Case Report - Current Pediatric Research (2017) Volume 21, Issue 2

Prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in school going children aged between 5-12 years in Bengaluru.

¹Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, KIMS Hospital Bangalore, India.

²Postgraduate, Department of Pediatrics, KIMS Hospital Bangalore, India.

³Professor, Department of Psychiatry, KIMS Hospital Bangalore, India.

*Corresponding Author:

Goutham AS
Junior Resident, Department of Pediatrics
Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences
#208, KIMS Residents Quaters, KIMS Hospital
VV Puram, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560004, India.
Tel: +919590946059
E-mail: gouthamas@gmail.com

Accepted date: April 20, 2017

Abstract

Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood psychiatric disorders that affect 2% to 14% of school age children. It is characterized by age inappropriate level of inattention with or without motor over activity and impulsivity in academic and social spheres. Boys are more affected than girls and male female ratio is 4:1. Although ADHD is the most common condition, the evidence from Indian studies is very less. Many studies are required in India to see the magnitude of ADHD. Evaluation of the prevalence of this condition in our country will help clinicians to consider the diagnosis of ADHD and related disorders. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ADHD among school going children (5 years to 12years) and to know the difference between government and private schools as well as to determine male to female ratio in Bengaluru. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in Bengaluru city by convenience sampling method. A total 18 schools comprising of both private and government were selected. 3120 Children aged between 5-12years studying in these schools were included in the study. Introduction about ADHD was given by Paediatrician to the teachers followed by screening for ADHD was done by teachers using Conner’s teachers rating scale for all children. Positive cases in these were screened with Parents and Paediatrician by using Conner’s parent rating scale. Children who were positive in Parents and Paediatrician rating scale were interviewed by the Psychiatrist at KIMS Hospital and ADHD was diagnosed by using DSM V criteria along with IQ assessment and treatment was started for the needy. Results: The prevalence of ADHD in our study was 1.3%. Male to female ratio was 1.6:1. Among the positive cases, children belonging to Hyperactivity type were 34.1%, inattention was 9.8% and combined type was 56.1%. Prevalence in private school was 1.25% and government school was 1.37%. Total dropouts were 2.5% who did not reach the hospital for the final diagnosis. Conclusion: ADHD is prevalent worldwide and it is also one of the emerging disorders in our country. It constitutes a significant mental health disorder in children and 50% of this disorder will be carried to adulthood. In our study we had prevalence of 1.3% ADHD and 2.5% dropouts due to lack of awareness of this disorder, their work pressure, distance, social and financial constricts. It is high time to identify the disorder and creating wide spread awareness about ADHD by the Paediatrician’s among the Teachers, Parents and Primary care Physicians, in order to prevent the social and academic impact of the disorder. By introducing an ADHD standard screening methods in all schools along with the regular health check-ups will bring awareness in the society for the healthy future of the children. Lastly every school should have a counsellor to overcome ADHD and other related problems.

Keywords

Hyperactivity, Children, Schools.

Introduction

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has been described all around the world and is the most common neurobehavioral disorder of childhood and one among the most common chronic health conditions affecting school-age children [1,2]. It is characterized by inattention, increased distractibility with difficulty sustaining attention, poor impulse control and decreased self-inhibitory capacity, motor over activity and motor restlessness [3].

The first example of a disorder that appears to be similar to ADHD was given by Sir Alexander Crichton in 1798. George still, conducted study on a group of 20 children whom he described as having a deficit in “volitional inhibition [4]. He reported that there was an overrepresentation of male subjects, a family history of alcoholism, criminal conduct, and depression, a family predisposition and the possibility that the condition may arise from an injury to the nervous system. Still’s observations are quite common and have been corroborated in later research.

Later, it was stated that mild forms of brain damage in infancy, although unnoticed at that time, could lead to behavioural sequelae, which becomes first apparent at school [5,6].

In 2008, it was defined as a “persistent pattern of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, that is more frequent and severe than is typically observed at a comparable level of development” affecting approximately 5% of school-age children and frequently persisting into adulthood [7-9].

Population surveys suggest that ADHD occurs around the world in about 5% of children and it is carried to about 2.5% of adults. These reported rates vary depending upon the nature of the population sampled and the method of ascertainment [3]. Many studies across the globe have reported the prevalence of ADHD in 5% to 10% of school aged children. Most of them are western studies and there is a little information about the same from India.

ADHD is often undiagnosed in children. This is usually due to lack of awareness of ADHD among parents and teachers. Children with ADHD have difficulty in performing scholastically to their optimum levels. This translates to stress on the family and in turn has an emotional impact on the child. Hence, there is an urgent need for continued teamwork on prevalence of ADHD in our country.

This study provides the much needed epidemiologic data on ADHD as well as understands the influence of socioeconomic factors in the same which in turn would help in designing the programme to increase the awareness of ADHD in parents as well as teachers.

This study also helps in differentiating the prevalence of ADHD between Private and Government schools by including the socio-economical and educational factors causing impact on children’s mental health. Finally, this study will throw light on the male female ratio in the prevalence of ADHD.

Aims and Objectives

1. To study the Prevalence of ADHD in children aged 5-12 years in urban schools of Bengaluru.

2. To compare the Prevalence of ADHD in Government and Private Schools.

3. To create awareness among the teachers and parents about ADHD in children.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

The study was conducted in Bengaluru South block schools.

Study Design

Cross sectional-descriptive.

Study Duration

Time period of two year, i.e., October 2014 to October 2016.

Study Population

School children in the age group 5 to 12 years in Bengaluru city.

Exclusion Criteria

• Children <5 years and >12 years.

• Children with conduct disorders and oppositional disorders.

• Children studying in schools outside Bengaluru city limits.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics-percentages and proportion.

Ethical Clearance

The study protocol was submitted to the ethical committee of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and clearance obtained before the study was commenced.

Method of Collection of Data (Including Sampling Procedure)

Sampling procedure: Convenience sampling

Sample size: N=3120, Sample size has been calculated taking prevalence of ADHD among school going children as 5% at 5% significance level and 10% allowable error.

Collection of Data

The collection of data was done in 4 phases. These rating scales assist in determining whether children between the ages 5 to 12 years might suffer from ADHD. Details are presented in presented in supplementary file.

Study Instruments

Semi-structured Performa was prepared after discussion with the psychiatrist. It is a questionnaire with 12 simple questions from DSM-V criteria related to the ADHD symptoms. It has 6 questions related to inattention, 6 questions related to hyperactivity and impulsivity. It was translated to kannada for easy understanding and use in kannada medium schools.

Conner’s Rating Scale, Revised (CRS-R): Developed by C. Keith Conners, Ph.D., CRS-R is used as part of a comprehensive examination and is designed to be easily administered and scored. CRS-R is the widely used rating scale and has set the standard for assessing ADHD and related problems. CRS-R is available in long and short versions for both parents and teachers. Short version (each comprising of 27 items) of both parent and teachers rating scale was used in our study.

Based on the types of symptoms, three kinds (presentations) of ADHD can occur:

1. Combined Presentation: if enough symptoms of both criteria inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity were present for the past 6 months

2. Predominantly Inattentive Presentation: if enough symptoms of inattention, but not hyperactivity-impulsivity, were present for the past six months

3. Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive Presentation: if enough symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity but not inattention were present for the past six months.

Results and Observations

We found 41 children with ADHD, which translates to a prevalence rate of 1.3 % in school going children of age group 5 to 12 years. The prevalence was 1.6% in boys and 1% in girls.

The above Table 1 also shows the sex distribution of the children screened which was 56.7% boys and 43.3% girls (1.30:1) whereas the boys: girl ratio among ADHD children is 1.6:1 and is significant (p value<0.001).

Table 2 shows the prevalence of ADHD in different age groups. The prevalence is highest in 6-8 years group and lowest in 5 years age group. The prevalence tends to decrease as age progresses.

Figure 1 shows the prevalence of ADHD subtypes in our study sample. In this study, the prevalence of hyperactivity subtype was 34.1%, the inattention type was 9.8% and combined type was 56.1%. Combined type was more predominant in our study closely followed by hyperactivity type.

Table 3 shows distribution of ADHD children based on different subtypes of disorder. In children of 5 years prevalence of ADHD is 7.14%. The hyperactivity type is 2.38%, combined type is 4.76% and inattention type is 0%. In children of 6-8 years prevalence of ADHD is 1.06%. The hyperactivity type is 0.47%, combined type is 0.35% and inattention type is 0.23%. In children of 9-10 years prevalence of ADHD is 0.96%. The hyperactivity type is 0.35%, combined type is 0.52% and inattention type is 0.09%.

In children of 11-12 years prevalence of ADHD is 1.65%. The hyperactivity type is 0.46%, combined type is 1.10% and inattention type is 0.09%.

This Table 4 shows that in our study 53.66% of the children with ADHD belonged to Government school, 46.34% to private. The difference was not significant in statistical analysis.

This Table 5 shows the academic performance of children who were diagnosed to have ADHD. This academic performance was based on the marks obtained in the tests and exams in school. Out of 41 children only 31 children were having average grades and 10 children having poor grade, none of them were having good grades.

Table 1. Prevalence rate of ADHD by gender

Table 2. Prevalence rate based on age

Table 3. Distribution of ADHD children based on different subtypes of disorder

Table 4. ADHD children and type of school

Table 5. Academic performances of ADHD children.

Figure 1. Prevalence of ADHD subtypes

Discussion

Our study shows 1.3% prevalence of ADHD. Other studies which have prevalence of 2-15% Dropouts were 2.56%. Among these, most of them were having significant scores in Teachers, Parents and Pediatrician’s scale and were unavailable for follow up at the KIMS hospital. The probable reasons behind this is lack of knowledge and false beliefs about ADHD in our country and in a metropolitan city like Bengaluru, many could not approach us to the hospital during working hours for final follow up with all their work pressure, distance, social and financial constricts.

This study examined the prevalence of ADHD in 3120 school age children of age group 5 to 12 years by cross sectional survey in Bengaluru city in Karnataka. Although the prevalence of 1.3% is low when compared with the studies in western countries and some studies in India, it is consistent with some Indian studies in school age children [3,10,11].

A review of 17 studies conducted in all continents showed a wide range of prevalence ranging from 0.2% to 23%. These studies were done using different criteria (DSM and ICD) and strategy adopted to collect information were different (i.e., only parents or teacher or both, whether functional impairment required, whether child was interviewed). Studies based on information from either only parents or teachers have higher prevalence than the studies which collect information from both parents and teachers, which in turn will be higher compared to studies which includes interview in addition to the information from both parents and teacher.

According to Kurtzke et al., epidemiological studies with a higher prevalence should be considered as estimated or screening prevalence because many false positives may be included. That may explain part of the differences observed between the results obtained from different studies [12].

More recent community based epidemiological studies have reported much lower prevalence figures. The Great Britain office of national statistics conducted a survey of more than 10,000 children and found a DSM-IV based prevalence of 1.4% in 1999 and 1.5% in 2004. A similar profile is seen in recent studies conducted in developing countries. In Brazil DSM-IV based prevalence of 1.8%, 2% in Bangladesh and 1.6% in India were noted. In our study, the prevalence is 1.3% and is consistent with these recent studies. [13].

Epidemiological surveys in western countries have reported a greater incidence in boys than in girls; the ratio ranging from 2:1 to 10:1 [14,15]. Whereas Indian studies have reported ADHD to be 3.3 to 7.7 times more common in boys than girls.

Our study gives the sex ratio of 1.6:1 which is (low) compared to above studies, but a recent meta-analysis of studies done in last decade gives a pooled prevalence of (2.4:1) which is consistent with the present study [16].

According to Goodman et al. [16] the gender differences strengthens the evidence for a biologically based, often genetically transmitted etiology of hyperkinetic disorder.

This difference may be due to the fact that girls have ADHD with higher predominance of inattention type, causing less trouble to the family and at school, and are therefore less easily identified.

Our study shows higher prevalence in the age groups 11- 12 years. This is consistent with the findings of Mullick et al. [17] which also showed a higher prevalence of ADHD in age groups 9-10 years and 11 to 12 years. This difference may be due to increased demands of attention both in school as well as home as the child grows.

In our study, ADHD was associated with poor academic performance in 24.4%, average performance in 75.6% and none in good performance (based on marks obtained in tests and examinations). This is in accordance with the fact that there is functional impairment in children with ADHD.

Our study shows higher prevalence of ADHD among children whose mothers were homemakers and is not consistent with the hypothesis that homemakers are in a better position to look after their children at home both socially and psychologically [18].

High proportions of mothers in this study were either had primary education or illiterate, which puts more weight on education as a contribution factor. ADHD is one of the best investigated child mental health disorders. ADHD has received a great deal of clinical, scientific and public attention in recent years. In the last decade, western literature on this syndrome has grown but in India only a few studies have been done. Hence this study was done to fill this void.

There is lack of awareness about ADHD in parents, teachers and even among treating clinicians to create necessary awareness about ADHD, study results were discussed in parent – teacher meet conducted monthly in the school. Early detection and intervention about ADHD were explained. Teachers were also trained on classroom management of ADHD children.

Conclusion

Our study aim was to find the prevalence of ADHD among 5-12years old school going children in Bengaluru. We found a prevalence of 1.3% with male: female ratio of 1.6:1. Although the prevalence in our study is low compared to studies in western countries and also some Indian studies, it still constitutes a major public health problem. Epidemiological survey of ADHD is important in planning health services. Therefore further interview based studies assessing the prevalence of ADHD as defined by DSM-V criteria are required in different parts of the country to get a clearer picture of its burden in our country. The knowledge of ADHD is lacking in teachers, parents and also in the society, by this study we would like to recommend the ADHD screening should be done regularly along with routine health check-ups done annually in every government and private school, counsellors should be there in every government and private school to help students to overcome these type of issues.

References

1. Somanath B, Niranjan S, Hemanth. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in childhood. Pediatrics Today 2008; 10: 5.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Association 2013: 61.
3. Kliegman, Behrman, Schor, et al. Nelson Text Book of Pediatrics: 18th ed. Saunders Elsevier Publishers 2007; 1: 200-204.
4. Still GF. Some abnormal physical conditions in children. Lancet 1902; 1: 1008-1168.
5. Kessler JW. History of minimal brain dysfunctions. In: Rie HE, Rie ED, editors. Handbook of minimal brain dysfunctions: A critical view. New York: Wiley 1980; 18-51.
6. Ross DM, Ross SA. Hyperactivity: Research, theory and action. New York: Wiley 1976: 15.
7. Biederman J. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A life-span perspective. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59: 4-16.
8. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Mick E. The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 159-165.
9. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer T, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: An overview. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48: 9-20.
10. Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 942-948.
11. Polanczyk GV, Willcutt EG, Salum GA, et al. ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2014; 43: 434-442.
12. Kurtzke JF. Neuroepidemiology. In: Joint RJ, ed. Clinical Neurology. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1992; 4: 1-29.
13. Srinath S, Girimaji SC, Gururaj G, et al. Epidemiological study of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders in urban and rural areas of Bangalore. India. Indian J Med Res 2005; 122: 67?79.
14. Kramer F, Pollnow H. Über eine hyperkinetische Erkrankung im Kindesalter. Aus der Psychiatrischen und Nerven-Klinik der Charité in Berlin (Direktor: Geh. Med.-Rat Prof. Dr. Bonhoeffer) Mschr Psychiat Neurol 1932; 82: 21-40.
15. Fayyad J, de Graaf R, Kessler R, et al. Cross-national prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 402-409.
16. Goodman R, Slobodskaya H, Knyazev G. Russian child mental health and cross-sectional study of prevalence and risk factors. Eur Child Adolescent Psychiatry 2005; 14: 28-33.
17. Mullick MS, Goodman R. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among 5-10 year olds in rural, urban and slum areas in Bangladesh: an exploratory study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005; 40: 663-671
18. Schmitt J, Romanos M, Schmitt NM, et al. Atopic eczema and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a population-based sample of children and adolescents. JAMA. 2009; 301: 724-726.