Journal of Psychology and Cognition

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Editorial - Journal of Psychology and Cognition (2024) Volume 9, Issue 4

Problematic Facebook Use: Understanding the Modern-Day Digital Challenge

Mohammad Jamshidi *

Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Iran.

*Corresponding Author:
Mohammad Jamshidi
Department of Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi University, Iran
E-mail: mgmd@jmsdi.ac.ir

Received: 25-Jun -2024, Manuscript No. AAJPC-24-148547; Editor assigned: 26- Jun -2024, PreQC No. . AAJPC-24-148547 (PQ); Reviewed:08- Jun -2024, QC No. AAJPC-24-148547; Revised:15- July -2024, Manuscript No. . AAJPC-24-148547 (R); Published:23- July -2024, DOI:10.35841/aajpc-9.4.246

Citation: Jamshidi M: Problematic facebook use: understanding the modern-day digital challenge.J Psychol Cognition. 2024;9(4):246

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Psychology and Cognition

Abstract

    

Introduction

Facebook, the social media giant launched in 2004, has transformed how we communicate, share information, and maintain social connections. With over 2.9 billion active users as of 2023, it has become deeply embedded in modern society. However, despite its benefits, Facebook also has a darker side — the phenomenon of Problematic Facebook Use (PFU), often linked to excessive or compulsive use that negatively impacts individuals’ mental health, productivity, and social well-being [1].

Problematic Facebook Use (PFU) refers to the compulsive or excessive engagement with Facebook that interferes with a person’s daily life, responsibilities, or mental health. It can manifest as an inability to control the amount of time spent on the platform or persistent preoccupation with Facebook-related activities, even when they negatively impact personal, academic, or professional life. PFU is similar in nature to other behavioral addictions, such as compulsive gambling or internet gaming disorder [ [2].

While it is important to note that PFU is not an officially recognized mental health disorder, numerous studies suggest that it shares characteristics with behavioral addictions. These characteristics include an inability to regulate use, a tendency to continue the behavior despite harmful consequences, and withdrawal symptoms when unable to engage in the activity [3].

A person spends more time on the platform than intended, often losing track of time while scrolling through posts, pictures, or videos.Users may find themselves constantly thinking about Facebook, even when they are not online. They may feel a strong urge to check notifications or updates, even during inappropriate situations like work or social gatherings.Users with PFU may start neglecting important tasks, whether related to work, school, or personal life. This neglect can result in diminished academic performance, missed deadlines, or a decline in job productivity [4].

Despite its promise to connect people, problematic Facebook use can lead to social isolation. Users may prioritize online interactions over in-person relationships, resulting in weakened real-life connections.A person with PFU may experience mood swings, anxiety, or irritability when they are unable to access Facebook. Feelings of restlessness or even panic may emerge when one is forced to be offline for extended periods [5].

Many users with PFU turn to Facebook as a means to escape stress, loneliness, or negative emotions. This reliance can create a cycle where users retreat into the platform as a coping mechanism rather than addressing the root causes of their emotional distress.Facebook's structure encourages users to present the best aspects of their lives, leading others to engage in constant social comparison. This habit can fuel feelings of inadequacy or envy, pushing people to check the platform more often to "keep up" with their peers [ [6].

Social media platforms, including Facebook, are designed to maximize user engagement. Likes, comments, and shares provide instant validation and gratification, which trigger dopamine releases in the brain, reinforcing the behavior. This can create a cycle of addiction, where users seek the next "hit" of social approval Facebook’s continuous updates on social events, personal milestones, and world news can induce FOMO — the anxiety that others are having rewarding experiences that one is not a part of. This leads to increased engagement with the platform to avoid feeling left out.Individuals who struggle with low self-esteem or feelings of loneliness may turn to Facebook for validation and connection. Unfortunately, this can exacerbate the problem, as the platform may offer a temporary solution without addressing deeper emotional issues [7].

Facebook’s algorithm promotes content that aligns with users’ interests and behaviors, often pushing personalized posts to the top of their feeds. This can result in an endless loop of highly engaging content, further contributing to excessive use.Studies have linked PFU to anxiety, depression, and increased stress levels. The constant pressure to maintain a perfect online persona or the emotional toll of social comparison can exacerbate mental health problems [8].

Time spent on Facebook at work or school can hinder productivity. Users may struggle to focus on their tasks or find themselves procrastinating in favor of engaging with the platform.Using Facebook late into the night or checking it first thing in the morning can disrupt sleep patterns. The blue light emitted by screens can interfere with the body's natural sleep-wake cycle, leading to poor quality sleep [ [9].

While Facebook is designed to foster connections, excessive use can have the opposite effect. Users may become more isolated, prioritizing online relationships over meaningful real-life interactions.Establish clear boundaries on the amount of time spent on Facebook daily. Using tools like app timers can help users stick to these limits.Reflect on the emotional triggers or situations that lead to excessive Facebook use. Once identified, work on finding healthier ways to cope with these feelings.Prioritize face-to-face interactions and invest in strengthening real-life relationships. Socializing in person can be more rewarding and fulfilling than online engagements. For individuals unable to control their use, seeking help from a therapist or counselor, especially one specializing in technology addiction, can provide valuable support [10].

conclusion

In conclusion, while Facebook can be a useful tool for connecting with others, problematic Facebook use poses significant risks to mental health, productivity, and social well-being. Recognizing the signs and taking proactive steps to manage online behavior can help individuals regain control and strike a healthier balance between their digital and offline lives.

References

  1. Serrano-Pozo A, Das S, Hyman BT. APOE and Alzheimer's disease: Advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurology. 2021;20(1):68-80.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(11):1106-25.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Naseri NN, Wang H, Guo J, et al. The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2019;705:183-94.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Graff-Radford J, Yong KX, Apostolova LG, et al. New insights into a typical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers. Lancet Neurology. 2021;20(3):222-34.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Hane FT, Robinson M, Lee BY, et al. Recent progress in Alzheimer’s disease research, part 3: Diagnosis and treatment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(3):645-65.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Ballard R, Perez-Reisler M. Developmental aspects of pediatric mental health. Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(10):e426-30.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Bauger L, Bongaardt R. Structural developmental psychology and health promotion in the third age. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(4):686-94.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Chastain EJ.Information Theory, Developmental Psychology, and the Baldwin Effect. Front Neurorobot. 2018;12:52.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Frankenhuis WE, Tiokhin L. Bridging evolutionary biology and developmental psychology: Toward an enduring theoretical infrastructure. Child Dev. 2018;89(6):2303-6.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Kline MA, Shamsudheen R, Broesch T. Variation is the universal: Making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1743):20170059.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App