Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Editorial - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

Pediatric Spinal Surgery: Advances and Considerations

Farshidfar Sullivan*

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Langone Health care, Indonesia

*Corresponding Author:
Farshidfar Sullivan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Langone Health care
Indonesia
E-mail:farshidfar@sullivan.com

Received:24-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-119658;Editor assigned:28-Jun-2024, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-119658 (PQ); Reviewed:10-Jul-2024, QC No. AAOSR-23-119658; Revised:15-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-119658(R); Published:22-Jul-2024, DOI: 10.35841/ aaosr-8.4.215

Citation: Sullivan F. Paediatric Spinal Surgery: Advances and Considerations.J Ortho Sur Reh.2024; 8(4):215

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Introduction

A common treatment for a number of shoulder diseases, such as glen humeral arthritis, rotator cuff tears, and osteoarthritis, is Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA). Despite advancements in surgical procedures, postoperative rehabilitation remains a crucial factor in determining the long-term success and functional consequences of the treatment. The best postoperative rehabilitation regimen for TSA is not widely agreed upon in the literature. The purpose of this research is to compare various rehabilitation strategies and assess how they affect TSA patients' functional outcomes. Patients who had TSA for a variety of reasons participated in a multicentre prospective comparison research. Three rehabilitation protocols were applied to the patients: Protocol A prioritised early active range of motion exercises; Protocol B used a progressive approach to rehabilitation; and Protocol C concentrated on passive range of motion activities.[1].

At particular postoperative intervals, functional outcomes such as shoulder mobility, strength, and pain alleviation were evaluated together with patient-reported outcome measures. The trial comprised 250 TSA patients in total, with about equal numbers in each procedure group. There were notable differences in the functional outcomes across the three treatments. Although Protocol A showed a greater rate of early postoperative discomfort, shoulder strength and mobility recovered more quickly. A balanced recovery trajectory with reduced pain levels and acceptable shoulder function was the outcome of Protocol B. Protocol C's functional recovery was slower, mostly as a result of its passive methodology. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were best in Protocol B. The impact of rehabilitation methods on functional results after total shoulder arthroplasty is highlighted in this comparative study. Protocol B seems to offer a well-rounded approach with better pain control, adequate shoulder mobility, and patient satisfaction. It places an emphasis on gradual progressive rehabilitation. [2].

Based on the unique qualities of each patient, the surgeon's preferences, and the surgical indications, a customised rehabilitation regimen should be created. These results could help create customised rehabilitation protocols for TSA patients, which would eventually improve their quality of life and optimise their postoperative results. The surgical procedure known as Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA), or shoulder joint replacement, has shown promise in treating a number of crippling shoulder disorders, such as glen humeral arthritis, rotator cuff tears, and end-stage osteoarthritis. For individuals with certain diseases, this procedure has been shown to improve their quality of life, decrease discomfort, and restore function. Nonetheless, the postoperative rehabilitation regimen is just as important to the success of TSA as the surgical approach and implant choice.. [3].

The effectiveness of TSA in the long run and its functional results are heavily dependent on rehabilitation; yet, there is ongoing discussion and disagreement on the best rehabilitation strategy. Ensuring the integrity and lifetime of the prosthetic joint while facilitating the restoration of shoulder function is the main objective of postoperative therapy in TSA. A thorough awareness of the several rehabilitation procedures that are available is necessary to tackle the complex task of striking this careful balance between early mobilisation, muscle strengthening, and pain control. While some protocols (Protocol A) place emphasis on early active range of motion exercises, others (Protocol B) support progressive recovery gradually, while still others (Protocol C) emphasise passive range of motion activities. While each of these methods has advantages, the best course of action is still up for debate. With the growing number of TSA operations performed and the differing viewpoints on postoperative rehabilitation, this research aims to fill up these information gaps. It seeks to offer evidence-based perspectives on how various rehabilitation regimens affect TSA patients' functional results. We hope to improve the overall quality of care for TSA patients by comparing the various rehabilitation approaches and determining which one best combines early recovery, pain control, and patient satisfaction. It is anticipated that the study's conclusions would offer insightful guidance to patients and clinicians alike, helping them choose the best rehabilitation plan after TSA. These discoveries may result in the creation of customised rehabilitation protocols, improve TSA patients' postoperative outcomes, and eventually raise their standard of living.[4].

The impact of rehabilitation methods on functional results after total shoulder arthroplasty is highlighted in this comparative study. Protocol B seems to offer a well-rounded approach with better pain control, adequate shoulder mobility, and patient satisfaction. It places an emphasis on gradual progressive rehabilitation. Based on the unique qualities of each patient, the surgeon's preferences, and the surgical indications, a customised rehabilitation regimen should be created. These results could help create customised rehabilitation protocols for TSA patients, which would eventually improve their quality of life and optimise their postoperative results. The trial comprised 250 TSA patients in total, with about equal numbers in each procedure group. There were notable differences in the functional outcomes across the three treatments. Although Protocol A showed a greater rate of early postoperative discomfort, shoulder strength and mobility recovered more quickly. A balanced recovery trajectory with reduced pain levels and acceptable shoulder function was the outcome of Protocol B. Protocol C's functional recovery was slower, mostly as a result of its passive methodology. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were best in Protocol B.[5].

References

References

  1. Wirth MD, Hébert JR, Shivappa N, et al. Anti-inflammatory Dietary Inflammatory Index scores are associated with healthier scores on other dietary indices.Nutr Res. 2016 ;36(3):214-9.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Hébert JR, Shivappa N, Wirth MD et al.Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII)—lessons learned, improvements made, and future directions.Adv Nutr. 2019 ;10(2):185-95.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Elma Ö, Yilmaz ST, Deliens T, et al. Nutritional factors in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Unravelling the underlying mechanisms Br J Anaesth. 2020 ;125(2):e231-3.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Gandjian M, Sareh S, Premji A, et al.Racial disparities in surgical management and outcomes of acute limb ischemia in the United StatesSurg Open Sci. 2021;6:45-50.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Strath LJ, Sims AM, Overstreet DS et al. Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is Associated with Movement-Evoked Pain Severity in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: Sociodemographic Differences.J Pain Res. 2022;23(8):1437-47.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Strath LJ, Sims AM, Overstreet DS et al. Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is Associated with Movement-Evoked Pain Severity in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: Sociodemographic DifferencesJ Pain Res. 2022;23(8):1437-47.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Scully RE, Arnaoutakis DJ, Smith AD et al. Estimated annual health care expenditures in individuals with peripheral arterial disease.J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(2):558-67.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Nilsson A, Willis M, Neslusan C.A review of the costs of lower limb amputations in patients with diabetes in the US.Value Health. 2018 ;21:S73.
    9. Google Scholar

     

  9. Tatulashvili S, Fagherazzi G, Dow C et al.Socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes complications: A systematic review.Diabetes Metab. 2020; 46(2):89-99.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar,

    ,Cross Ref

  10. Khorsha F, Mirzababaei A, Togha M et al Association of drinking water and migraine headache severity. J Clin Neurosci.2020;77:81-4.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App