoms and overall quality of life.

References

  1. Talley NJ, Zand Irani M. Optimal management of severe symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2021;289(2):162-78.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Crossan K, Sheer AJ. Surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Xie L, Quiroz HJ, Kutlu OC, et al. Long-term outcomes after adolescent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;235(4):592-602.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Rossetti D, Isoldi S, Oliva S. Eosinophilic esophagitis: update on diagnosis and treatment in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs. 2020;22(4):343-56.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Shin YL, Park SH, Kwon Y, et al. Restoration for the foregut surgery: bridging gaps between foregut surgery practice and academia. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021;24(4):175.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Dolet N, Marret JB, Petit T, et al. Assessment of quality of life after laparoscopic GERD surgery in children: a prospective study. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(5):2005-12.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Asti E, Milito P, Froiio C, et al. Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus. 2023;36(1):090.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Colvin JS, Jalilvand AD, Um P, et al. Mid-term Outcomes of Nissen Fundoplication Versus Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass for Primary Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Obesity. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023;33(6):627-31.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Bazerbachi F, Krishnan K, Dayyeh BK. Endoscopic GERD therapy: a primer for the transoral incisionless fundoplication procedure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(3):370-83.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Coletta R, Aldeiri B, Jackson R, et al. Total esophagogastric dissociation (TEGD): Lessons from two decades of experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(6):1214-9.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App