Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Rapid Communication - Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics (2023) Volume 8, Issue 6

Patient-Centric Perspectives: The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Quality of Life

Nanan Nuren *

Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida International University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Nanan Nuren
Department of Oral Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia
E-mail: nanan @mail.unpad.ac.id

Received: 26-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. JMOT-23-121020; Editor assigned: 27- Oct -2023, PreQC No JMOT-23-121020 (PQ); Reviewed:09- Nov -2023, QC No. JMOT-23-121020; Revised:14- Nov -2023, Manuscript No. JMOT-23-121020 (R); Published:22- Nov -2023, DOI:10.35841/jmot-8.6.177

Citation:

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics

Introduction

Radiation therapy is a vital and effective treatment method used in the fight against cancer. Despite its proven track record, there are numerous myths and misconceptions surrounding this form of treatment. These myths can lead to fear, confusion, and unnecessary anxiety for patients and their families. In this article, we will debunk some common radiation therapy myths and separate fact from fiction to provide a clearer understanding of this important medical procedure [1].

One of the most prevalent myths about radiation therapy is that it is an excruciatingly painful process. In reality, radiation therapy itself is painless. Patients undergoing radiation therapy do not feel any discomfort during the procedure. The machine used to deliver radiation does not touch the body, and the treatment itself typically lasts only a few minutes. Some patients might experience mild skin irritation or fatigue, but these side effects are manageable and temporary [2].

Concerns about radiation therapy causing harm to healthy cells and leading to other diseases are common. However, radiation therapy is highly targeted. Modern technology allows oncologists to precisely aim radiation beams at the cancerous cells while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. The treatment is carefully planned and tailored to each patient's specific condition, ensuring the highest level of safety and effectiveness [3].

While radiation therapy can impact reproductive organs, the belief that it inevitably leads to permanent infertility is a misconception. For patients of childbearing age, discussions about fertility preservation options should occur before starting radiation therapy. Advances in medical technology, such as sperm or egg banking, allow patients to preserve their fertility before undergoing treatment, providing them with the opportunity to have children in the future [4].

Some people mistakenly think that radiation therapy is only used when cancer has reached an advanced stage and all other treatment options have failed. In reality, radiation therapy can be used at various stages of cancer treatment. It can be the primary treatment method, used alongside surgery or chemotherapy, or employed after surgery to eliminate any remaining cancer cells [5].

The decision to include radiation therapy in a patient's treatment plan depends on the type of cancer, its stage, and the individual's overall health. Unlike some chemotherapy treatments, radiation therapy does not lead to widespread hair loss. Hair loss is localized to the area being treated [6].

For example, a patient receiving radiation therapy for brain cancer will not experience hair loss on their scalp, while a patient receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer may lose some hair on their chest area. Hair loss is often a temporary side effect, and hair typically grows back once the treatment is completed [7].

While radiation therapy is a powerful tool in the fight against cancer, it is not a universal cure for all types of the disease. The effectiveness of radiation therapy varies depending on the type, location, and stage of cancer. In some cases, radiation therapy can shrink tumors, alleviate symptoms, or eliminate cancer cells, but it may not always result in a complete cure. Treatment plans are developed based on a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's condition, and radiation therapy is used when it is deemed appropriate and beneficial [8].

Here are different types of radiation therapy, including external beam radiation therapy and internal radiation therapy (brachytherapy). External beam radiation therapy is delivered from outside the body using machines, while brachytherapy involves placing radioactive sources directly into or near the tumor. Both methods are highly targeted and designed to maximize the effectiveness of the treatment while minimizing damage to healthy tissues [9].

Radiation therapy is used to treat a wide range of cancers, including but not limited to breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, and brain tumors. The approach and techniques may vary based on the specific type of cancer and its location within the body. Research and advancements in radiation therapy continue to expand its applications across different cancer types [10].

conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the facts about radiation therapy is essential for patients and their families facing a cancer diagnosis. By dispelling these common myths, individuals can make informed decisions about their treatment options, leading to a better overall experience during their cancer journey. It is crucial to consult with healthcare professionals and oncologists who can provide accurate information and guide patients through the process, ensuring they receive the most effective and appropriate care tailored to their specific needs.

References

  1. Thakor AS, Gambhir SS. Nanooncology: the future of cancer diagnosis and therapy. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2013;63(6):395-418.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross

  3. Campos FG. Colorectal cancer in young adults: A difficult challenge. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(28):5041.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Siegel RL, Torre LA, Soerjomataram I,et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence in young adults. Gut. 201;68(12):2179-85.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Singh KE, Taylor TH, Pan CJ,et al. Colorectal cancer incidence among young adults in California. JAYAO. 2014;3(4):176-84.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Weinberg BA, Marshall JL, Salem ME. The growing challenge of young adults with colorectal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2017;31(5):381-9.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  11. Y?lmazlar T, Zorluo?lu A, Özgüç H,et al. Colorectal cancer in young adults. Tumori Journal. 1995;81(4):230-3.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Sudarshan V, Hussain N, Gahine R, et al. Colorectal cancer in young adults in a tertiary care hospital in Chhattisgarh, Raipu Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(4):337-40.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH,et al. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg. 2003;69(10):866-72.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Siegel RL, Jemal A, Ward EM. Increase in incidence of colorectal cancer among young men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun 1;18(6):1695-8.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Bedikian AY, Kantarjian HA, Nelson RS,et al. Colorectal cancer in young adults. South Med J.. 1981;74(8):920-4.
  20. Google Scholar

Get the App