Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Rapid Communication - Archives of Industrial Biotechnology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

Proteomic analysis in cancer research: A comprehensive review

Rubin Banerjee*

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Rubin Banerjee
Department of Biomedical Data Science
Stanford University
Stanford, USA
E-mail:rubinbaerjee@hotmail.com

Received: 22-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144201; Editor assigned: 24-Jul-2024, PreQC No. AAAIB-24-144201 (PQ); Reviewed: 05-Aug-2024, QC No. AAAIB-24-144201; Revised: 16-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144201 (R); Published: 21-Aug-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaaib- 8.4.217

Citation: Banerjee R. Proteomic analysis in cancer research: A comprehensive review. Arch Ind Biot. 2024; 8(4):217

Visit for more related articles at Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite significant advancements in understanding its molecular underpinnings, the complexity and heterogeneity of cancer present on-going challenges for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Proteomics, the large-scale study of proteins and their functions, has emerged as a powerful tool in cancer research, offering insights into the molecular mechanisms driving cancer and aiding in the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets [1], [2]

Proteomics enables the comprehensive analysis of the protein landscape within cancer cells, tissues, and bodily fluids. Unlike genomics, which focuses on the static information encoded in DNA, proteomics captures the dynamic nature of proteins, including their expression levels, post-translational modifications, interactions, and activities. This is particularly important in cancer, where aberrant protein expression and modifications play a critical role in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy [3].

MS is the cornerstone of proteomic research, allowing for the identification and quantification of thousands of proteins in a single experiment. Advances in MS technology have increased its sensitivity, resolution, and throughput, making it indispensable in cancer proteomics. This technique separates proteins based on their isoelectric point and molecular weight. Although less commonly used now due to limitations in sensitivity and reproducibility, 2-DE has historically been important in proteomic studies. These allow for the high-throughput analysis of protein interactions, modifications, and functions. They are particularly useful for identifying protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications in cancer cells. This combines liquid chromatography with MS to separate and analyze complex protein mixtures, providing detailed information on protein expression and modifications. Identifying proteins that are differentially expressed in cancer versus normal tissues can lead to the discovery of biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. For instance, proteomic studies have identified potential biomarkers in breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. Proteomic analysis helps elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer progression, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. This knowledge can inform the development of targeted therapies [4], [5]

Proteomics can identify potential drug targets and help in the screening of drug candidates. By analyzing the proteomic changes induced by drugs, researchers can gain insights into their mechanisms of action and potential side effects. Integrating proteomic data with genomic and clinical information can lead to more personalized approaches to cancer treatment. Proteomics can help predict patient responses to therapies and identify those who are likely to benefit from specific treatments. Despite its potential, proteomic analysis in cancer research faces several challenges. These include the complexity and dynamic range of the proteome, technical limitations in sensitivity and reproducibility, and the need for robust bioinformatics tools to analyze and interpret large datasets [6], [7]

Combining proteomic data with genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic data can provide a more comprehensive understanding of cancer biology. Advances in single-cell proteomics will allow for the analysis of protein expression at the single-cell level, providing insights into tumor heterogeneity and the behavior of individual cancer cells. Bridging the gap between proteomic research and clinical application is crucial. This involves the validation of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in large, well-characterized patient cohorts. Continued improvements in proteomic technologies, such as enhanced MS techniques and novel protein labeling strategies, will further advance the field [8], [9]

Proteomic analysis has revolutionized cancer research, providing unprecedented insights into the protein alterations driving cancer. As technologies and methodologies continue to advance, proteomics will play an increasingly vital role in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes [10].

References

  1. Ding Z, Wang N, Ji N, et al. Proteomics technologies for cancer liquid biopsies. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):53.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Nusinow DP, Szpyt J, Ghandi M, et al. Quantitative proteomics of the cancer cell line encyclopedia. Cell. 2020;180(2):387-402.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Letunica N, Van Den Helm S, McCafferty C, et al. Proteomics in thrombosis and hemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2022;122(07):1076-84.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Bhatia HS, Brunner AD, Öztürk F, et al. Spatial proteomics in three-dimensional intact specimens. Cell. 2022;185(26):5040-58.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Swietlik JJ, Bärthel S, Falcomatà C, et al. Cell-selective proteomics segregates pancreatic cancer subtypes by extracellular proteins in tumors and circulation. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2642.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Mukherjee A, Chiang CY, Daifotis HA, et al. Adipocyte-induced FABP4 expression in ovarian cancer cells promotes metastasis and mediates carboplatin resistance. Cancer Res. 2020;80(8):1748-61.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Gonçalves E, Poulos RC, Cai Z, et al. Pan-cancer proteomic map of 949 human cell lines. Cancer Cell. 2022;40(8):835-49.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Hoshino A, Kim HS, Bojmar L, et al. Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers define multiple human cancers. Cell. 2020;182(4):1044-61.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Zabransky DJ, Chhabra Y, Fane ME, et al. Fibroblasts in the aged pancreas drive pancreatic cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2024;84(8):1221-36.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Chabanon RM, Morel D, Eychenne T, et al. PBRM1 deficiency confers synthetic lethality to DNA repair inhibitors in cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(11):2888-902.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App