Mini Review - Otolaryngology Online Journal (2024) Volume 14, Issue 1
Quality of Life After Oropharyngeal Cancer Treatment: Challenges and Supportive Therapies
Bryan Harrison *
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Mainz, Medical Center, Germany
- *Corresponding Author:
- Bryan Harrison
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Mainz, Medical Center, Germany
E-mail: harrisonbryan@mkg.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Received: 29-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. JORL-23- 123747; Editor assigned: 01-Jan-2024, PreQC No. JORL-23- 123747; Reviewed:15-Jan-2024, QC No. JORL-23- 123747; Revised:20-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. JORL-23- 123747 (R); Published:27-Jan-2024, DOI:10.35841/ jorl-14.1.367
Introduction
Quality of life after oropharyngeal cancer treatment is a complex landscape, often marked by numerous challenges that persist long after the completion of therapies. These challenges encompass various facets of physical, emotional, and social well-being, presenting hurdles that impact everyday life [1].
Physical Impacts: The aftermath of treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy can lead to persistent issues like difficulty swallowing, eating, and speaking. These physical challenges significantly affect nutritional intake, leading to weight loss and malnutrition [2].
Communication Barriers: Changes in speech or voice quality due to damage caused by treatment impact one's ability to communicate effectively. Speech therapy becomes essential for rehabilitation, but progress can be gradual and demanding [3].
Emotional Strain: The emotional toll of battling cancer and enduring its treatments lingers long after the physical scars have healed. Anxiety, depression, and fear of recurrence can deeply affect mental health and overall quality of life [4].
Social Isolation: Coping with changes in communication and physical appearance might lead to withdrawal from social interactions, causing feelings of loneliness and isolation.Persistent Fatigue: Lingering fatigue, both physical and mental, can persist post-treatment, hindering daily activities and affecting one's ability to engage fully in life [5].
Dental and Oral Health Issues: Complications like dental problems due to radiation therapy can affect eating and speaking abilities, further adding to the challenges of daily life.Nutritional Struggles: Difficulties in swallowing or changes in taste perception can make it challenging to maintain a balanced diet, impacting overall health and recovery [6].
Financial Hardships: The financial strain of cancer treatment and subsequent therapies can create a burden, affecting the quality of life and adding stress to an already challenging situation [7].
Impact on Caregivers: The toll of cancer is not solely on the patient; caregivers often experience significant emotional, physical, and financial stress, impacting their own quality of life. Supportive Therapies' Role: Access to a comprehensive range of supportive therapies—speech rehabilitation, nutritional counseling, support groups, and psychological assistance—is crucial in addressing these challenges and enhancing the survivor's quality of life [8].
Rehabilitation Programs' Impact: Specialized rehabilitation programs focusing on speech, swallowing, and physical therapy play a pivotal role in restoring functionality and improving overall quality of life for survivors of oropharyngeal cancer [9].
Treatment for oropharyngeal cancer can significantly impact one's quality of life, presenting a myriad of challenges post-treatment. Initially, the physical toll of therapies like surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy can lead to difficulties in swallowing, speaking, and breathing. These immediate challenges often persist even after treatment completion, affecting day-to-day activities and overall well-being [10].
conclusion
The journey post-oropharyngeal cancer treatment is riddled with multifaceted challenges that require a holistic and multidisciplinary approach. The integration of medical, psychological, and rehabilitative support is imperative in addressing these challenges and enhancing the overall well-being of survivors and their caregivers. While the obstacles may seem daunting, the advancements in supportive therapies and a growing understanding of survivorship care offer hope for an improved quality of life post-treatment. With continued research, comprehensive care, and a supportive network, survivors can navigate these challenges and strive for a fulfilling life beyond cancer
References
- Khan MN, Hueniken K, Manojlovic?Kolarski M, et al. Out?of?pocket costs associated with head and neck cancer treatment. Cancer Reports. 2022 ;5(7):e1528.
- Massa ST, Chidambaram S, Luong P, et al. Quantifying total and out-of-pocket costs associated with head and neck cancer survivorship. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2022;148(12):1111-9.
- Longo CJ, Deber R, Fitch M, et al. An examination of cancer patients’ monthly ‘out?of?pocket’costs in Ontario, Canada. European journal of cancer care. 2007;16(6):500-7.
- Zumsteg ZS, Kim S, David JM, et al. Impact of concomitant chemoradiation on survival for patients with T1?2N1 head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(9):1555-65.
- Howard J, Masterson L, Dwivedi RC, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small?volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016(12).
- Furness S, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, et al. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(4).
- Brennan K, Hall S, Yoo J, et al. Routine follow?up care for head and neck cancer after curative treatment: A 3?year experience of measuring patients' self?reported needs, preferences, quality of life and attitudes towards follow?up. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2022;31(3):e13581.
- Moergel M, Jahn-Eimermacher A, Krummenauer F, et al. Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal and floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma and concomitant histological verification of singular ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (pN1-state)-A prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a comprehensive cohort design. Trials. 2009;10(1):1-8.
- Rieger J, Bohle III G, Huryn J, et al. Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009;22(6).
- Provinciali L, Lattanzi S, Chiarlone R, et al. Topical pharmacologic approach with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in the treatment of localized neuropathic pain. Minerva Medica. 2014;105(6):515-27.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref