+1 (202) 780-3397
Mini Review - Allied Journal of Medical Research (2022) Volume 6, Issue 12
Replacing a broken paradigm for STD control and prevention.
Bosena Endalew*
Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada
- *Corresponding Author:
- Bosena Endalew
Department of Psychology,
Toronto Metropolitan University,
Canada
E-mail:endalew_bo765@gmail.com
Received: 28-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AAAJMR-22-84490; Editor assigned: 30-Nov-2022, PreQC No. AAAJMR-22-84490(PQ); Reviewed: 15-Dec-2022, QC No. AAAJMR-22-84490; Revised: 19-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. AAAJMR-22-84490(R); Published: 26-Dec-2022, DOI:10.35841/ aaajmr-6.12.160
Citation: Endalew B. Replacing a broken paradigm for STD control and prevent. Allied J Med Res. 2022;6(12):160
Abstract
Since the 1980s, when HIV first appeared, STI reduction initiatives have become more closely tied to HIV programme aims. Despite the fact that HIV is a STI in and of it, attempts to stop its spread are primarily handled through programmes that are funded, carried out, and assessed separately from other STI control initiatives. Unfavourable effects resulted from a paradigm that is so shattered. Too frequently, inadequate financing causes neglected STI programmes to fail. These programmes served as the cornerstone for HIV prevention initiatives. Pregnant women may be provided HIV testing but are no longer examined for syphilis, and STI reporting, a key indicator of trends in sexual transmission, has entirely collapsed. As a result, STI clinics and services are understaffed, under stocked, or have completely disappeared.
Keywords
Sexually transmitted infections, HIV, Paradigm.
Introduction
It is possible to control sexually transmitted infections, which also improves sexual and reproductive health and helps stop the spread of HIV. Poor STI control led to the most advanced HIV epidemics, especially in areas with a high prevalence of ulcerative STIs. The HIV epidemics in a number of nations that have successfully managed STIs have shown signs of stabilization or reversal. Reduced incidence and prevalence of STIs are public health outcomes used to quantify STI control. The ways to do this are I to target and reach out to people that are most at risk; (ii) to promote and provide condoms and other forms of prevention; (iii) to use effective therapeutic interventions; (iv) to create an atmosphere that is supportive; and (v) to use trustworthy data [1]. STI case management, sex partner screening, and STI management are all clinical services. For the majority of symptomatic curable STIs, syndromic case management is beneficial, and screening techniques are available to find certain silent infections. Sex partners and sex workers should be treated presumptively in order to prevent transmission and lower prevalence. Since many patients with STIs do not visit clinics, clinical services alone are not enough to control the condition. Reaching such populations has been accomplished through outreach and peer education. Effective interventions are needed to manage STIs in core populations where partner turnover rates are high enough to support transmission. Thus, precise, effective targeting is essential and frequently sufficient to lower frequency in the general population [2].
Absolute or relative measures of STI control include, for instance, the elimination of cancroids or a 50% decrease in the prevalence of gonorrhoea. Monitoring etiological or syndrome trends of prevalent treatable STIs can show changes in occurrence. These statistics also reflect broad trends in sexual transmission and can be used to gauge the effectiveness of overall STI/HIV prevention efforts in areas where STI monitoring is supported and operating. HIV prevention can logically be positioned within the larger, all-encompassing domain of STI control because HIV and other STIs share many characteristics with each other, including mechanisms of transmission, behavioural and other cofactors, and potential control strategies [3].
In order to interrupt the chain of infection, STI case management seeks to treat patients who arrive with symptoms quickly and effectively. An essential goal in the management of STI epidemics is to reduce the period of infectivity. Strong evidence supports the effectiveness of syndromic case management in treating patients with urethral discharge and genital ulcers. In the majority of service delivery scenarios, it is superior to earlier methods. Despite not being intended to identify silent cervical infections, syndromic case management performs well for common vaginal infections. Asymptomatic infections can be found using tried-and-true methods like STI screening and case finding. Although practicable, cervical infection screening continues to pose challenges since sensitive tests for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infection are still too expensive for general usage [4].
Clinical therapies by alone are insufficient to control STIs. Primary prevention measures are needed where transmission occurs, at the clinic and outdoors. Such initiatives include a strong emphasis on prevention strategies, education, and clinical treatment referrals. There is compelling evidence that male latex condoms lower the risk of unwanted pregnancy, are effective against the majority of other STIs, and limit HIV transmission by at least 80–85%. The female condom, for example, may be preferable than the male condom in some circumstances or as a backup technique. The aim for the STI control programme is to increase access to condoms and other preventative measures, make them more inexpensive, encourage use, and remove obstacles to use [5].
Conclusion
Unprotected sex work and inflammatory STIs are the main contributing elements that combine to generate the "perfect storm" that is necessary for the rapid spread of HIV epidemics. Uncircumcised men and environments with mobile populations are more likely to have such problems. Because programme resources are controlled by decisions relating to a single disease entity, basic STI care are in disarray in many countries. Such a disjointed worldview is harmful for both HIV and other STIs. Poor STI control led to major HIV epidemics that spread quickly, and if STI control continues to deteriorate, other HIV preventive measures may be seriously hampered. However, the experiences of such diverse nations as Cambodia, Kenya, Senegal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand show that expanding STI control is both practical and can increase HIV prevention.
References
- Peeling RW, Mabey D, Fitzgerald DW, et al. Avoiding HIV and dying of syphilis.The Lancet. 2004;364(9445):1561-3.
- Chanda E, Masaninga F, Coleman M, et al. Integrated vector management: the Zambian experience. Malar J. 2008;7(1):1-8.
- Merson M, Padian N, Coates TJ, et al. Combination HIV prevention.The Lancet. 2008;372(9652):1805-6.
- Jana S, Basu I, Rotheram-Borus MJ, et al. The Sonagachi Project: a sustainable community intervention program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):405-14.
- Rehle T, Lazzari S, Dallabetta G, et al. Second-generation HIV surveillance: better data for decision-making. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:121-7.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref