Research Article - Biomedical Research (2017) Volume 28, Issue 22

Relationship of IL-18 genetic polymorphism to cervical cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Bo Gao^#, Shujuan Yang^# and Ningxiu Li^*

Department of Health Related Social and Behavioral Science, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

^#These authors contributed equally to this work

*Corresponding Author:

Ningxiu Li
Department of Health Related Social and Behavioral Science
West China School of Public Health, China

Accepted on October 23, 2017

Abstract

Published studies about the association between Interleukin-18 (IL-18) gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer susceptibility were inconsistent. A meta-analysis for the association between IL-18-607C/A (rs1946518) and risk of cervical cancer was carried out to collectively analyse existing comparative studies. PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index (SCI), CNKI and Wanfang were researched on the associations between Interleukin-18 and cervical cancer risk. Five studies with 775 cervical cancer patients and 1004 controls met the criteria and included into this study. By meta-analysis analyses, we found that IL-18 rs1946518 CA and AA genotypes were not significantly associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer. The heterogeneities existed in the association between the IL-18 rs1946518 AA genotype and risk of cervical cancer in comparison to the CC genotype (P for heterogeneity<0.001, I²=87.2%). We found that the AA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 was associated with a decreased risk of cervical cancer in studies with population-based design, when compared with the CC genotype (OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.04-0.98). In summary, our meta-analysis suggests that IL-18 polymorphism may not contribute to the development of cervical cancer, but the IL-18-607 AA genotype is associated with cervical cancer risk in studies with population-based design. Further studies with well study design and large sample size are greatly needed to confirm the association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 and cervical cancer risk.

Keywords

IL-18-607C/A, rs1946518, Polymorphism, Cervical cancer.

Introduction

Cervical cancer is the second most common form of cancer diagnosed in women and the third leading cause of death from cancer, accounting for about 8% of total cancer cases and cancer deaths in women [1]. It is estimated that there were an estimated 528,000 new cases and 266,000 deaths in 2012 worldwide in 2012 [2]. Cervical cancer affects the cervix and includes squamous cell carcinomas (90%), adenocarcinoma (10%), and other subtypes [3,4]. The etiology of cervical cancer has been largely attributed to infection of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) [5-7]. However, HPV infection does not necessarily lead to cervical cancers, only a few of these infected cases would develop cervical cancer during their lifetime [8].

Chronic systemic inflammation has emerged as an important factor in the pathogenesis of chronic diseases, including cervical cancer [9,10]. Inflammatory cytokines may be important factors in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer [10,11]. IL-18, pro-inflammatory cytokine, induces the production of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), and it promotes IL-6 synthesis and regulates C-reactive protein synthesis in the liver [12-14]. IL-18-607C/A (rs1946518) is located in the up-stream of IL-18 gene, and previous studies have reported their association between IL-18-607C/A (rs1946518) polymorphisms and risk of cervical cancer, but they are controversial. The discrepancy may be attributed to the relatively small sample size of previous studies and the genetic heterogeneity of polymorphisms in cervical cancer among different populations. Therefore, further reconcile these conflicting findings to obtain a more definitive conclusion using multiple statistical analysis, a meta-analysis for the association between IL-18-607C/A (rs1946518) and risk of cervical cancer was carried out to collectively analyse existing comparative studies.

Materials and Methods

Literature search

A comprehensive literature search was independently performed by two of the authors until June 1, 2017 without restriction on the geographic region or language of publication on the following online databases: PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index (SCI), CNKI and Wanfang. References appearing in relevant reports and recent reviews were all screened to identify potential articles of interest. The following keywords and subject terms “Interleukin-18”, “polymorphism” and “cervical cancer” were used in databases. All references in these studies were examined to identify additional research not indexed by the databases. We selected only published articles written in English or in Chinese.

Inclusion criteria

Studies included in the current meta-analysis had to meet the following criteria: 1) the study design had to be a case-control study (including retrospective or prospective studies); 2) the focus had to be on IL-18 promoter polymorphisms (-607C/A; rs1946518); 3) the case group had to include women with cervical cancer and control group women without cervical cancer; 4) the reports had to include sufficient information on the frequency distribution of different genotypes to calculate the Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs); 5) in the case of duplicate studies, we included the most recent or those with the largest samples.

Data extraction and quality evalution

Two investigators independently extracted the following information from all the included studies: first author, year of publication, study country or region where the study was performed, ethnicity (Asian, Caucasian or African), source of the controls, sample sizes for patients and controls, data on the frequency distribution of different genotypes, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for controls, and the genotyping method.

Statistical analysis

ORs with 95% CIs were calculated to assess the strength of the association between IL-18 polymorphisms and cervical cancer susceptibility. For the IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 polymorphism, the following three genetic models were used: co-dominant, dominant and recessive models. The Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group was assessed, and a P<0.05 was considered as significant disequilibrium. Subgroup analysis was performed according to ethnicity difference, control design, and genotyping method. Heterogeneity between studies was determined by means of Cochran’s Q-test and I² statistic. The fixed-effect model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) was used when the P-value was more than 0.10 and I² was less than 40%, while a randomeffects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to evaluate the robustness of our results. Egger's linear regression and Begg’s funnel plots were used to examine potential publication bias All statistical calculations were performed with STATA version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). A twosided P value<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Study characteristics

Initially, a total of forty one articles were identified in the initial search. The title and duplicate screening step excluded 15 studies. Of the remaining 26 studies, 21 studies were excluded due to not on the research polymorphism locus. Finally, five studies involving 775 cervical cancer patients and 1004 controls met the criteria and included into this study [15-19]. Among these studies, four studies were in Asian population, and one study in Brazil population (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flow diagram of study selection.

Association between IL-18 rs1946518 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk

By meta-analysis analyses, we found that IL-18 rs1946518 CA genotype was not significantly associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer in fix-effect model, when compared with the CC genotype (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.71-1.14, P=0.37, Figure 2). The AA genotype was not related to an elevated risk of cervical cancer in random-effect model, when compared with the CC genotype (OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.38-2.76, P=0.97, Figure 3). We found that the heterogeneities existed in the association between the IL-18 rs1946518 AA genotype and risk of cervical cancer in comparison to the CC genotype (P for heterogeneity<0.001, I2=87.2%, Tables 1,2).

Figure 2: Forest plot for the comparison of the CA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 with the CC genotype in the risk of cervical cancer.

Figure 3: Forest plot for the comparison of the AA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 with the CC genotype in the risk of cervical cancer.

Table 1. Characteristics of studies on the association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 and cervical cancer risk.

Table 2. Genotype distributions of studies on IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 polymorphism and association with risk of cervical cancer.

Subgroup analysis

We performed subgroup analyses based on the HWE status, the control design and genotyping method (Table 3). We did not find significant association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer by stratified analysis on HWE status, ethnicity and genotype method. However, we found that the AA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 was associated with an decreased risk of cervical cancer in studies with population-based design, when compared with the CC genotype (OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.04-0.98) (Table 3).

Table 3. Subgroup analysis for the association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer.

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

By using a stepwise process, meta-analysis was performed repeatedly when each particular study was sequentially excluded. We found that the removal of any study one by one did not alter the statistical results. Egger’s test was performed to assess publication bias of the literature. The shape of the funnel plot was symmetrical and the statistical results did not show any publication bias (Egger’s test: P=0.36 for IL-18-607CA vs. CC, Figure 4; Egger’s test: P=0.96 for IL-18-607AA vs. CC, Figure 5).

Figure 4: Begg?s funnel plot of publication bias for the comparison of the CA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 with the CC genotype in the risk of cervical cancer.

Figure 5: Begg?s funnel plot of publication bias for the comparison of the AA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 with the CC genotype in the risk of cervical cancer

Discussion

Development of cervical cancer is involved in both oncogenic HPV infection and host immunity. HPV plays an important role in directly subverting the immunity through interfering with the interferon pathway, modulating the antigen presentation and suppressing the IL-18 activity [21,22]. IL-18, T-helper 1-type cytokines, could contribute to the cellmediated immunity. Previous study reported that both E6 and E7 oncoproteins of HPV could inhibit IL-18 induced IFN-γ production in human peripheral blood mononuclear and NK cells through inhibition of IL-18 binding to its alpha-chain receptor [23]. They also reported that IL-18 expression was downregulated in HPV-positive cervical cancer cells by combining E6 oncoprotein with IL-18 [24]. Therefore, IL-18 plays an important role in protective cell-mediated immunity against HPV infections [24], and thus influences the pathogenesis of cervical cancer.

Since 2006, a large number of molecular epidemiological casecontrol studies have been conducted to explore the association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 polymorphism in a Chinese population, and the AA genotype was associated with a reduced risk of cervical cancer when compared with the CC genotype (OR=0.36, 95% CI=0.16-0.84) [15]. Another study in China also reported a significant association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 AA genotype and risk of cervical cancer (OR=0.06, 95% CI=0.004-0.58) [17]. However, two recent studies in China reported inconsistent results. Qi et al. found that IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 AA was significant associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer in comparison to the CC genotype [16]. Yang et al. did not report a significant association between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk [18]. In a Brazil population, Mayara et al. did not find a significant association between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk [19]. There is still controversy about the relationship between these two polymorphisms and cervical cancer susceptibility. In this study, we firstly performed a meta-analysis on the association between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk. We found no significant association was found between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk, but we observed that the AA genotype of IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 was associated with a decreased risk of cervical cancer in studies with population-based design. Therefore, further studies with well study design and large sample size are greatly needed to confirm the association between IL-18-607C/A rs1946518 and cervical cancer risk.

Limitations

Some limitations of this study that should be addressed. First, only five publications were included in our meta-analysis, and the limited number and sample size for the polymorphic locus may reduce the reliability of the results and affect the assessment of associations between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk. Second, additional risk factors, such as smoking, drinking, and HPV infection, were not considered. The interactions of genetic and environmental factors on cancer development could not be evaluated in our analysis. Fourth, the heterogeneity that exists in studies on comparison of IL-18-607AA vs. CC genotype could influence the current results and distort the conclusions. In this regard, the meta-regression analysis could not find the source of the heterogeneity, although it could be reduced in the subgroup analysis.

As far as we know, this is the first meta-analysis to examine the association between IL-18-607C/A polymorphism and cervical cancer risk. However, our meta-analysis suggests that the IL-18-607C/A could not influence the cervical cancer susceptibility, but the IL-18-607 AA genotype is associated with cervical cancer risk in studies with population-based design.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported from the Health Related Quality of Life in community neighborhood of Chengdu Hi-Tech Zone (H160626).

References

1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 87-108.
2. Cancer IAfRo. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. 2012 cited 2012 2015-12-01; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx.
3. Wang SS, Sherman ME, Hildesheim A, Lacey JJ, Devesa S. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976-2000. Cancer 2004; 100: 1035-1044.
4. Nedovic J, Protrka Z, Ninkovic S, Mitrovic S, Vojinovic R. Cisplatin monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy versus combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced cervical carcinoma. J Buon 2012; 17: 740-745.
5. Scheller J, Ohnesorge N, Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 trans-signalling in chronic inflammation and cancer. Scand J Immunol 2006; 63: 321-329.
6. Woodman CB, Collins S, Winter H, Bailey A, Ellis J, Prior P, Yates M, Rollason TP, Young LS. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1831-1836.
7. Quan Y, Zhou B, Wang Y, Duan R, Wang K. Association between IL17 polymorphisms and risk of cervical cancer in Chinese women. Clin Dev Immunol 2012; 2012: 258293.
8. Duenas-Gonzalez A, Serrano-Olvera A, Cetina L, Coronel J. New molecular targets against cervical cancer. Int J Womens Health 2014; 6: 1023-1031.
9. Deivendran S, Marzook KH, Radhakrishna Pillai M. The role of inflammation in cervical cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 816: 377-399.
10. Parida S, Mandal M. Inflammation induced by human papillomavirus in cervical cancer and its implication in prevention. Eur J Cancer Prev 2014; 23: 432-448.
11. Wang Y, Liu XH, Li YH, Li O. The paradox of IL-10-mediated modulation in cervical cancer. Biomed Rep 2013; 1: 347-351.
12. Heinrich PC, Castell JV, Andus T. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. Biochem J 1990; 265: 621-636.
13. Okamura H, Tsutsui H, Kashiwamura S, Yoshimoto T, Nakanishi K. Interleukin-18: a novel cytokine that augments both innate and acquired immunity. Adv Immunol 1998; 70: 281-312.
14. Stephens JM, Butts MD, Pekala PH. Regulation of transcription factor mRNA accumulation during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation by tumour necrosis factor-alpha. J Mol Endocrinol 1992; 9: 61-72.
15. Yang HL, Pin BH, Wang Q, Zheng L, Tang W, Qi T, Bao J. Association of interleukin-18 gene rs1946519 and rs360718 single nucleotide fpolymorphism with cervical cancer. J South Med Univ 2007; 27: 1006-1008.
16. Qi T, Wang Q, Zheng L, Yang HL, Bao J. Correlation of serum IL-18 level and IL-18 gene promoter polymorphisms to the risk of cervical cancer. J South Med Univ 2008; 28: 754-757.
17. Yang HL, Wang Q, Tang W, Guo CJ, Qi T, Ping BH. Screening polymorphisms of IL-18 gene in cervical cancer patients by sequencing. Maternal Child Health Care China 2008; 23: 1402-1404.
18. Yang YC, Chang TY, Chen TC, Chang SC, Lin WS. Genetic variants in interleukin-18 gene and risk for cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Immunol 2013; 74: 882-887.
19. Tavares MC, de Lima Júnior SF, Coelho AV, Marques TR, de Araújo DH, Heráclio Sde A, Amorim MM, de Souza PR, Crovella S. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and interleukin (IL) 18 genes polymorphisms are correlated with susceptibility to HPV infection in patients with and without cervical intraepithelial lesion. Ann Hum Biol 2016; 43: 261-268.
20. Goncalves FT, Cezario SM, Calastri MC, Oliveira CI, Souza DR, Pinhel MA, Cotrim CC, Jorge R, Siqueira RC. Influence of VEGF-C936T genetic variant on age-related macular degeneration. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2015; 78: 290-294.
21. Sanchez E, Palomino-Morales RJ, Ortego-Centeno N, Jimenez-Alonso J, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Lopez-Nevot MA, Sanchez-Román J, de Ramon E, Gonzalez-Escribano MF, Pons-Estel BA, D'Alfonso S, Sebastiani G, Alarcon-Riquelme M, Martín J. Identification of a new putative functional IL18 gene variant through an association study in systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18: 3739-3748.
22. Einstein MH, Schiller JT, Viscidi RP, Strickler HD, Coursaget P, Tan T, Halsey N, Jenkins D. Clinician's guide to human papillomavirus immunology: knowns and unknowns. Lancet Infect Dis 2009; 9: 347-356.
23. Lee SJ, Cho YS, Cho MC, Shim JH, Lee KA, Ko KK, Choe YK, Park SN, Hoshino T, Kim S, Dinarello CA, Yoon D. Both E6 and E7 oncoproteins of human papillomavirus 16 inhibit IL-18-induced IFN-gamma production in human peripheral blood mononuclear and NK cells. J Immunol 2001; 167: 497-504.
24. Cho YS, Kang JW, Cho M, Cho CW, Lee S. Down modulation of IL-18 expression by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncogene via binding to IL-18. FEBS Lett 2001; 501: 139-145.